Steering through the landscape: a study on entrepreneurs' perceptions of business environments
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to analyze the perception of the environment by SME owners and managers. The research methodology used in this study involved collecting information from 384 SME owners-managers from different sectors of the economy in Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas, Ecuador. Proportional stratified sampling was used with 95% confidence and an error of 5%. The data was collected through a self-administered cross-sectional survey questionnaire that aimed to get SME owner-managers to describe how they perceive their environment making a combination of the value of each variable. The study applied categorical principal component analysis (CATPCA) to identify the component structure of social capital by considering the ordinal and nominal nature of the data. The methodology used allowed us to understand the perception of the environment by different SME owner-managers from different sectors of the economy. It also revealed the strategic approach they considered most appropriate to the market situation in which they operate. The practical implications of this research suggest that SME owner-managers can benefit from understanding the perception of the environment by adopting flexible and adaptable solutions to changing environmental conditions, using environmental profiles to uncover opportunities, and anticipating changes to gain valuable insights.
References
Abebe, M.A. (2012). Executive attention patterns, environmental dynamism and corporate turnaround performance. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 33 (7), 684-701.
Adeosun, O.T., & Owolabi, T. (2023). Owner-manager businesses and youth employee perceptions. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 3 (2), 97-117.
Ali, M., & Varoğlu, M.A. (2022). Revisiting the Mintzberg, Lawrence, and Lorsch theories about organisational structure, strategy, and environmental dynamism from the perspective of small firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 34 (1), 1-15.
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M.L. (2001). Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and Complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (3), 675-711.
Andrews, R. (2009). Organizational task environments and performance: An empirical analysis. International Public Management Journal, 12 (1), 1-23.
Bataglia, W., Aderito Silva, A., & Correa Porto, E. (2013). Organizational task environment: Evidence from the Brazilian industry. Management Research, 11 (3), 280-304.
Ben-Ner, A., Kong, F., & Lluis, S. (2012). Uncertainty, task environment, and organization design: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 82 (1), 281-313.
Bradley, S.W., Shepherd, D.A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The Importance of Slack for New Organizations Facing ‘Tough’ Environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (5), 1071-1097.
Cannon, A.R., & John, C.H.S. (2007). Measuring Environmental Complexity: A Theoretical and Empirical Assessment. Organizational Research Methods, 10 (2), 296-321.
Castrogiovanni, G.J. (1991). Environmental Munihcence; A Theoretical Assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16 (3), 542-565.
Castrogiovanni, G.J. (2002). Organization Task Environments: Have they Changed Fundamentally over Time? Journal of Management, 28 (2), 129-150.
Davis, J., Batchelor, J. H., & Kreiser, P. (2019). The influence of organizational task environment and firm size on top-executive compensation contracts. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 31(1), 21-42.
Davis, J.P., Eisenhardt, K.M., & Bingham, C.B. (2009). Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (3), 413-452.
Demirbas, D., Hussain, J. G., & Matlay, H. (2011). Owner‐managers' perceptions of barriers to innovation: empirical evidence from Turkish SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18 (4), 764-780.
Dess, G.G., & Beard, D.W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1), 52-73.
Dess, G.G., & Rasheed, A.M.A. (1991). Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational Environments: A Critique and Suggestions. Journal of Management, 17 (4), 701-710.
Dollinger, M.J. (1984). Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27 (2), 351-368.
Emery, F.E., & Trist, E.L. (1965). The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments. Human Relations, 18 (1), 21-32.
Ewusi-Mensah, K. (1981). The external organizational environment and its impact on management information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6 (4), 301-316.
Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-Business Owner-Managers' Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related Concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98 (3), 425-453.
Godoy-Bejarano, J.M., Ruiz-Pava, G.A., & Téllez-Falla, D.F. (2020). Environmental complexity, slack, and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 112, 105933.
Goyal, V., & Mishra, P. (2019). Evaluating channel partner’s performance: impact of task environments on the relevance of measurement metrics. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34 (2), 488-504.
Huang, Y.C., Jim Wu, Y.C., & Rahman, S. (2012). The task environment, resource commitment and reverse logistics performance: Evidence from the Taiwanese high-tech sector. Production Planning and Control, 23 (10-11), 851-863.
Josefy, M., Kuban, S., Ireland, R.D., & Hitt, M.A. (2015). All Things Great and Small: Organizational Size, Boundaries of the Firm, and a Changing Environment. Academy of Management Annals, 9 (1), 715-802.
Adaptive Performance: Research Insights and New Directions. Group and Organization Management, 48 (2), 405-435.
