Евалуација и рангирање осигуравајућих друштава комбиновањем “TOPSIS” и интервалних фази грубих скупова
Sažetak
Процена корпоративног и организационог учинка је важна активност како за менаџере, тако и за друге заинтересоване стране, јер им даје предност да процене сопствене снаге и слабости у односу на конкуренцију, као и смернице за одабир одговарајућих мера за решавање постојећих проблема. Питање избора критеријума превазиђено је прегледом литературе, а питање тежине критеријума решава се применом групног поступка одлучивања. Сама процедура се састоји од коришћења унапред дефинисаних лингвистичких израза који су моделовани триангуларним фази бројевима и агрегације мишљења доносилаца одлука на основу правила грубе алгебре скупова. Вредности матрице одлуке су одређене методом прогнозе и описане су прецизним вредностима. Предложени алгоритам је тестиран на осигуравајућим друштвима која послују у Републици Србији.
Reference
Akhisar, I., & Tunay, N. (2015, May). Performance Ranking of Turkish Life Insurance Companies Using AHP and TOPSIS. In Management International Conference, Portoroz, Slovenia, 241-250.
Aruldoss, M., Lakshmi, T.M., & Venkatesan, V.P. (2013). A survey on multi criteria decision making methods and its applications. American Journal of Information Systems, 1 (1), 31-43.
Bello, R., Falcón, R., & Verdegay, J. L. (Eds.). (2019). Uncertainty Management with Fuzzy and Rough Sets: Recent Advances and Applications: Springer, New York, NY, USA.
Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy sets and systems, 17 (3), 233-247.
Chen, S. Y., & Lu, C. C. (2015). Assessing the competitiveness of insurance corporations using fuzzy correlation analysis and improved fuzzy modified TOPSIS. Expert Systems, 32 (3), 392-404.
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1980). Theory and applications, fuzzy sets and systems. New York, USA: Academic.
Ercan, M., & Onder, E. (2016). Ranking Insurance Companies in Turkey Based on Their Financial Performance Indicators Using VIKOR Method. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 6 (2), 104-113.
Ertugrul, I., & Özçil, A. (2016). The Performance Analysis of Fuzzy Topsis and Fuzzy Dematel Methods into Insurance Companies. Cankırı Karatekin University journal of the Faculty of Economics et Administrative Sciences, 6 (1), 175 – 200. (In Turkish)
Ghadikolaei, A.S., & Esbouei, S.K. (2014). Integrating Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS for evaluating financial performance. Boletim da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática, 32 (2), 163-174.
Grigaliunas, L., & Li, J. (2017, July). Dagong Europe Criteria for Rating Insurance Companies, Dagong Europe - www.dagongeurope.com
Hu, Q., Yu, D., & Xie, Z. (2006). Information-preserving hybrid data reduction based on fuzzy-rough techniques. Pattern recognition letters, 27 (5), 414-423.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making, Berlin, Heidelberg, DE: Springer.
International Association of Insurance Supervisors, IAIS, Application paper on information gathering and analysis, 2010.
Khan, C., Anwar, S., Bashir, S., Rauf, A., & Amin, A. (2015). Site selection for food distribution using rough set approach and TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29 (6), 2413-2419.
Kwon, W.J., & Wolfrom, L. (2017). Analytical tools for the insurance market and macro-prudential surveillance. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 2016 (1), 1-47.
Lu, M., & Zhu, K. (2018). Performance evaluation of the insurance companies based on AHP. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1955, No. 1, p. 040002). AIP Publishing.
Mandić, K., Delibašić, B., Knežević, S., & Benković, S. (2017). Analysis of the efficiency of insurance companies in Serbia using the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 30 (1), 550-565.
Nestic, S., Lampón, J.F., Aleksic, A., Cabanelas, P., & Tadic, D. (2019). Ranking manufacturing processes from the quality management perspective in the automotive industry. Expert Systems, e12451.
Nissim, D. (2010). Analysis and valuation of insurance companies. CE| ASA (Center for Excellence in Accounting and Security Analysis) Industry Study, (2).
Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the Best–Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert systems with applications, 91, 89-106.
Pardalos, P.M., Michalopoulos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (1997). On the use of multicriteria methods for the evaluation of insurance companies in Greece. In New operational approaches for financial modelling (pp. 271-283). Physica, Heidelberg
Pawlak, Z. (2012). Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.
Rejda, G. E. (2011). Principles of risk management and insurance. Pearson Education India, Noida, India.
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, US: McGraw-Hill.
Saeedpoor, M., Vafadarnikjoo, A., Mobin, M., & Rastegari, A. (2015, October). A servqual model approach integrated with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy topsis methodologies to rank life insurance firms. In Proceedings of the international annual conference of the American society for engineering management (p. 1).
Sharma, H. K., Roy, J., Kar, S., & Prentkovskis, O. (2018). Multi criteria evaluation framework for prioritizing Indian railway stations using modified rough AHP-MABAC method. Transport and telecommunication journal, 19 (2), 113-127.
Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Z., & Zhu, B. (2014). A rough TOPSIS approach for failure mode and effects analysis in uncertain environments. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 30 (4), 473-486.
Steuer, R.E., & Na, P. (2003). Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study. European Journal of operational research, 150 (3), 496-515.
Toloie-Eshlaghy, A., & Homayonfar, M. (2011). MCDM methodologies and applications: a literature review from 1999 to 2009. Research Journal of International Studies, 21, 86-137.
Tsai, H.Y., Huang, B.H., & Wang, A.S. (2008). Combining ANP and TOPSIS concepts for evaluation the performance of property-liability insurance companies. Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 56–61.
Valahzaghard, M., & Ferdousnejhad, M. (2013). Ranking insurance firms using AHP and Factor Analysis. Management Science Letters, 3 (3), 937-942.
Wang, J.J., Jing, Y.Y., Zhang, C.F., & Zhao, J.H. (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13 (9), 2263-2278.
Yang, Q., Du, P.A., Wang, Y., & Liang, B. (2017). A rough set approach for determining weights of decision makers in group decision making. PloS one, 12 (2), e0172679.
Zavadskas, E.K., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and economic development of economy, 17 (2), 397-427.
Zimmermann, H.J. (2011). Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Zopounidis, C. (1999). Multicriteria decision aid in financial management. European Journal of Operational Research, 119 (2), 404-415.
Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi‐criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 11 (4‐5), 167-186.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.