APPROACHING QUIET QUITTING FROM THE LABOR LAW PERSPECTIVE: A CASE STUDY OF HUNGARIAN AND SERBIAN LEGISLATION

  • Bernadett Dr. Solymosi-Szekeres Assistant Professor, University of Miskolc, Faculty of Law, Hungary
  • Sanja Stojković Zlatanović Senior Research Associate, Institute of Social Sciences, Serbia
Ključne reči: Quiet quitting, Hustle culture, Always-on culture, Labor law perspective, Employment contract breach, Hungarian legislation, Serbian legislation

Sažetak


The paper explores the quiet quitting phenomenon, its origin, and evolution, by applying theoretical, legal normative, and comparative methods. It particularly examines how quiet quitting can be understood through the lens of labor law, by analyzing the provisions of Hungarian and Serbian labor legislation dealing with worker’s rights and duties. Quiet quitting has been considered workers’ psychological response to hustle culture and always-on expectations. It is a specific self-protection mechanism in a digitalized world of work, wherein the worker fulfills only the minimum work duties, without going above and beyond the employment contract. Therefore, it is hard to argue for the employment contract breach whereas approaching from an organizational management perspective is much more adequate, while also applying the decent work approach.

Reference

Bibliography

Arar, T., Çetiner, N., Yurdakul, G., 2023, Quiet Quitting: Building a Comprehensive Theoretical Framework, Journal of Academic Researches and Studies, Vol. 15, No. 28, pp. 122–138.

Balkeran, A., 2020, Hustle Culture and the Implications for Our Workforce, Master Thesis, The City University of New York Faculty, Weissman School of Arts and Sciences.

Bankó, Z. et al., 2019, Nagykommentár a munka törvénykönyvéről szóló 2012. évi I. törvényhez, Budapest, Wolters Kluwer.

Barber, L., Kuykendall, L., Santuzzi, A., 2023, How Managers Can Reduce “Always on” Work Stress in Teams: An Optimal Work Availability Framework, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 52, Issue 3, pp. 1–11.

Bell, R. L., Kennebrew, D., 2023, What Does Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Chester I. Barnard Have to Do With Quiet Quitting?, American Journal of Management, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 1–8.

Biregeyi, J., Hadzic, S., Landin, S., 2023, Beyond the Pandemic: Exploring Quiet Quitting in the Remote Work Era, Bachelor Thesis, Jönköping University International Business School.

Formica, S., Sfodera, F., 2022, The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting Paradigm Shifts: An Overview of Current Situation and Future Research Directions, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 899–907.

Kovačević, Lj., 2016, Valjani razlozi za otkaz ugovora o radu, Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Kun, A., 2018, The Principle of ‘Equitable Assessment’ in Hungarian Labour Law − How to Make it Work?, Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 40–57.

Lerouge, L., Truillo Pons, F., 2022, Contribution to the Study on the ‘Right to Disconnect’ from Work. Are France and Spain Examples for Other Countries and EU Law?, European Labour Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 450–465.

Leszkoven, L., 2022, Becsülettel, emberséggel... A jóhiszeműség és tisztesség elve és annak „elágazásai” a kötelemszerű magatartás körében, Gazdaság és Jog, Vol. 2022, Nos. 9–10, pp. 5–10.

Lopes, H., 2018, The Moral Dimensions of the Employment Relationship: Institutional Implications, Journal of Institutional Economics, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 103–125.

Lubarda, B., 2012, Radno pravo, Rasprava o dostojanstvu na radu i socijalnom dijalogu, Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Mahand, T., Caldwell, C., 2023, Quiet Quitting – Causes and Opportunities, Business and Management Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 9–19.

Pellerin, S. et al., 2023, The Right to Disconnect, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, pp. 41–45.

Stojković Zlatanović, S., Sovilj, R., 2023, Dužnost lojalnosti i klauzula (anti) konkurencije u radnom i kompanijskom pravu, Strani pravni život, 3, pp. 523– 549.

Stojković Zlatanović, S., Škobo, M., 2024, The ‘Twilight’ of Health, Safety, and Well-being of Workers in the Digital Era – Shaping the Right to Disconnect, Journal of Work Health and Safety Regulation, February 6.

