Participative decision-making, autonomy, and creative performance: Evidence of match-up employee relations between engineers and managers
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the associations between engineers’ perceptions of participative decision-making and autonomy, and their creative performance. The study utilised a paired match-up technique, with engineers and managers as respondents. Managers were responsible for assessing engineers’ creative performance. Due to the study match-up design, questionnaires measuring participative decision-making, autonomy, and creative performance were distributed to the electrical and electronic manufacturing firms. SmartPLS software was used to analyse the hypothesised relationships. The results indicated that engineers’ participative decision-making significantly predicted autonomy dimensions (work schedule, work criterion, and work method). Engineers’ autonomy regarding work schedule, work criterion, and work method had no positive relationship with creative performance. The results showed that engineers’ work schedule, work criterion, and work method negatively mediated the relationships between participative decision-making and creative performance. The findings indicated an insignificant direct effect and negative mediation of engineers’ work schedule, work criterion, and work method on creative performance, pointing to the structured nature of work. This situation leaves engineers with minimal opportunity to determine the work designs, time allocations, and multicriteria of job descriptions. The study recommends potential directions for studying the improvement of engineers’ creative performance in future studies.
References
Bena, J., Dinc, S., & Erel, I. (2022). The international propagation of economic downturns through multinational companies: The real economy channel. Journal of Financial Economics, 146 (1), 277–304.
Berg, S.T.S., Grimstad, A., Škerlavaj, M., & Černe, M. (2017). Social and economic leader–member exchange and employee creative behavior: the role of employee willingness to take risks and emotional carrying capacity. European Management Journal, 35 (5), 676–687.
Breaugh, J.A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38 (6), 551–570.
Brem, A., & Utikal, V. (2019). How to manage creativity time? Results from a social psychological time model lab experiment on individual creative and routine performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28 (3), 291–305.
Brun, J.-P., & Cooper, C. (2009). Encourage and support autonomy and participation in decision making. In Missing Pieces (pp. 113–135). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Byrne, D. (2002). Interpreting quantitative data (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
Chandra Sekhar S.F. (2011). Correlates of work autonomy. The IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior , 10 (3), 26–40.
Charoensukmongkol, P., & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2021). The effectiveness of supervisor support in lessening perceived uncertainties and emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis: the constraining role of organizational intransigence. The Journal of General Psychology, 148 (4), 431–450.
De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). Labour flexibility and innovation, complementary or concurrent strategies? A review of the literature. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 35 (4), 653–666.
De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., & Van Hootegem, G. (2016). Not all autonomy is the same. Different dimensions of job autonomy and their relation to work engagement & innovative work behavior. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 26 (4), 515–527.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2016). Report on survey of manufacturing industries 2015 (Issue June).
European Commission. (2022). Electrical and Electronic Engineering Industries (EEI). Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Retrieved February from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/electrical-and-electronic-engineering-industries-eei_en#:~:text=Electrical%20and%20electronic%20engineering%20industries%20(EEI)%20include%20electrical%20devices%2C,%2C%20sensors%2C%20and%20much%20more.
Fallman, S.L., Jutengren, G., & Dellve, L. (2019). The impact of restricted decision‐making autonomy on health care managers’ health and work performance. Journal of Nursing Management, 27 (4), 706–714.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers [FMM]. (2016). Malaysian industries: FMM Directory 2016. https://mobile.epaperflip.com/?docid=ef37a304-613f-4be9-90a8-a64201730169#page=4
Fischer, S., & Barabasch, A. (2021). Facets of creative potential in selected occupational fields. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 1–19.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29 (3), 430–447.
Genty, K.I., Abioro, M.A., & Shofowora, O. (2021). Job crafting and employees’ performance in MTN Nigeria PLC. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 7 (3), 257–270.
George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 513–524.
Goethel, D.R., Lucey, S.M., Berger, A.M., Gaichas, S.K., Karp, M.A., Lynch, P.D., Walter, J.F., Deroba, J.J., Miller, S., & Wilberg, M.J. (2019). Closing the feedback loop: on stakeholder participation in management strategy evaluation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 76 (10), 1895–1913.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16 (2), 250–279.
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., & Mena, J.A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40 (3), 414–433.
He, J., Zhao, W., Huang, H., & Wang, M. (2022). Market power monitoring in China’s electricity market: an analysis based on the evolutionary game theory. In D. Zhang (Ed.), Fifth International Conference on Mechatronics and Computer Technology Engineering (MCTE 2022) (pp. 1302–1308). SPIE.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–135.
Hocine, Z., & Zhang, J. (2014). Autonomy support: explaining the path from leadership to employee creative performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2 (6), 417–423.
Kahnweiler, W.M., & Thompson, M.A. (2000). Levels of desired, actual, and perceived control of employee involvement in decision making: an empirical investigation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14 (3), 407–427.
Karlberg-Granlund, G. (2019). Exploring the challenge of working in a small school and community: Uncovering hidden tensions. Journal of Rural Studies, 72, 293–305.
Kaveri, M., & Prabakaran, G. (2013). Impact of high performance human resource practices on employees job performance in leather goods manufacturing companies at Vellore District. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 3 (1), 7–12.
Keith, N. (1996). A critical perspective on teacher participation in urban schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32 (1), 45–79.
