Conscious or indifferent – concerns on digitalisation and sustainability among SMEs in Industry 4.0

Keywords: digitainability, digitalisation, SME, sustainability, SDGs, Visegrad Four countries, Serbia, Bulgaria

Abstract


The positive benefits of digitalisation are nowadays generally recognised and acknowledged by companies and are typically seen as essential in a rapidly and constantly changing business environment. Yet the level of digitalisation is still below expectations, especially among small and medium-sized enterprises. Several factors are behind it, ranging from high-cost concerns and management styles to a lack of knowledge etc. The present study reviews one of these aspects, the contradictory relationship between digitalisation and sustainability, with the aim of exploring the potential of digitalisation in the future and outlining new development strategies for small organisations.
This research explores the perceived impact of digitalisation on sustainability based on the opinions of SME owners and managers in the V4 countries, Bulgaria and Serbia, using a quantitative method through a questionnaire survey. Based on their perception on the topic, the surveyed organisations can be divided into two groups (Concerned Inspired, Indifferent Conservatives) and accordingly can achieve a state of balanced digitainability, where both sustainability and digitalisation performance are outstanding with different strategic steps.

Author Biography

Andrea Tick, Óbuda University

Andrea Tick PhD is an associate professor at Óbuda University Keleti Faculty of Business and Management. Her research interests include internet security, cyber security, user behavior regarding digital learning, cyber security awareness and the human factor in cyber security. She also does research in the field of digitalisation and digital transformation among SMEs. She has a BSc in Economics, an MA in Mathematics, Computer Science and English language and literature. Her PhD and Dr. habil research areas are digital teaching and learning with special cyber security awareness.

References

Acciarini, C., Borelli, F., Capo, F., Cappa, F., & Sarrocco, C. (2021). Can digitalization favour the emergence of innovative and sustainable business models? A qualitative exploration in the automotive sector. Journal of Strategy and Management.
Ardito, L., Raby, S., Albino, V., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). The duality of digital and environmental orientations in the context of SMEs: Implications for innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 123, 44-56.
Bai, C., Quayson, M., & Sarkis, J. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic Digitization Lessons for Sustainable Development of Micro-and Small-Enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27, 1989-2001.
Brown, J. D. (2009). Choosing the Right Type of Rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13 (3), 20-25.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.
Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A., & Magnani, G. (2021). Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120650.
Gartner. (2019). Digitalization. Information technology glossary. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/digitalization
Gregori
, P., & Holzmann, P. (2020). Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122817.
Gubán, Á., & Sándor, Á. (2021). Opportunities for digital maturity measurement for SMEs. Management Review, 52 (3), 13-28 (in Hungarian)
Gupta, S., Motlagh, M., & Rhyner, J. (2020). The digitalization sustainability matrix: A participatory research tool for investigating digitainability. Sustainability, 12 (21), 9283.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2021). Digitainability: the combined effects of the megatrends digitalization and sustainability. Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (2), 64-80.
Lu, J.W., & Beamish, P. W. (2006). SME internationalization and performance: Growth vs. profitability. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 27-48.
Marcysiak, A., & Pleskacz, Z. (2021). Determinants of digitization in SMEs. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9 (1), 300.
Mitchell, R. W., Wooliscroft, B., & Higham, J. (2010). Sustainable Market Orientation: A New Approach to Managing Marketing Strategy. Journal of Macromarketing 30 (2), 160–170.
Muñoz, P., & Dimov, D. (2015). The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 30 (4), 632-654.
Park, S. B. (2018). Multinationals and sustainable development: Does internationalization develop corporate sustainability of emerging market multinationals?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27 (8), 1514-1524.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s AlphaWhen Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 273–1296.
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44 (2), 95-105.
Velinov, E., Maly, M., Petrenko, Y., Denisov, I., & Vassilev, V. (2020). The role of top management team digitalization and firm internationalization for sustainable business. Sustainability, 12 (22), 9502.
Zamfir, A. M., Mocanu, C., & Grigorescu, A. (2017). Circular economy and decision models among European SMEs. Sustainability, 9 (9), 1507 .
Zulfikar, R., Widyanti, R., Basuki, B., Mayvita, P. A., & Purboyo, P. (2021). Encourage SMEs sustainable behavior during Covid-19 pandemic through competitive advantages and corporate culture. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2), 45-417.

Published
2022/03/28
Section
Original Scientific Paper