Yuningsih, Y., Prasetya, M. D., Technology Makes Hustle Culture Still Happened in Pandemic Covid 19, in: Napitupulu, D., Sutabri, T., Abdullah, D., (eds.), 2022, ICEBE 2021: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of Economics, Busi- ness, and Entrepreneurship, ICEBE 2021, 7 October 2021, Lampung, Indonesia. Lampung, European Alliance for Innovation, pp. 475–482.

Legislative Sources

Act No. I. of 2012 on the Labor Code (Hungary)

Labor Law, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 24/2005, 61/2005, 54/2009, 32/2013, 75/2014, 13/2017 – the Decision of the Constitutional Court, 113/2017 and 95/2018.

Case Law

BH 2015. 334.

Serbian Supreme Court, Judgment of 7 February 2018, 441/2017.

Internet Sources

Australian Unions, 2021, The Verdict Is in: Safe Workplaces Are Union Workplaces, (https://www.australianunions.org.au/2021/11/17/the-verdict-is-in-safe-work- places-are-union-workplaces/, 30. 5. 2024).

Australian Unions, 2022, Work Shouldn’t Hurt, (https://www.australianunions. org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-WSH-Survey-Report.pdf, 30. 5. 2024).

Barna, E., 2020, Ki lehet-e rúgni valakit bizalomvesztésre hivatkozva?, (https://www. hrportal.hu/hr/ki-lehet-e-rugni-valakit-bizalomvesztesre-hivatkozva-20200309. html, 30. 5. 2024).

Dobosi, K., 2023, Létszámleépítés és a felmondás indokolása, (https://jogaszvilag. hu/cegvilag/letszamleepites-es-a-felmondas-indokolasa/, 20. 5. 2024).

Hajdu-Dudás, M., 2021, Alapelvek funkciói a munkajogban, (https://adozona.hu/munkajog/Alapelvek_a_munkajogban_W6B9TN, 4. 2. 2024).

Harter, J., 2023, Is Quiet Quitting Real?, (https://www.gallup.com/work- place/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx, 12. 3. 2024).

Honti, B., 2021, A munkaviszony megszüntetése: a felmondás szabályai, az azonna- li hatályú felmondás, a végkielégítés és a jogellenes felmondás, p. 14, (https://www.jogpontok.hu/download/A_munkaviszony_megszuntetese.pdf, 10. 3. 2024).

Kanning, U. P., 2023, Quiet Quitting ist keine innere Kündigung, (https://bit. ly/3ZIdB0Z, 19. 1. 2024).

Kártyás, G., 2014, Pontosodnak a munkajogi alapelvek, (https://ado.hu/munkau- gyek/pontosodnak-a-munkajogi-alapelvek/, 30. 5. 2024).

Masterson, V., 2022, What Is Quiet Quitting?, (https://www.weforum.org/agen- da/2022/09/tiktok-quiet-quitting-explained/, 10. 2. 2024).

Pollack, S., 2022, Antiwork and the Rejection of Hustle Culture: A Guide for HR Leaders, (https://muckrack.com/stacy-pollack/articles, 15. 1. 2024).

Susarla, R. M., 2022, What’s with the Millennials? Quiet Quitting, the Great Resig- nation, and Now, Moonlighting! Slackers or Pioneers of a New Era of Work and Life?, (https://bit.ly/3TRVVyB, 15. 1. 2024).

Szabó, G., 2021, Bizalomvesztés miatti munkáltatói felmondás, (https://kocsissza- bougyved.hu/bizalomvesztes-miatti-munkaltatoi-felmondas/, 30. 5. 2024).

Vos, M. de, 2018, Work 4.0 and the Future of Labour Law, (https://ssrn.com/ab- stract=3217834, 22. 2. 2024).

Zenger, J., Folkman, J., 2022, Quiet Quitting Is about Bad Bosses, not Bad Em- ployees, Harvard Business Review, (https://hbr.org/2022/08/quiet-quitting-is- about-bad-bosses-not-bad-employees, 21. 1. 2024).

Objavljeno
2024/07/09
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni članak