FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF THE DOMINANT POLITICAL-PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTIONS OF JUSTICE

  • Dragica Vujadinović Professor, University of Belgrade Faculty of Law, Serbia
Ključne reči: Aristotle, Plato, Justice, Patriarchy, Private–Public Dichotomy, Dialectic of Patriarchy and Emancipation, Family Justice, Gender Justice, Intersectionality

Sažetak


The aim of this article is to explore prevalent absence of conceptions of gender justice within mainstream political theories and to point out the crucial importance of gender justice for theories of justice and for practicing justice. The first part explains Aristotle’s theory of justice and offers the feminist critique. Plato’s theory of justice explained in Republic, with ideas about philosopher queens, is examined in the second part. The third part discusses premodern and some contemporary theories of justice that preserve patriarchal patterns of devaluating women within a private–public dichotomy, while the fourth part presents the mainstream and feminist theories of justice that overcome a dominant pattern and affirm gender justice in a converging manner. The concluding remarks sum up the crucial role of gender justice for benchmarking further philosophizing on justice.

Reference

Bibliography

Aristotle, 1998, Nikomahova etika, translated by Ladan, T., Zagreb, Globus.

Beitz, C. R., 2009, The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Campbell, B., 2013, End of Equality – The Only Way is Women’s Liberation, London, New York, Calcutta, Seagull Books.

Crenshaw, K., 1989, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University Chicago Legal Forum, pp. 139–167.

Crenshaw, K. et al., 1995. Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, New York, New Press.

D’Entreves, A. P., 2009, Natural Rights – An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, 8th ed., New Brunswick, Transaction Publisher.

Fraser, N., 1997, Justice Interruptus, Abingdon, Routledge.

Green, P., 1985, Retrieving Democracy, Abingdon, Routledge.

Hill Collins, P., Bilge, S., 2016, Intersectionality, Cambridge, Polity Press.

Hill Collins, P., 2019, Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory, Durham, Duke University Press.

Moyn, S., 2010a, The Last Utopia – Human Rights in History, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Myon, S., 2010b, Human Rights in History, The Nation, 11 August.

Nichomachean Ethic (translated by Ross, W.D.), in: Тhe Works of Aristotle, 1952, (translated into English under the editorship of Ross, W.D.), Clarendon, Cornell University Press (digitalized, 2014), pp. 2536–2787.

Okin, S. M., Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family, in: Shanley, M. L., Pateman, C., 1997, Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory, University Park, Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 11–31.

Okin, S. M., 1989, Justice, Gender and the Family, New York, Basic Books.

Offen, K., 2000, European Feminisms, 1700–1950: A Political History, Redwood Press, Stanford University Press.

Plato, 1926, Laws, translated by Bury, R. G., Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

Politics (translated by Jowett, B.), in: Тhe Works of Aristotle, 1952, (translated into English under the editorship of Ross, W. D.), Clarendon, Cornell University Press (digitalized, 2014), pp. 2788–3049.

Rawls, J., 1999 (1971), Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

The Republic of Plato, 1961, (translated by Bloom, A.), New York, Oxford University Press.

Vujadinović, D., Human Rights: A Dworkinian View, in: Jovanović, M., Vujadinović, D., (eds.), 2013, Identity, Political and Human Rights Culture as Prerequisites of Constitutional Democracy, The Hague, Eleven International Publishing, pp. 95–117.

Vujadinović, D., Feminist Reconsideration of Political Theories, in: Vujadinovic, D., Cuvillo, A. A. del, Strand, S., 2023a, Feminist Approaches to Law – Theoretical and Historical Insights, Springer Nature Switzerland, Springer Cham, pp. 1–30.

Vujadinovic, D., Theoretical-methodological Premises of the Feminist Perspective, in: Carapezza Figlia, G. et al., 2023b, Gendering Law: Challenges and Perspectives, Actualidad Juridica Iberoamericana Journal, 19 bis, pp. 12–49.

Vujadinovic, D., Zaharijevic, A., Gender Justice: Reassessing Theories of Justice from Feminist Perspectives, in: Lacey, N. et al., 2024 (forthcoming), Reassessing Feminist Legal Theories, Springer Nature Switzerland, Springer Cham.

Walzer, M., 1983, Spheres of Justice, New York, Basic Books.

Young, I. M. 2004, Five Phases of Oppression, in: Heldke, L., O’Connor, P., (eds.), Oppression, Privilege, and Resistance: Theoretical Perspectives on Racism, Sexism, and Heterosexism, Boston, McGraw Hill, pp. 37–63.

Young, I. M., 2011, Responsibility for Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Objavljeno
2024/07/09
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak