Public debt management in Serbia during transition, great recession and Covid-19 pandemic
Abstract
This paper examines the nonlinear asymmetric behavior of the public debt/GDP ratio in Serbia in the first two decades of economic transition following the political and market reforms initiated at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Using quarterly data for the public debt/GDP ratio, a two-regime self-exciting threshold autoregressive threshold (SETAR) model of order one identifies a public debt/GDP ratio threshold of 66.2% above which fiscal policymakers in Serbia take corrective action in the form of increased fiscal prudence. The estimated public debt/GDP ratio threshold roughly corresponds to a 60% threshold from the Maastricht fiscal criteria and shows how fiscal policymakers in Serbia systematically ignore the 45% public debt/GDP limit set in the national fiscal rules. Such fiscal policy behavior could jeopardize the credibility of fiscal institutions in Serbia and have a negative impact on fiscal discipline and the likelihood of sovereign default
References
Aiyagari, R., Marcet, A., Sargent, T., & Seppälä, J. (2002). Optimal Taxation without State-Contingent Debt. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1220-1254.
Andric, V., Arsic, M., & Nojkovic, A. (2016). Public Debt Sustainability in Serbia Before and During the Global Financial Crisis. Economic Annals, 61(210), 47-78.
Andric, V., & Minovic, J. (2018). Public Debt Growth, Great Recession and Fiscal Consolidation-The Serbian Episode. Serbian Journal of Management, 13(2), 251-262.
Andric, V., & Minovic, J. (2022). The Sources of Serbian Budgetary Imbalances in a Time of Transition, Crisis and Global Pandemics. Pp. 107-125 In S. Redzepagic, A. P. Duarte, M. Siničáková, & D. Bodroza (Eds.), Economic and Financial Implications of COVID-19 Crises. Nice: Université Côte d’Azur.
Arsic, M., Nojkovic, A., & Randjelovic, S. (2017). Determinants of discretionary fiscal policy in Central and Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 41(3), 367-378.
Badia, M. M., Medas, P., Gupta, P., & Xiang, Y. (2022). Debt is not free. Journal of International Money and Finance, 127(C), 102654.
Barro, R. (1979). On the Determination of the Public Debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 940-971.
Bhandari, A., Evans, D., Golosov, M., & Sargent, T. (2017). Fiscal Policy and Debt Management with Incomplete Markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 617-663.
Blanchard, O. J. (1990). Comment on “Can Severe Fiscal Contractions be Expansionary?”. Pp. 111-117 In O. Blanchard, & S. Fisher (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chan, K. S., Petruccelli, J. D., Tong, H. & Woolford, S. W. (1985). A Multiple-Threshold AR(1) Model. Journal of Applied Probability, 22(2), 267-279.
Davoodi, H. R., Elger, P., Fotiou, A., Garcia-Macia, D., Han, X., Lagerborg, A., Lam, R. W., & Medas, P. (2022). Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Councils: Recent Trends and Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper 22/11.
Elliott, G., Rothenberg, T. J., & Stock, J. H. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836.
Ghosh, A. R., Kim, J. I., Mendoza, E. G., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2013). Fiscal Fatigue, Fiscal Space and Debt Sustainability in Advanced Economies. Economic Journal, 123(566), F4-F30.
González, M., & Gonzalo, J. (1997). Threshold Unit Root Models. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. DES Working Paper 97-50.
Hansen, B. (1997). Inference in TAR Models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2(1), 1-14.
Hansen, B. (1996). Inference When a Nuisance Parameter is not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis. Econometrica, 64(2), 413-430.
Hansen, B. (2017). Regression Kink with an Unknown Threshold. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 35(2), 228-240.
Jiang, Z., Lustig, H., Van Nieuwerburgh, S., & Xiaolan, M. Z. (2024). What Drives Variation in the U.S. Debt-to-Output Ratio? The Dogs that Did not Bark. Journal of Finance, 79(4), 2603-2665.
Koczan, Z. (2015). Fiscal Deficit and Public Debt in the Western Balkans: 15 Years of Economic Transition. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper 15/172.
Koczan, Z. (2017). Late to the game? Capital flows to the Western Balkans. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper 17/92.
Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P. & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178.
Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Serbia. (2024). Public Finance Bulletin. Available at https://www.mfin.gov.rs/en/activities/bulletin-public-finance-2.
Ng, S., & Perron, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power. Econometrica, 69(6), 1519-1554.
OECD. (2015). Achieving prudent debt targets using fiscal rules. OECD Economics Department Policy Notes No. 28.
Petruccelli, J. D. & Woolford, S. W. (1984). A Threshold AR(1) Model. Journal of Applied Probability, 21(2), 270-286.
Roubini, N., & Sachs, J. D. (1989). Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in industrial economies. European Journal of Political Economy, 33(5), 903-933.
Schwert, G. W. (1989). Tests for Unit Roots: A Monte Carlo Investigation. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 7(2), 5–17.
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. (2024). Quarterly Gross Domestic Product by Expenditure Approach (SNA 2008/ESA 2010). Available at Dissemination database search (stat.gov.rs).
Sutherland, A. (1997). Fiscal crises and aggregate demand: can high public debt reverse the effects of fiscal policy? Journal of Public Economics, 65(2), 147-162.
World Bank. (2021). Subdued Recovery. Western Balkans Regular Economic Report No. 19.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.