PRISTUPANJE KONCEPTU TIHOG ODUSTAJANJA IZ PERSPEKTIVE RADNOG PRAVA: STUDIJA SLUČAJA MAĐARSKOG I SRPSKOG ZAKONODAVSTVA

Bernadett Dr. Solymosi-Szekeres; Sanja Stojković Zlatanović

doi:10.5937/pravzap0-50313

Bernadett Dr. Solymosi-Szekeres Assistant Professor, University of Miskolc, Faculty of Law, Hungary
Sanja Stojković Zlatanović Senior Research Associate, Institute of Social Sciences, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-50313

Keywords: tiho odustajanje, kultura gužve, kultura stalne dostupnosti, radnopravna perspektiva, povreda ugovora o radu, mađarsko zakonodavstvo, srpsko zakonodavstvo

Abstract

U radu se primenom pravnoteorijskog, normativnog i komparativnog metoda analizira fenomen takozvanog tihog odustajanja, kao i njegov nastanak i razvoj. S tim u vezi, posebno se sagledava kako se fenomen tihog odustajanja posmatra u okvirima nauke radnog prava, a na primerima normativnih rešenja mađarskog i srpskog radnog zakonodavstva vezano za regulisanje prava i obaveza na radu. Tiho odustajanje smatra se psihološkim odgovorom pojedinca-radnika na kulturu gužve i kulturu stalne dostupnosti. Osim toga, predstavlja poseban mehanizam samozaštite u eri digitalizovanog sveta rada, gde radnik, u ovom slučaju, obavlja minimum radnih obaveza, ali sve u okvirima onih definisanih ugovorom o radu. Stoga se teško može argumentovati povreda radnih obaveza i dužnosti u smislu negativnih posledica po radnopravni status i, eventualnog, otkaza ugovora o radu od strane poslodavca.

References

Bibliography

Arar, T., Çetiner, N., Yurdakul, G., 2023, Quiet Quitting: Building a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework, Journal of Academic Researches and Studies, Vol. 15, No. 28, pp. 122–138.

Balkeran, A., 2020, Hustle Culture and the Implications for Our Workforce, Master Thesis, The City University of New York Faculty, Weissman School of Arts and Sciences.

Bankó, Z. et al., 2019, Nagykommentár a munka törvénykönyvéről szóló 2012. évi I. törvényhez, Budapest, Wolters Kluwer.

Barber, L., Kuykendall, L., Santuzzi, A., 2023, How Managers Can Reduce “Always on” Work Stress in Teams: An Optimal Work Availability Framework, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 52, Issue 3, pp. 1–11.

Bell, R. L., Kennebrew, D., 2023, What Does Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Chester I. Barnard Have to Do With Quiet Quitting?, American Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–8.

Biregeyi, J., Hadzic, S., Landin, S., 2023, Beyond the Pandemic: Exploring Quiet Quitting in the Remote Work Era, Bachelor Thesis, Jönköping University International Business School.

Formica, S., Sfodera, F., 2022, The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting Paradigm Shifts: An Overview of Current Situation and Future Research Directions, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 899–907.

Kovačević, Lj., 2016, Valjani razlozi za otkaz ugovora o radu, Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Kun, A., 2018, The Principle of ‘Equitable Assessment’ in Hungarian Labour Law − How to Make it Work?, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 40–57.

Lerouge, L., Truillo Pons, F., 2022, Contribution to the Study on the ‘Right to Disconnect’ from Work. Are France and Spain Examples for Other Countries and EU Law?, European Labour Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 450–465.

Leszkoven, L., 2022, Becsülettel, emberséggel... A jóhiszeműség és tisztesség elve és annak „elágazásai” a kötelemszerű magatartás körében, Gazdaság és Jog, Vol. 2022, Nos. 9–10, pp. 5–10.

Lopes, H., 2018, The Moral Dimensions of the Employment Relationship: Institutional Implications, Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 103–125.

Lubarda, B., 2012, Radno pravo, Rasprava o dostojanstvu na radu i socijalnom dijalogu, Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Mahand, T., Caldwell, C., 2023, Quiet Quitting – Causes and Opportunities, Business and Management Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 9–19.

Pellerin, S. et al., 2023, The Right to Disconnect, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, pp. 41–45.

