Crowd-based open innovation in telco operators: readiness assessment for smart city service development

  • Željko Sarić Telekom Srbija
  • Vladimir Obradović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organisational Sciences
  • Zorica Bogdanović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organisational Sciences
  • Aleksandra Labus University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organisational Sciences
  • Svetlana Mitrović University of Educons, Faculty of Project and Innovation Management
Keywords: Telco industry, Open innovation, Crowd-based business models, Smart cities

Abstract


This paper studies the readiness of the Serbian telco operators and other stakeholders to implement a crowd-based open innovation business model. Telco companies are facing challenges in terms of market demands and with finding new opportunities to attract subscribers with innovative products and services. These innovations are frequently oriented towards smart city services based on emerging technologies such as Internet of things, cloud computing, software defined networks and blockchain. Due to complexity, pace and costs of research and development, telco operators have already recognized the need to shift from a traditional to an open innovation concept. The development of crowdsourcing models has further fueled the possibility to include customers in the open innovation process, in order to better design and develop services suited to their own needs. With this in mind, the goal of this paper is to propose a crowd-based open innovation business model for improvement of innovation capacities of Serbian telco operators. The proposed model is used as the basis of evaluating the readiness of internal and external stakeholders for participation in open innovation projects. The study is based on the adjusted value-based adoption model, while the analysis is performed using the PLS-SEM method. The results show that participants identify trust as the most influential factor for the perceived value of crowd-based open innovation, while the internal stakeholders of telco companies find expected income and reputation as the most relevant. Both groups have shown a high interest in innovations related to smart city services such as smart traffic and ecology-related services.

References

Abhari, K., Davidson, E., & Xiao, B. (2022). Inventing together: The role of actor goals and platform affordances in open innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 23 (1), 264-302.
Anisic, Z., Koldzin, D., & Freund, R. (2013). How to support open inovations through public policies?. Annals of the Faculty of Engineering Hunedoara, 11 (2), 241-247.
Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., & Galati, F. (2021). The past, present and future of open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24 (4), 1130-1161.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California management review, 60 (2), 5-16.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperatives for Creating and Profiting from Technologies, Harvard business School Press, Boston.
Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.), Open Innovation:Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 1–12
Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds), New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 3-28.
Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2013). Open Innovation 2.0: A New Paradigm–White Paper. In OI2 Conference Paper Open Innovation Strategy and Policy Group (OISPG).
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18 (1), 39-50.
Grimaldi, M., Greco, M., & Cricelli, L. (2021). A framework of intellectual property protection strategies and open innovation. Journal of Business Research, 123, 156-164.
Hair, J.F.J., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M., (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 46(1–2), Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Hallerstede, S.H. (2013). Open innovation intermediaries. In Managing the lifecycle of open innovation platforms. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden. 35-48.
Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2012). Fostering radical innovations with open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (2), 212-231.
Janevski, Z., Davitkovska, E., & Petkovski, V. (2015). Barriers of implementing open innovations in Macedonian SME’s. Economic Development. Journal of the Institute of Economics–Skopje, 3, 93-106.
Kim, H.W., Chan, H.C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision support systems, 43 (1), 111-126.
Malone, T. W., Laubacher, R., & Dellarocas, C. (2010). The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Mangement Review, 51 (3), 21–31.
Mubarak, M.F., & Petraite, M. (2020). Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120332.
Nepelski, D. (2019). How to facilitate digital innovation in Europe. Intereconomics, 54 (1), 47-52.
European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. (2018). In Open Innovation 2.0 Yearbook 2017–2018. European Commission Publications Office: Luxembourg. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/10defd18-d291-11e8-9424-01aa75ed71a1
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, 1. John Wiley & Sons.
Payán-Sánchez, B., Belmonte-Ureña, L. J., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Vazquez-Brust, D., Yakovleva, N., & Pérez-Valls, M. (2021). Open innovation for sustainability or not: Literature reviews of global research trends. Sustainability, 13 (3), 1136.
Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH. Bönningstedt, Germany.
Rosienkiewicz, M., Helman, J., Cholewa, M., & Molasy, M. (2022). Open Readiness Assessment within Students in Poland: Investigating State-of-the-Art and Challenges. Sustainability, 14 (3), 1213.
Saebi, T., & Foss, N. J. (2015). Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. European Management Journal, 33 (3), 201-213.
Sarić, Ž., Miletić, Lj., Janjušić, D., Bubulj, M., Matijašević, J. (2019). Comparison of Perceptions of Barriers to Innovation Projects in the Companies in Serbia. In Obradovic, V., & Todorovic, M. (Eds), Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, Selected papers of the 5th IPMA SENET Project Management Conference (SENET 2019), 108, 251-258.
Shaikh, I., & Randhawa, K. (2022). Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation:Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus. Technovation, 114, 102437.
Singh, S.K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. (2021).Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance.Journal of Business Research, 128, 788-798.
Tremblay, D.G., & Yagoubi, A. (2017). From open innovation to crowd sourcing: A new configuration of collaborative work?. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7 (3), 223-244.
Wang, Y.M., Wang, Y.S., & Wang, Y.Y. (2021). Exploring the determinants of university students’ contribution intention on crowdsourcing platforms: a value maximization perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, in press.
Witt, M. (2017). Boundaries of Open Innovation and Games. In Stieglitz, S., Lattemann, C., Robra-Bissantz, S., Zarnekow, R., & Brockmann, T. (Eds.), Gamification. Springer International Publishing. Cham. 77–91.

Published
2022/03/30
Section
Original Scientific Paper