The Influence of Pets on the Moral Development of Students

  • Marija J. Tomić University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Philosophy
Keywords: moral development, pets, gender of students

Abstract


Considering the increasing moral hypocrisy of the modern era, it was necessary to focus on the examination of various influences on moral development. Lack of empathy is a phenomenon that is often mentioned when talking about various social deviations. Lack of tolerance, peer violence, various forms of aggressive behavior are sufficient reason to examine morality even at primary school age. This was the main motive for a more detailed investigation level of moral development of elementary school students in Banja Luka. The research was conducted on a sample of 220 eighth and ninth grade students. Based on a short questionnaire and a scale of moral development, the level of development of each student was determined, as well as the gender and type of pet they owned. The final school grades was chosen based on the theoretical analyzes of various psychologists, who specify that age as the end of moral development. In the first part, the paper deals with the theoretical reflection and analysis of previous research, while in the methodological part the hypotheses and the obtained results are analyzed in detail. After the statistical processing of the data, it was determined that there is no statistically significant connection in the level of moral development depending on whether the students have a pet or not. A surprising fact is that more boys than girls have a pet. Although the difference is not statistically significant, it leaves space for the researcher to explore possible causes. An interesting fact is that students who have a rabbit as a pet achieve the highest results on the scale of moral development, followed by students with a dog and a parrot, while those who have a cat or no pet at all achieve the lowest results

References

Azenić, A. (2016). Odgojno-obrazovna uloga kućnog ljubimca [Info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek. Faculty of Education]. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:141:081779

Barton Ross, C., & Baron-Sorensen, J. (2007). Pet loss and human emotion: A guide to recovery (2nd ed). Routledge.

Burić, H. (2006). Uloga kućnih ljubimaca u povećanju ljudske dobrobiti: Utjecaj na razvoj djeteta. Dijete, vrtić, obitelj : Časopis za odgoj i naobrazbu predškolske djece namijenjen stručnjacima i roditeljima, 12(46), 2–5.

Furlan, I., Kljaić, S., Kolesarić, V., Krizmanić, M., Szabo, S., & Šverko, B. (2005). Psihologijski rječnik (B. Petz, Ed.; 2. izmijenjeno i dopunjeno izd). Naklada Slap.

Hall, S. S., Gee, N. R., & Mills, D. S. (2016). Children Reading to Dogs: A Systematic Review of the Literature. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0149759. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149759

Khalid, A., & Naqvi, I. (2016). Relationship between Pet Attachment and Empathy among Young Adults. Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 26, 66–81.

Lakatoš, M., & Vejmelka, L. (2018). Značaj životinja za djecu: Implikacije za pomagačke profesije. Ljetopis Socijalnog Rada, 25(1), 101–130. https://doi.org/10.3935/ljsr.v25i1.197

McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2001). Children’s representations of pets in their social networks. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00202.x

Melson, G. F., & Fogel, A. F. (1996). Parental Perceptions of their Children’s Involvement with Household Pets: A Test of a Specificity Model of Nurturance. Anthrozoös, 9(2–3), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279396787001545

Melson, G. F., Peet, S., & Sparks, C. (1991). Children’s Attachment to Their Pets: Links to Socio-Emotional Development. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 8(2), 55–65.

Odendaal, J. S. J. (2000). Animal-assisted therapy—Magic or medicine? Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 49(4), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3999(00)00183-5

Rothenberg, B. B. (1968). Children’s social sensitivity and the relationship to interpersonal competence, intrapersonal comfort and intellectual level. Educational Testing Service.

Serpell, J. A. (2005). People in Disguise: Anthropomorphism and the Human- Pet Relationship. In L. Daston & G. Mitman (Eds.), Thinking with animals: New perspectives on anthropomorphism (pp. 121–136). Columbia University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bdd2f34f-11af-e611-80c7-005056af4099

Sertić, V. (1977). Vaši kućni ljubimci (Č. Smokvina-Boranić & A. Forenbacher, Eds.). Znanje.

Sindik, J., & Laušić, V. (2006). Uloga kućnih ljubimaca u razvoju djeteta. Dijete, vrtić, obitelj : Časopis za odgoj i naobrazbu predškolske djece namijenjen stručnjacima i roditeljima, 12(46), 11–13.

Smojver-Ažić, S., & Topalović, Z. (2010). Uloga kućnih ljubimaca u socioemocionalnom razvoju djece školskog uzrasta. Napredak : Časopis za interdisciplinarna istraživanja u odgoju i obrazovanju, 151(2), 171–194.

Spencer, S., Decuypere, E., Aerts, S., & De Tavernier, J. (2006). History and Ethics of Keeping Pets: Comparison with Farm Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4379-8

Wilson, E. O. (1994). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Harvard Univ. Press.

Published
2024/05/22
Section
Original Scientific Paper