Kenny, D. A., & Winquist, L. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. Pp. 265–302 in J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement. Mahwah, New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher
Khan, F. (2023). Transformational leadership and teacher work performance: Mediating effect of job autonomy and trust in school principal – insights from senior secondary school data in India. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–21.
Khan, N.A. (2022). To win in the marketplace you must first win in the workplace: An empirical evidence from banking sector [Doctoral thesis, Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus–Senftenberg ]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26127/BTUOpen-5743
Lam, S.S. K., Chen, X.P., & Schaubroeck, J. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: the moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5), 905–914.
Maqsoom, A., Arif, U., Aslam, I., Musarat, M.A., Alaloul, W.S., & Baarimah, A.O. (2021). Green human resource practices on pro-environmental behaviour of workers: Case of Pakistani construction industry. 2021 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Application (DASA), 402–408.
MIDA. (2021). Approved private investments in various economic sectors, January-June 2021 / January-June 2020 / January-December 2020. Malaysian Investment Development Authority. Retrieved September from https://www.mida.gov.my/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Approved-Private-Investments-in-Various-Economic-Sectors_Jan-June_2021.pdf
Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Capabilities, entitlements, rights: Supplementation and critique. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal for People-Centered Development, 12 (1), 23-37.
Pattnaik, S.C., & Sahoo, R. (2021). Employee engagement, creativity and task performance: role of perceived workplace autonomy. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 10 (2), 227–241.
Permata, F.D., & Mangundjaya, W.L. (2021). The role of work engagement in the relationship of job autonomy and proactive work behavior for organizational sustainability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1–11.
Putnam, L.L., Myers, K.K., & Gailliard, B.M. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67 (4), 413–440.
Rese, A., Kopplin, C.S., & Nielebock, C. (2020). Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and creative performance in coworking spaces. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24 (9), 2327–2354.
Rubel, M.R.B., Rimi, N.N., Yusliza, M.Y., & Kee, D.M.H. (2018). High commitment human resource management practices and employee service behaviour: Trust in management as mediator. IIMB Management Review, 30 (4), 316–329.
Scott‐Ladd, B., & Marshall, V. (2004). Participation in decision making: a matter of context? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25 (8), 646–662.
Seymour, G., & Peterman, A. (2018). Context and measurement: an analysis of the relationship between intrahousehold decision making and autonomy. World Development, 111, 97–112.
Shahzad, M.B. (2022). Role of psychological capital in the curvilinear association between job autonomy and job performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34 (4), 603–625.
Sharma, P.N., & Kim, K.H. (2013). A comparison of PLS and ML bootstraping techniques in SEM: A Monte Carlo Study. In H. Abdi, W.W. Chin, V.E. Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New Perspectives in Partial Least Squares and related methods (pp. 201–208). Springer New York.
Shi, Y., Zheng, Y., Du, J., Zhu, Q., & Liu, X. (2020). The impact of engineering information complexity on working memory development of construction workers: an eye-tracking investigation. In Mounir El Asmar, Pingbo Tang, & David Grau (Eds.), Construction Research Congress 2020: Infrastructure Systems and Sustainability (pp. 89–98). American Society of Civil Engineers.
Sia, S.K., & Appu, A.V. (2015). Work autonomy and workplace creativity: Moderating role of task complexity. Global Business Review, 16 (5), 772–784.
Šmite, D., Gonzalez-Huerta, J., & Moe, N.B. (2020). “When in Rome, do as the Romans do”: Cultural barriers to being agile in distributed teams. 21st International Conference on Agile Software Development, 145–161.
Takaishi, K., Sekiguchi, K., Kono, H., & Suzuki, S. (2019). Interactive effects of work autonomy and proactive personality on innovative behavior. Asian Business Research, 4 (1), 6–16.
Tasavori, M., Eftekhar, N., Mohammadi Elyasi, G., & Zaefarian, R. (2021). Human resource capabilities in uncertain environments. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32 (17), 3721–3747.
Taylor, C.L., Esmaili Zaghi, A., Kaufman, J.C., Reis, S.M., & Renzulli, J.S. (2020). Divergent thinking and academic performance of students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder characteristics in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 109 (2), 213–229.
Thien, L.M., & Lee, H.C. (2023). The effects of school culture dimensions on teacher well-being across under-enrolled and high-enrolment schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7 (1), 100396
Torlak, N.G., Demir, A., & Budur, T. (2021). Decision-making, leadership and performance links in private education institutes. Rajagiri Management Journal, 16(1), 63–85.
Usman, M., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2017). How start-ups successfully organize and manage open innovation with large companies. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20 (1), 171–186.
Wijesinghe, P., Jayawardana, T., & Dasanayaka, S. (2020). Personality traits of techno-entrepreneurial engineers in Sri Lanka. 2020 Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon), 482–487.
Xie, Z., Wu, N., Yue, T., Jie, J., Hou, G., & Fu, A. (2020). How leader-member exchange affects creative performance: an examination from the perspective of self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–10.
Zhou, E. (2020). “Too-much-of-a-good-thing” effect of job autonomy and its explanation mechanism. Psychology, 11 (2), 299–313
Zhou, J., & George, J.M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), 682–696.
Zulfqar, A., Valcke, M., Hussain, B., & Devos, G. (2022). Analyzing the relationship between transformational leadership and participative decision making with related outcomes at Pakistani higher education. Journal of Education and Social Studies, 3 (3), 300–310.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.