Bosnia and Herzegovina between International Interventions and Dissolution
Abstract
The state building process of Bosnia and Herzegovina beyond the provisions of the Dayton Peace Agreement has been implemented by the West for twenty-eight years through different forms. The goals which they failed to achieve in Dayton, they have tried to achieve by force, punishments, over-voting by foreign judges, impositions by high representatives, and by transferring the competences from the entities to a state level and suspending democracy. Their goal was to dismantle the Dayton Agreement and strengthen the state level government at the cost of the entity’s autonomy, but instead of unitarization, they turned B&H into a weak protectorate. Today, Bosnia and Herzegovina has a huge discrepancy between the Dayton constitutional system and the situation on the ground caused by decades of various foreign interventions in its political and legal system. The lack of potential solutions for getting out of the objectively dysfunctional state further strengthened the impression that B&H is moving in the direction of dissolution. The main focus of this paper is the claim that the interventions undertaken by one part of the international community in B&H have increased the potential of the dissolution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
References
Antić, Č., Kecmanović, N. (2016). History of the Republic Srpska. Beograd: Nedeljnik, Banjaluka: Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske. [In Serbian]
Ashdown, P. (2007). Swords and Ploughshares: Bringing Peace to the 21st Century. London: Orion.
Ashdown, P. (2010). A Fortunate Life: The Autobiography of Paddy Ashdown. London: Aurum Press.
Banning, T. (2014). The ’Bonn Powers’ of the High Representative in Bosnia Herzegovina: Tracing a Legal Figment. Goettingen Journal of International Law, VI (2), 259–302. Available at: https://www.gojil.eu/issues/62/62_article_banning.pdf.
Barnett, M. (2006). Building a Republican peace: Stabilizing states after War. International Security, XXX (4), 87–112. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137530.
Baros, M. (2010, December 14). The High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina: A Requiem for Legality. EJIL: Talk! – Blog of the European Journal of International Law. Retrieved from: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-high-representative-forbosnia-and-herzegovina-a-requiem-for-legality. Accessed: 29. 11. 2023.
Belloni, R. (2008). State Building and International Intervention in Bosnia. London: Routledge.
Bennett, C. (2016). Bosnia’s Paralysed Peace. London: Hurst & Co.
Blagojević, M. (2018). Chrestomathy of Achaerism Technology – A Chronicle of a National and Constitutional Pathology. Banjaluka: Službeni glasnik Republike Srpske. [In Serbian]
Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, R. (2005). International Governance of War-torn Territories: Rule and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chandler, D. (2000). Bosnia: Faking Democracy After Dayton. London: Pluto Press.
Chandler, D. (2005). From Dayton to Europe. International Peacekeeping, XII (3), 336–349. DOI:10.1080/13533310500074077
Clausewitz, C. v. (2007). On War. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crawford, C. (2011). Bosnia: the Bonn Powers Crawl Away to Die. Retrieved from: http://charlescrawford.biz/2011/07/05/bosnia-the-bonn-powers-crawl-away-to-die. Accessed: 29. 11. 2023.
Downes, A. B. (2007). The Problem with Negotiated Settlements to Ethnic Civil Wars. In: M. Bloom and R. Licklider (eds). Living Together After Ethnic Cleansing: Exploring the Chaim Kaufmann Argument. New York: Routledge.
Ghali, B. B. (1992). An Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.
Ghali, B. B. (1995). Supplement to an Agenda for Peace. New York: United Nations.
Hayden, R. M. (1999). Blueprints for a House Divided: The Constitutional Logic of the Yugoslav Conflicts. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ignatieff, M. (2003). Empire Lite: Nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. London: Penguin.
Kasapović, M. М. (2005). Bosnia and Herzegovina, divided society and unstable state. Zagreb: Politička kultura. [In Croatian]
Kaufmann, C. (1996). Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars. International Security, XX (4), 136-175. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.20.4.136
Kaufmann, C. D. (1999). When All Else Fails: Evaluating Population Transfers and Partition as Solutions to Ethnic Conflict. In: B. F. Walter and J. Snyder (eds). Civil Wars, Insecurity and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kellas, J. G. (2004). Nationalist Politics in Europe – The Constitutional and Electoral Dimensions. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kecmanović, N., Vranješ, A., Budimir, Ž. (2021). Rise of An Idea – Freedom and Autonomy of the Republic Srpska and the Role of Milorad Dodik. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Knaus, G., Martin, F. (2003). Travails of the European Raj. Journal of Democracy. XIV (3), 60–74. Available at: https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/KnausandMartin.pdf
Leroux-Martin, P. (2014). Diplomatic Counterinsurgency: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina. New York: Cambridge University press.
Merdzanovic, A. (2015). Democracy by Decree – Prospects and Limits of Imposed Consociational Democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Stuttgart: Ibidem Press
O’Hanlon, M. (1998). Turning the Bosnia Ceasefire into Peace. The Brookings Review, XVI (1), 41–44. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20080768
Orr, R. C. (2004). The United States as Nation Builder. In: R. Orr (ed.) Winning the Peace: An American Strategy for Postconflict Reconstruction (3–18). Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press
Parish, M. (2009). A Free City in the Balkans: Reconstructing a Divided Society in Bosnia. London: I. B. Tauris.
Parish, M. (2017). A free city in the Balkans: reconstructing a divided society in Bosnia. Brčko: Brčanski demokratski forum. [In Bosnian]
Pasch, P. (2012). Bosnia and Hercegovina 2025: Scenarios on Future Developments. Sarajevo: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. [In Bosnian]
PIC Bonn Conclusions. (1998). Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998: Self-sustaining Structures. Retrieved from: http://www.ohr.int/pic-bonn-conclusions/?print=pdf. Accessed: 30.11.2023.
Sebastián-Aparicio, S. (2014). Post-War Statebuilding and Constitutional Reform – Beyond Dayton in Bosnia. London:Palgrave Macmillan.
Stokes, G. (2003). Solving the Wars of Yugoslav Secession. In: N. M. Mainark and H. Case (eds). Yugoslavia and Its Historians: Understanding the Balkan Wars of the 1990s. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Waters, T. W. (2004). Contemplating Failure and Creating Alternatives in the Balkans: Bosnia’s Peoples, Democracy, and the Shape of Self-Determination. Yale International Law Journal, Vol. XXIX, 423–475. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1324&context=facpub.
Westendorp, C. (1997). Interview: Carlos Westendorp, High Representative in BiH. Slobodna Bosna, 30 November 1997. Downloaded from: http://www.ohr.int/?p=57486. Accessed on 30 November 2023.
Woodward, S. L. (1999). How Not to End a Civil War. In: Snyder, J. and Walter, B. (eds). Civil War, Insecurity, and Intervention. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zaum, D. (2007). The Sovereignty Paradox: The Norms and Politics of International Statebuilding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
