UPRAVLJANJE ENERGETSKOM EFIKASNOŠĆU U ŽELEZNIČKOM TRANSPORTU

  • Ljiljana M Kontic University Union, Faculty of Legal and Business Studies, Novi Sad
  • Dragan Vukasovic Nezavisni Univerzitet Banja Luka
  • Djordje Vidicki Vlada Vojvodine

Abstract


Efikasan transport kljucna je komponenta ekonomskog razvoja, kako globalno tako i lokalno posmatrano. Koriscenje elektricne energije u zeleznickom preduzecu za prevoz transporta moze se posmatrati sa vise razlicitih aspekata. Kao sto svaki oblik transporta ima svoje fiksne i varijabilne troskove tako i svaka energetska potrosnja ima svoju logiku. Lokomotive koje preuzimaju elektricnu energiju po pravilu gube jedan deo iskoriscene energije za sopstveno pokretanje i transmisioni mehanizam. Upravo ti prazni hodovi predstavljaju znacajnu stavku u ukupnim troskovima energije. Osnovni cilj ovog rada je da identifikujemo model upravljanja energetskom efikasnoscu u zeleznickom transportu. Koriscen je model proste linearne regresije, kao model predvidjanja, da odredimo buducu potrosnju, a samim tim i troskove koji se odnose na elektricnu energiju. Informacionu osnovu cine relevantni meta podaci prikupljeni iz statistickih baza podataka, na osnovu kojih smo formulisali i izvrsili ekstrapolaciju regresionog modela. Ukazali smo i na ogranicenja i pravce buducih istrazivanja.

Author Biographies

Ljiljana M Kontic, University Union, Faculty of Legal and Business Studies, Novi Sad

Ljiljana Kontic is an Associate Professor in Strategic and Innovation Management at the Faculty of Legal and Business Studies. She holds Ph.D. in Strategic Management from University of Belgrade, Faculty of Economics. Her main research focuses on strategic organizational behavior, innovation management and privatization and restructuring important in transitional economies. She is a member of European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS).

Dragan Vukasovic, Nezavisni Univerzitet Banja Luka
vanredni profesor

References

Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Thompson, W. L. (2000), Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64 (4), 912–923. doi: 10.2307/3803199.

Amstrong, J. S. (2007), Significance tests harm progress in forcasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 23 (2), 321–327. doi: 10.1016/ijforecast. 2007.03.004

Baumgartner, J., Prices and costs in the Railway sector. EPEL, January 2001.

Kiš, T. Radovanov, B., Statistika i ekonometrija finansijskih tržišta, Ekonomski fakultet Subotica, 2014.

Lovrić, M., Komić, J. i Stević, S., Statistička analiza metodi i primjena, Ekonomski fakultet Banja Luka, 2006.

Ziliak, S. T. & McCloskey, D. N., The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the standard error cost us jobs, justice, and lives. University of Michigan Press, 2008.

Rushton, S. P., Ormerod, S.J., & Kerby, G. (2004). New paradigms for modelling species distributions, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41 (2), 193–200. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00903.x

Šošić I., Statistika, Školska knjiga, Zagreb, 2006.

International Railway Journal, Railway Gazette International, Modern Railways, 1999.

World Bank, The Railway Reform: Toolkit for Improving Railway Sector Performance, The World Bank, Washington D. C., 2011.

Railway Finance: http://www.railway-technical.com/finance.shtml (access: 24. 5. 2017)

Published
2018/10/10
Section
Original Scientific Paper