Jung, C., Foege, J.N., & Nüesch, S. (2020). Cash for contingencies: How the organizational task environment shapes the cash-performance relationship. Long Range Planning, 53 (3), 101885.
Keats, B.W., & Hitt, M.A. (1988). A Causal Model of Linkages Among Environmental Dimensions, Macro Organizational Characteristics, and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31 (3), 570-598.
Leaptrott, J., & Michael McDonald, J. (2015). Perceived environmental sector importance as a determinant of managerial information search behavior. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), 43-57.
Lengnick-Hall, C.A., & Beck, T.E. (2005). Adaptive Fit Versus Robust Transformation: How Organizations Respond to Environmental Change. Journal of Management, 31 (5), 738-757.
Lichtmannegger, C. (2019). Task Environment Matters for Intra-ministerial Change: The Interaction of International Environment, Organizational and Opportunity Factors. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (4), 320-333.
Miles, M.P., Covin, J.G., & Heeley, M.B. (2000). The Relationship between Environmental Dynamism and Small Firm Structure, Strategy, and Performance. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 8 (2), 63-78.
Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). Organization-Environment: Concepts and Issues. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 13 (3), 244-264.
Miller, D., & Friesen, P.H. (1983). Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management Journal, 4 (3), 221-235.
Payne, G.T., Kennedy, K.H., Blair, J.D., & Fottler, M.D. (2005). Strategic Cognitive Maps of Small Business Leaders. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 16 (1), 27–40.
Rasheed, A.M.A., & Prescot, J.E. (1992). Towards an Objective Classification Scheme for Organizational Task Environments. British Journal of Management, 3 (4), 197-206.
Rosenbusch, N., Rauch, A., & Bausch, A. (2013). The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Task Environment–Performance Relationship: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Management, 39 (3), 633-659.
Saukani, N., & Ismail, N.A. (2019). Identifying the Components of Social Capital by Categorical Principal Component Analysis (CATPCA). Social Indicators Research, 141 (2), 631-655.
Sharfman, M.P., & Dean, J.W. (1991). Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Management, 17 (4), 681-700.
Shortell, S.M. (1977). The Role of Environment in a Configurational Theory of Organizations. Human Relations, 30 (3), 275 - 302.
Sirmon, D.G., Hitt, M.A., & Ireland, R.D. (2007). Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box. Academy of Management Review, 32 (1), 273-292.
Skandera, D.J., McKenny, A.F., & Combs, J.G. (2023). The Influence of Task Environmental Uncertainty on the Balance Between Normative and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management, 49 (3), 1037-1069.
Stieglitz, N., Knudsen, T., & Becker, M.C. (2016). Adaptation and inertia in dynamic environments. Strategic Management Journal, 37 (9), 1854-1864.
Tanake, Y. (2005). Optimal Scaling. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, Vol. 3, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1479 – 1482.
Theodore, W., Kasali, R., Balqiah, T.E., & Sudhartio, L. (2022). The effects of task environment and organizational agility on perceived managerial discretion and strategy implementation in a pharmaceutical company. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 16 (2), 204-221.
Tung, R.L. (1979). Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory Study of Their Impact on Organization Structure. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (4), 672-693.
Uotila, J. (2018). Exploratory and Exploitative Adaptation in Turbulent and Complex Landscapes. European Management Review, 15 (4), 505-519.
Volberda, H.W., van der Weerdt, N., Verwaal, E., Stienstra, M., & Verdu, A.J. (2012). Contingency fit, institutional fit, and firm performance: A metafit approach to organization-environment relationships. Organization Science, 23 (4), 1040-1054.
Waithereroa, K. F., Wanyoike, M. S., & Muriu, M. S. (2019). Interaction between Financial Risk Management and Value of the Firm among Private Equity Firms in Frontier Markets: A Theoretical Perspective. J. Account. Fin. Audit. Stud., 5(3), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.32602/jafas.2019.29
Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1989). Effects of Environmental Scarcity and Munificence on the Relationship of Context to Organizational Structure. Academy of Management Journal, 32 (1), 131-156.
Yitzhack Halevi, M., Carmeli, A., & Brueller, N. N. (2015). Ambidexterity in SBUs: TMT Behavioral Integration and Environmental Dynamism. Human Resource Management, 54 (S1), 223-238.
Zahra, S. A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (4), 319-340.
Zhang, X., Majid, S., & Foo, S. (2013). Environmental Scanning Practices of Travel Agent Companies in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18 (8), 823-848.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.