THE UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE ON ARWU LIST: Part I: THE IMPACT OF INDIVIDUAL FACULTIES ON THE ACHIEVED POSITION USING PROMETHEE-GAIA METHOD
Sažetak
Since 2012, University of Belgrade (UB) has been ranked among the 500 best universities in the world on the prestigious Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) list, also known as Shanghai list. These top 500 universities represent only 2% of all universities in the world. According to the most recent global ranking done in 2015, UB ranks between 201 and 300 place, and is the best ranked university in Southeast Europe.
UB consists of 31 faculties and 11 research institutes and each of these institutions in its own way contributes to the overall achieved position of UB on the ARWU list. This paper analyzes the impact of its certain faculties on the UB’s ranking position through a number of papers indexed in Science Citation Index - SCIe and SSCI, the number of citations and the number of citations per paper and per researcher for the period 2011 - 2015. For data processing multi-criteria decision making method PROMETHEE-GAIA, was used. Obtained results revealed four clusters of faculties such as faculties – with the greatest impact, with a significant impact, medium and low impact on the overall ranking result on ARWU list.
Reference
Altanopoulou, P., Dontsidou M., & Tselios, N. (2012). Evaluation of ninety-three major Greek university departments using Google Scholar. Quality in higher education, 18 (1), 111-137.
Arsić, M., Milijić, N., Živković, D., Nikolić, Đ., & Živković, Ž. (2012). The analysis of scientific - research work of group of technical faculties of Belgrade University in the post-accredation period. Serbian Journal of Management, 7 (1), 9-24.
Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200 (1), 198-215.
Brans, J.P., & Mareschal, B. (1994). The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid. Decision Support Systems, 12 (4-5), 297–310.
Brans, J.P., & Vincke, Ph. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31 (6), 647–656.
Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B., & Vincke, Ph. (1984). PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multi-criteria analysis. In J. P. Brans (Ed.), Operational research ’84 (pp. 477–490). North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1995). Teaching and research: establishing the vital link with learning. Higher Education, 29 (3), 261-273.
Chou, C.P., Lin, H., & Chiu, Y. (2013). The impact of SSCI and SCI Taiwan's academy: an outcry for fair play. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14 (1), 23-31.
Daraio, C., Bonaccorsi, A., & Simar, L. (2015). Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 224 (3), 918-930.
Docampo, D. (2013). Reproducibility of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics, 94 (2), 567-587.
Abramo, G., Cicero, T., & D'Angelo, C.A. (2013). The impact of unproductive and top researchers on overall university research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 7 (1), 166-175.
Ishizaka, A., & Nemery, P. (2011). Selecting the best statistical distribution with PROMETHEE and GAIA. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 61 (4), 958–969.
Lin, C.S., Hsuan, M.H., & Chen, D.Z. (2013). The influences of counting methods on university rankings based on paper count and citation count. Journal of Informetrics, 7 (3), 611-621.
Macharis, C., Springael, J., De Brucker, K., & Verbeke, A. (2004). PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 153 (2), 307–317.
Metcalf, M., Stocks, K., Summers, S.L., & Wood, D.A. (2015). Citation-based accounting education publication rankings. Journal of Accounting Education, 33 (4), 294-308.
Millot, B. (2015). International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 156-165.
Olcay, G.A., & Bulu, M. (2016). Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Article in press.
Price, J., & Cotten, S.R. (2006). Teaching, research, and service: Expectations of assistant professors. The American sociologist, 37 (1), 5-21.
Saarela, M., Karkkainen, T., Lahtonen, T., & Rossi, T. (2016). Expert-based versus citation based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels. Journal of Informetrics, 10 (3), 693-718.
Sidorenko, T., & Gorbatova, T. (2015). Efficiency of Russian education through the scale of World University Rankings. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 464-467.
Da Silva, R., Lamb, L.C., & Barbosa, M.C. (2016). University, correlations and rankings in the Brazilian universities national admission examinations. Physica A, 457, 295-306.
Vego G., Kučar-Dragičević, S., & Koprivanac, N. (2008). Application of multi-criteria decision-making on strategic municipal solid waste management in Dalmatia, Croatia. Waste Management, 28, 2192-2201.
Wijetunge, P. (2002). Adoption of knowledge management by the Sri Lankan University librarians in the light of the National Policy on University Education. International Journal of Educational Development , 22, 85-94.
Zornić, N., Marković, A., & Jeremić, V. (2014). How the top 500 ARWU can provide a misleading rank. Journal of Association for Information Science and Technology, 65 (6), 1303-1304.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.