Innovation - the role of trust
Sažetak
Innovations and constant change are inevitable parts of our everyday lives. It is not only because advanced technologies are more effective, but mostly because in the 21st century more and more realise that scarce resources – among them the safe and clean environment as such - necessitate a paradigm change and intense innovation. This revolution is easily trackable in the organisational and (supra)national policies. However, innovation, and its necessary prerequisites are seldom investigated from the individuals’ point of view.It is easy to understand that inter-organisational trust is inevitable on both the consumers’ and the providers’ (innovators’) side, however, it has to be made clear that an innovative organisation has to create a trusting environment within the company, in order to foster collaboration, the generation of new ideas, creativity and finally innovation.The present paper endeavours to call attention to the notion of trust and its antecedents and consequences in relation to innovations. The aim is to provide assistance in understanding how to develop trust in each other and hence foster further innovations and development.
Reference
Anderson, A.R., Jack, S.L., Dodd, S.D. (2005). The role of family members in entrepreneurial networks: Beyond the boundaries of the family firm. Family Business Review, 18 (2), 135- 154.
Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and Exchanges, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1 (4), 343-362.
Arrow, K. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York, USA: W.W. Norton & Company.
Bunduchi, R. (2013). Trust, partner selection and innovation outcome in collaborative new product development. Production Planning and Control, 24 (2-3), 145-157.
Burt, R. (2002). The Social Capital of Structural Holes. In Guillén M., Collins R., England P., & Meyer M. (Eds.), New Economic Sociology, The: Developments in an Emerging Field (pp. 148-190). Russell Sage Foundation.
Cheung, S.Y., Gong, Y., Wang, M., Shi, J. (2016). When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team. Human Relations, in press.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Coleman, T.F., & Hempel, C. (1990). Computing a trust region step for a penalty function. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 11 (1), 180-201.
Cook, K.S. Hardin, R., & Levi M. (2005). Cooperation without trust? Russell Sage Foundation.
Covey, S.M.R. (2006). The speed of trust: The one thing that changes everything. Simon and Schuster.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a Commodity. In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Blackwell 49-72.
Davis, J.P. (2016). The Group Dynamics of Interorganizational Relationships Collaborating with Multiple Partners in Innovation Ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, in press.
Edelman (2016). Edelman trust barometer: Global Report. on: http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2016-edelman-trust-barometer/global-results/
European Commission (2016). SBA Factsheet – Hungary 2015. Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16344
European Commission (2016). SBA Factsheet – Serbia 2015. Downloaded from: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/16344
Freel, M.S. (2003). Sectoral patterns of small firm innovation, networking and proximity. Research policy, 32 (5), 751-770.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York, USA: Free Press.
Gambetta, D. (2000). Can we trust trust. In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations, 13, 213-237.
Godart, O.N., Görg, H., Hanley, A. (2016). Trust-Based Work Time and Innovation Evidence from Firm-Level Data. Industrial and Labor Relations Review Journal, in press.
Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. The Journal of economic perspectives, 19 (1), 33-50.
Helliwell, J.F., & Wang, S. (2010). Trust and well-being. No. w15911. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Jimenez, N., San-Martin, S., Azuela, J.I. (2016). Trust and satisfaction: the keys to client loyalty in mobile commerce. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administraciá, 29 (4), 486-510.
Knack, S. (2003). Groups, growth and trust: Cross-country evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses. Public Choice, 117 (3-4), 341-355.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly journal of economics, 112 (4), 1251-1288.
Kohn, M. (2009). Trust: Self-interest and the common good. Oxford University Press.
Li, T., & Zhang, H. (2015). Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer. Omega, 50, 115–125.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power, Chichester, England:John Wiley & Sons.
Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives, in Trust, Gambetta, D. G.(ed.), pp. 94-107. New York, USA: Basil Blackwell.
Paldam, M., Svendsen, G.T. (2000). An essay on social capital: looking for the fire behind the smoke. European journal of political economy, 16 (2), 339-366.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2013). 16th CEO Survey, Downloaded from: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2013/.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2014). 17th CEO Survey, Downloaded from: http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/ceo-survey/2014/.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, USA: Simon and Schuster.
Serageldin, I., & Dasgupta, P. (2001). Social capital : a multifaceted perspective. World Bank, Washington DC, USA Downloaded from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/663341468174869302/Social-capital-a-multifaceted-perspective
Thome, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., Pires, S.R.I., Ceryno, P., Klingebiel, K. (2014). A multi-tier study on supply chain flexibility in the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 91–105.
Tóth, J. (2013). Trust – Networking – Innovation. 7th International Management Conference, New Management for the New Economy, Bucharest, Romania.
Watson Wyatt (2002). Human Capital Index®: Human Capital As a Lead Indicator of Shareholder Value. Downloaded from: https://www.oswego.edu/~friedman/human_cap_index.pdf
Williamson, O. (1993). Calcluativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law Economics, 34, 453-502.
World Values Survey (2016). World Values Survey Wave 5: 2005-2009. Online database analysed from: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
Zhou, G., Fei, Y., Hu, J. (2016). The Analysis of Vertical Transaction Behavior and Performance Based on Automobile Brand Trust in Supply Chain. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.