"The Mill on the Floss" - the critique of the concept of education in Victorian Great Britain

  • Nataša V. Ninčetović University of Priština - Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica
Keywords: education, commodity, individuality, women's education, guidance

Abstract


George  Eliot  was  not  only  a  significant  Victorian  writer, but  primarily   an  intellectual. She thought  that  literature  had  an  important  role   in  the  reform  of  society, the moral  and  educational  function. Eliot  interwove  her  views  on  the direction  in  which  the  society  should  move  in  her  works, so  that  the  analysis  of  her  opus  cannot  be  separated  from  the  social  circumstances  in  Victorian  Great  Britain. The  aim  of  this  work  is  to  imply at  the  fact  that  by  means  of  The  Mill  on  the  Floss  George Eliot indirectly criticized  the  official  concept  of  education  of  the  Victorian  era. The  starting  point  of  our  research  is  an  overview  of   the  state  of  society, followed  up  by George  Eliot's  attitudes  towards  the  question  of  education, which  can  be  found  in  her  essays  and  letters. The  Mill  on  the  Floss is  a  picturesque  illustration  of  George  Eliot's  beliefs  that  education  should  be  reformed, as  well  as  of  the  need  of  a  different  approach  to  this  extremely  important  question. The  implication  of  this  novel  is  that  education  needs  to  be  appropriate  to  the  requisites  and  competences  of  the  student, but  also  that  education  mustn't  be  reduced   to  a commodity, so  that  we  should  raise  the  awareness  that  education  has  a  much  more  important  and  wider  role  than mere acquisition  of  a  degree  and  means  that  will  faciliate  easier  employment.

References

Alley, H. (1979). The Complete and Incomplete Educations of the Mill on the Floss. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 33(4), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1347669 

Briggs, A. (1999). A social history of England (3. ed). Penguin Books.
Chapman, R. (1968). The Victorian debate: English literature and society 1832-1901. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Davies, E. (2003). Higher Education of Women 1866. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dolin, T. (2009). George Eliot. Oxford university press.
Eliot, G. (1855). Margaret Fuller and Mary Wollstonecraft*. In Mary Wollstonecraft (pp. 988–989). Routledge. http://georgeeliotarchive.org/items/show/94 

Eliot, G. (1856). Silly Novels by Lady Novelists. Westminster Review, LXVI, 442–461.
Eliot, G. (2005). Letter IV, V. In A. S. Byatt (Ed.), Selected essays, poems and other writings. Penguin Books.
Gargano, E. (2013). Education. In M. Harris (Ed.), George Eliot in Context (pp. 113–121). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019491.017 

Jones, K. (1995). Education, class and gender in George Eliot and Thomas Hardy [Doktorska disertacija, University of New Hampshire]. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1875 

Kucich, J. (2000). Intellectual debate in the Victorian novel: Religion, science, and the professional. In D. David (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel (pp. 212–233). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521641500.011 

Mill, J. S. (2017). The Subjection of Women. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351302524

Page, N. (1993). Writers in their Time: George Eliot. The Macmillan Press.
Rignall, J. (2011). George Eliot. In A. Poole (Ed.), Scott, Dickens, Eliot, Hardy: Great Shakespeareans: Vol. V (1st ed., pp. 95–138). Continuum; Bloomsbury Collections. http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/scott-dickens-eliot-hardy-great-shakespeareans-volume-v/ch3-george-eliot/ 

Robertson, L. (1985). IGNORANCE AND POWER: George Eliot’s Attack on Professional Incompetence. The George Eliot Review, 24, 100–105.
Thomson, P. (1956). The Victorian heroine: A changing ideal, 1837-1873. Oxford Univ. Press.
Елиот, Џ. (1984). Воденица на Флоси (А. Николић, Trans.). Минерва.

Published
2021/12/31
Section
Review Paper