Stojković Zlatanović, S., Sovilj, R., 2023, Dužnost lojalnosti i klauzula (anti) konkurencije u radnom i kompanijskom pravu, Strani pravni život, 3, pp. 523– 549.

Stojković Zlatanović, S., Škobo, M., 2024, The ‘Twilight’ of Health, Safety, and Well-being of Workers in the Digital Era – Shaping the Right to Disconnect, Journal of Work Health and Safety Regulation, February 6.

Yuningsih, Y., Prasetya, M. D., Technology Makes Hustle Culture Still Happened in Pandemic Covid 19, in: Napitupulu, D., Sutabri, T., Abdullah, D., (eds.), 2022, ICEBE 2021: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Economics, Busi- ness, and Entrepreneurship, ICEBE 2021, 7 October 2021, Lampung, Indonesia. Lampung, European Alliance for Innovation, pp. 475–482.

Legislative Sources

Act No. I. of 2012 on the Labor Code (Hungary)

Labor Law, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009, 32/2013, 75/2014, 13/2017 – the Decision of the Constitutional Court, 113/2017 and 95/2018.

Case Law

BH 2015. 334.

Serbian Supreme Court, Judgment of 7 February 2018, 441/2017.

Internet Sources

Australian Unions, 2021, The Verdict Is in: Safe Workplaces Are Union Workplaces, (https://www.australianunions.org.au/2021/11/17/the-verdict-is-in-safe-work- places-are-union-workplaces/, 30. 5. 2024).

Australian Unions, 2022, Work Shouldn’t Hurt, (https://www.australianunions. org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-WSH-Survey-Report.pdf, 30. 5. 2024).

Barna, E., 2020, Ki lehet-e rúgni valakit bizalomvesztésre hivatkozva?, (https://www. hrportal.hu/hr/ki-lehet-e-rugni-valakit-bizalomvesztesre-hivatkozva-20200309. html, 30. 5. 2024).

Dobosi, K., 2023, Létszámleépítés és a felmondás indokolása, (https://jogaszvilag. hu/cegvilag/letszamleepites-es-a-felmondas-indokolasa/, 20. 5. 2024).

Hajdu-Dudás, M., 2021, Alapelvek funkciói a munkajogban, (https://adozona.hu/munkajog/Alapelvek_a_munkajogban_W6B9TN, 4. 2. 2024).

Harter, J., 2023, Is Quiet Quitting Real?, (https://www.gallup.com/work- place/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx, 12. 3. 2024).

Honti, B., 2021, A munkaviszony megszüntetése: a felmondás szabályai, az azonna- li hatályú felmondás, a végkielégítés és a jogellenes felmondás, p. 14, (https://www.jogpontok.hu/download/A_munkaviszony_megszuntetese.pdf, 10. 3. 2024).

Kanning, U. P., 2023, Quiet Quitting ist keine innere Kündigung, (https://bit. ly/3ZIdB0Z, 19. 1. 2024).

Kártyás, G., 2014, Pontosodnak a munkajogi alapelvek, (https://ado.hu/munkau- gyek/pontosodnak-a-munkajogi-alapelvek/, 30. 5. 2024).

Masterson, V., 2022, What Is Quiet Quitting?, (https://www.weforum.org/agen- da/2022/09/tiktok-quiet-quitting-explained/, 10. 2. 2024).

Pollack, S., 2022, Antiwork and the Rejection of Hustle Culture: A Guide for HR Leaders, (https://muckrack.com/stacy-pollack/articles, 15. 1. 2024).

Susarla, R. M., 2022, What’s with the Millennials? Quiet Quitting, the Great Resig- nation, and Now, Moonlighting! Slackers or Pioneers of a New Era of Work and Life?, (https://bit.ly/3TRVVyB, 15. 1. 2024).

Szabó, G., 2021, Bizalomvesztés miatti munkáltatói felmondás, (https://kocsissza- bougyved.hu/bizalomvesztes-miatti-munkaltatoi-felmondas/, 30. 5. 2024).

Vos, M. de, 2018, Work 4.0 and the Future of Labour Law, (https://ssrn.com/ab- stract=3217834, 22. 2. 2024).

Zenger, J., Folkman, J., 2022, Quiet Quitting Is about Bad Bosses, not Bad Em- ployees, Harvard Business Review, (https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is- about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees, 21. 1. 2024).