RECENT SERBIAN LITERATURE AS A REFLECTION AND AGENT OF THE POLITICAL ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
This manuscript inquires into the intricate relationship between Serbian literature and the political environment from 1991 to 2021, highlighting how literature not only reflects societal conditions but actively shapes political and cultural discourse. It examines the dual role of literature as both a product of its time and a powerful tool for influencing collective memory and social values. The analysis begins by referencing Plato's critique of poetry in The Republic, where he perceives literature as a mere imitation of reality, inferior to the world of ideas. However, the manuscript counters this view by emphasizing the significant impact literary works have had throughout history in shaping political ideas, social movements, and the destinies of nations. The manuscript underscores how literature and politics are mutually constitutive, with literature serving as a reflection of the political context in which authors live and create. It argues that through their works, writers provide insights into historical epochs, helping readers understand social changes and processes. Literature does not only mirror the political environment but can also be an active participant in shaping it, functioning as a cultural force that socializes generations of citizens. Several examples from Serbian and world literature illustrate how literary works have influenced political realities. For instance, Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin played a crucial role in shaping public opinion against slavery in the United States, while Orwell's 1984 and Huxley's Brave New World have had a profound impact on political thought, warning against the dangers of totalitarianism. In the Serbian context, the works of authors like Dobrica Ćosić and Borislav Pekić are highlighted for their significant influence on the national consciousness and political thought. The manuscript discusses the role of literature in times of political crises and upheavals, noting how Serbian writers have often been politically active, with many participating in political movements and organizations. It also touches upon the ideological conflicts within Serbian literature, where different groups of writers are divided by their views on national identity, traditional values, and the role of history in contemporary society.
Moreover, the manuscript explores how literature serves as a space for exploring broader themes, using political context as a backdrop. Writers often use fiction to delve into deeper questions, employing symbolism, metaphors, and layered narratives to express political ideas while leaving room for diverse interpretations. This allows literature to remain a potent force in political socialization, subtly shaping readers' beliefs and attitudes. The manuscript also addresses the dynamic interplay between the socio-political environment and literature, emphasizing how social circumstances influence writers and the themes they explore. During times of significant social change, such as the breakup of Yugoslavia, Serbian literature has reflected and critiqued the evolving political landscape, offering unique narratives that resonate with the collective experiences of the people. In conclusion, the manuscript asserts that literature, born from a specific socio-political context, not only reflects the realities of its time but also has the power to shape values, ideologies, and perceptions of social order. Through its rich and layered storytelling, literature invites readers to critically examine societal norms, history, and ideological constructs, potentially altering their views and contributing to the broader cultural and political discourse.
References
Паунић, Станислав, прев. 2002. Држава. Београд: БИГЗ.
Baker, Carlos. 1980. “The Spanish Tragedy.” In Hemingway: The Writer as Artist, 223–63. Princeton University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1nxcv1g.14.
Barberá, Pablo, John T Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua Tucker, Richard Bonneau. 2015. “Tweeting from Left to Right.” Psychological Science 26 (10): 1531–1542. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615594620.
Bart, Rolan. 2018. „Smrt autora.” U Ljubav i pisanje po Rolanu Bartu, prir. Dejan Aničić. Beograd: Karpos.
Belfiore, Eleonora, and Oliver Bennett. 2009. “Researching the Social Impact of the Arts: Literature, Fiction and the Novel.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 15 (1): 17–33. DOI:10.1080/10286630802322386.
Cao, Xiaoxia. 2015. “The Influence of Fiction Versus Nonfiction on Political Attitudes.” Communication Research Reports 32 (1): 83–92. DOI:10.1080/08824096.2014.989979
Caracciolo, Marco, and Thom Van Duuren. 2015. “Changed by Literature? A Critical Review of Psychological Research on the Effects of Reading Fiction.” Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 17 (4): 517–539. DOI: 10.5325/intelitestud.17.4.0517.
Escalas, Edson Jennifer. 2004. “Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (1–2): 168–180. DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_19.
Felski, Rita. 2019. “Identifying with characters.” In Character: Three Inquiries in Literary Studies, eds. Amanda Anderson, Rita Felski and Toril Moi, 77–126. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/9780226658834-003
Galloway, Susan. 2009. “Theory-Based Evaluation and the Social Impact of the Arts.” Cultural Trends 18 (2): 125–148. DOI: 10.1080/09548960902826143.
Greenwalt, Kyle. 2009. “Identity: The Case of France.” Harvard Educational Review 79 (3): 494–520. DOI: 10.17763/haer.79.3.43261g133731p248.
Hammack, Phillip. 2008. “Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 12 (3): 222–247. DOI: 10.1177/1088868308316892.
Huang, Kate, Helene Fung, and Peifeng Sun. 2024. “The Effect of Audience–Character Similarity on Identification with Narrative Characters: A Meta-Analysis.” Current Psychology 43: 7026–7043. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-023-04842-4.
Jakšić, Aleksandra. 2023. „Nobelova nagrada 2023: Da li će pobediti književnost ili politika?” RT Balkan. 5. oktobar 2023. https://lat.rt.rs/kultura/53242-nobelova-nagrada-knjizevnost-predvidjanja-2023/.
Kurir. 2014. „Vladimir Kecmanović: Film Top je bio vreo uništio je i izneverio poentu mog romana.” Kurir. 25. mart 2014. https://www.kurir.rs/zabava/pop-kultura/1291757/vladimir-kecmanovic-film-top-je-bio-vreo-unistio-je-i-izneverio-poentu-mog-romana.
László, János. 2013. Historical Tales and National Identity: An Introduction to Narrative Social Psychology. New York: Routledge.
Murdoch, Iris. 1970. The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Norris, David. 2016. Haunted Serbia: Representations of History and War in the Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Modern Humanities Research Association; New York: Routledge.
Petty, Richard, and John Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Leonard Berkowitz, 124–129. London: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2.
Piaget, Jean. 1985. [1975]. The Equilibration of Cognitive Structures: The Central Problem of Intellectual Development. Translated by T. Brown and K. J. Thampy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rush, Fred. 2009. “Literature and Politics.” In The Oxford handbook of philosophy and literature, eds. Richard Thomas Eldridge, 496–516. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195182637.003.0023.
Strauss, Leo. 1964. The City and Man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van Nieuwenhuyse, Karel, and Kaat Wils. 2015. “Historical Narratives and National Identities.” Journal of Belgian History / Revue Belge d'Histoire Contemporaine 45 (4): 40–73.
Young, I. F., and D. Sullivan. 2016. “Competitive Victimhood: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature.” Current Opinion in Psychology 11: 30–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.004.