Баријере увођења нове технологије и недостаци индустрије 4.0 за индустријска предузећа
Sažetak
Успон нових технологија познатих као четврта индустријска револуција (Индустрија 4.0), доноси трансформацију која омогућава производњу и израду производа на машинама путем робота у модерним паметним фабрикама. Индустрија 4.0 ће повећати продуктивност, квалитет робе, подстаћи индустријски раст и модификовати профил радне снаге и потребне компетенције. Међутим, такве користи и предности треба проценити у светлу потенцијалних препрека и негативних последица.
Рад се бави препрекама увођења нове технологије и главним недостацима индустрије 4.0. На основу анкетног истраживања у 217 индустријских предузећа, анализиране су разлике између предузећа према величини и технолошком интензитету. Главне препреке увођењу технологије и недостаци индустрије 4.0 су недостатак средстава, високи трошкови, оптимизација производног процеса и велика потреба за инвестицијама. Истраживање је потврдило само мале разлике у преференцијама менаџера у погледу технолошких баријера индустрије 4.0 и недостатака индустрије 4.0 према величини предузећа. Технолошки интензитет је био важан само делимично у случају сагледавања недостатака индустрије 4.0. Кључни доприноси овог рада су обећавајући резултати за боље разумевање технолошких баријера и недостатака индустрије 4.0.
Reference
Basl, J. (2017). Pilot Study of Readiness of Czech Companies to Implement the Principles of Industry 4.0. Management and Production Engineering Review, 8 (2), 3–8.
Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017 (11), 2195–2202.
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36 (12), 66–77.
Czech Statistical Office. (2020). High-Tech Sector. Retrieved July 20, 2020 from https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/high_tech_sektor.
Erol, S., Jäger, A., Hold, P., Ott, K., & Sihn, W. (2016). Tangible Industry 4.0: A Scenario-Based Approach to Learning for the Future of Production. Procedia CIRP, 54, 13–18.
Glass, R., Meissner, A., Gebauer, C., Sturmer, S., & Metternich, J. (2018). Identifying the barriers to Industrie 4.0 (pp. 985–988). In L. Wang (Ed.), 51st Cirp Conference on Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 72. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv.
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R.Z. (2019). Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4.0: Do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 119–132.
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Munich, Germany: National Academy of Science and Engineering.
Kovacs, O. (2018). The dark corners of industry 4.0 – Grounding economic governance 2.0. Technology in Society, 55, 140–145.
Lee, I., & Lee, K. (2015). The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons, 58 (4), 431–440.
Li, S., Tryfonas, T., & Li, H. (2016). The Internet of Things: a security point of view. Internet Research, 26 (2), 337–359.
Meyer, U. (2019). The emergence of an envisioned future. Sensemaking in the case of "Industrie 4.0" in Germany. Futures, 109, 130–141.
Muhuri, P.K., Shukla, A.K., & Abraham, A. (2019). Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 78, 218–235.
Newcombe R.G. (1998). Interval Estimation for the Difference Between Independent Proportions: Comparison of Eleven Methods. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873–890.
Obiso, J.J.A., Himang, C.M., Ocampo, L.A., Bongo, M.F., Caballes, S.A.A., & Abellana, D.P.M. (2019). Management of Industry 4.0-reviewing intrinsic and extrinsic adoption drivers and barriers. International Journal of Technology Management, 81 (3-4), 210–257.
Oesterreich, T.D., & Teuteberg, F. (2016). Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: A triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Computers in Industry, 83, 121–139.
Ottonicar, S.L.C., da Nascimento, N.M., de Biaggi, C., & Mosconi, E.P. (2020). Information literacy: a factor to overcome the barriers of innovation in the context of industry 4.0. Revista Ibero-Americana De Ciencia Da Informacao, 13 (1), 86–106.
Pech, M., & Vrchota, J. (2020). Classification of small-and medium-sized enterprises based on the level of industry 4.0 implementation. Applied Sciences-Basel, 10 (15), 5150, 1–22.
Peillon, S., & Dubruc, N. (2019). Barriers to digital servitization in French manufacturing SMEs. Procedia CIRP, 83, 146–150.
Rauch, E., Linder, C., & Dallasega, P. (2020). Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industry 4.0. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 105644, 1–15.
Schneider, P. (2018). Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field. Review of Managerial Science, 12 (3), 803–848.
Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. UK: Portfolio.
Ślusarczyk, B. (2018). Industry 4.0 - are we ready? Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17 (1), 232–248.
Soukupová, N., Adamová, M., & Krninská, R. (2020). Industry 4.0: An Employee Perception (Case of the Czech Republic). Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68 (3), 637–644.
Turkes, M.C., Oncioiu, I., Aslam, H.D., Marin-Pantelescu, A., Topor, D.I., & Capusneanu, S. (2019). Drivers and Barriers in Using Industry 4.0: A Perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes, 7 (3), 153, 1–20.
von Leipzig, T., Gamp, M., Manz, D., Schöttle, K., Ohlhausen, P., Oosthuizen, G., & von Leipzig, K. (2017). Initialising Customer-orientated Digital Transformation in Enterprises. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 517–524.
Vrchota, J., & Pech, M. (2019). Readiness of Enterprises in Czech Republic to Implement Industry 4.0: Index of Industry 4.0. Applied Sciences-Basel, 9 (24), 5405, 1–25.
Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., & Zhang, C. (2016). Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Computer Networks, 101, 158–168.
Weber, R.H., & Studer, E. (2016). Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things: Legal aspects. Computer Law & Security Review, 32 (5), 715–728.
Zhang, Y., Qiu, M., Tsai, C.W., Hassan, M.M., & Alamri, A. (2017). Health-CPS: Healthcare cyber-physical system assisted by cloud and big data. IEEE Systems Journal, 11 (1), 88–95.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.