Индустрија 4.0 и мали бизнис
Нешто изван технологије – преглед литературе
Sažetak
Мала и средња предузећа (МСП) су посебно осетљива на питања технологије, често зато што им недостају финансијска средства или вештине да правилно искористе нове технологије. Овај рад представља резултате студије која истражује везу између Индустрије 4.0 и МСП кроз систематски преглед литературе. Резултати показују да овом везом доминирају теме које се могу груписати у следеће категорије: „Индустријске револуције“, „Технологија“, „Менаџмент“, „Управљање операцијама/Индустријски инжењеринг“, „Друштвена питања/ Одрживост“ и „Методологија ”. Студија показује релевантност тема менаџмента, друштвених питања и одрживости, што се онда не огледа у објављивању чланака о индустрији 4.0 у часописима из ових области. На крају, успостављање партнерства између истраживачких тимова у овим истраживачким областима и тимова који проучавају индустрију 4.0 могло би ублажити овај недостатак. Теме друштвена питања и одрживости су недовољно заступљене и стога је потребан напор да се развију истраживања о утицају ових тема на индустрију 4.0 и обрнуто.
Reference
Agostino, I.R.S., da Silva, W.V., Pereira da Veiga, C., & Souza, A.M. (2020). Forecasting models in the manufacturing processes and operations management: Systematic literature review. Journal of Forecasting, 39 (7), 1043-1056.
Aronica, M., Fazio, G., & Piacentino, D. (2021). SMEs' heterogeneity at the extensive margin and within the intensive margin of trade. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 30 (3), 439-467.
Battesini, M., ten Caten, C.S., & Pacheco, D.A.D.J. (2021). Key factors for operational performance in manufacturing systems: Conceptual model, systematic literature review and implications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 265-282.
Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Mutz, R. (2021). Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 224.
Bouzakis, A. (2021). Scaling challenges of high-tech SMEs developing internet of things technology. International Conference on Engineering Management of Communication and Technology (EMCTECH), 1-5.
Chavez, Z., Hauge, J. B., & Bellgran, M. (2022). Industry 4.0, transition or addition in SMEs? A systematic literature review on digitalization for deviation management. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 119 (1-2), 57-76.
CR (Commission Recommendation) (1996). Commission Recommendation concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Official Journal of the European Union, L 107/4- L 107/7, 30.4.1996. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:1996:107:FULL&from=EN.
CR (Commission Recommendation) (2003). Commission Recommendation concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Official Journal of the European Union, L 124/36-L 124/38, 20.5.2003. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2003:124:FULL&from=EN.
Cuerva, M.C., Triguero-Cano, Á., & Córcoles, D. (2014). Drivers of green and non-green innovation: Empirical evidence in low-tech SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 68, 104-113.
Dallasega, P., Rauch, E., & Linder, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 as an enabler of proximity for construction supply chains: a systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 99, 205–225.
Dias Lopes, J., & Losada, A. (2022). A relação política-administração. Que se conclui da revisão sistemática da literatura mais recente?. RIPS: Revista de Investigaciones Políticas y Sociológicas, in press.
European Commission (Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs) (2020). Guia do utilizador relativo à definição de PME [User guide to the SME Definition]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/80894
European Commission (Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, Van de Velde, E., Núñez, L.,) (2021). Advanced technologies for industry: recommendations for action to improve SMEs' access across Europe to advanced technology centres. Brussels: Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2826/602934
Grau, A., Indri, M., Lo Bello, L., & Sauter, T. (2021). Robots in industry: The past, present, and future of a growing collaboration with humans. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 15 (1), 50-61.
Hood, W.W., & Wilson, C.S. (2001). The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics 52 (2), 291-314.
Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Report from Industrie 4.0 Working Group of Acatech. Berlin, Forschungsunion, acatech. Retrieved from https://en.acatech.de/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2018/03/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf
Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S.A. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: a systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 117, 408–425.
Karoui, L., Khlif, W., & Ingley, C. (2017). SME heterogeneity and board configurations: An empirical typology. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24 (3), 545-561.
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90-91, 100315.
Klingenberg, C.O., Borges, M.A.V., & Antunes, Jr., J.A.V. (2019). Industry 4.0 as a Data-Driven Paradigm: A Systematic Literature Review on Technologies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32 (3), 570-592.
Larsen, P.O., & von Ins, M. (2010). The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84 (3), 575-603.
Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E.D.F.R., & Ramos, L.F.P. (2017). Past, present and future of Industry 4.0-a systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55 (12), 3609–3629.
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P.J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6 (7), 1000100.
Lightfoot, H., Baines, T., & Smart, P. (2013). The servitization of manufacturing: A systematic literature review of interdependent trends. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 33 (11), 1408-1434.
Mangematin, V., Lemarié, S., Boissin, J. -., Catherine, D., Corolleur, F., Coronini, R., & Trommetter, M. (2003). Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: The case of biotechnology in france. Research Policy, 32 (4), 621-638.
Martins, F.C., Simon, A.T., & Campos, R. S. (2020). Supply Chain 4.0 challenges. Gestão & Produção, 27 (3), e5427.
Mejia C, Wu M, Zhang Y, Kajikawa Y. (2021). Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 742311.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6 (7), 1000097.
Nguyen, T., Duong, Q. H., Nguyen, T. V., Zhu, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022). Knowledge mapping of digital twin and physical internet in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Economics, 244, 108381.
Oduro, S. (2019). Examining open innovation practices in low-tech SMEs: Insights from an emerging market. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 10 (3), 509-532.
Page, M,J., Mckenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18, 1003583.
Paschou, T., Adrodegari, F., Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., & Perona, M. (2018). Towards service 4.0: A new framework and research priorities. Procedia CIRP, 73, 148-154.
Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 10 (10), 3821.
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020). Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Journal of Production Research, 58, 1662-1687.
Rose, D.C., & Chilvers, J. (2018). Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2, 87.
Sader, S., Husti, I., & Daroczi, M. (2021). A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, in press.
SBA (2009). SBA size standards methodology. Retrieved from https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2018-02/size_standards_methodology.pdf.
Sedoglavich, V. (2012). Technological imperatives in the internationalization process: Results from a qualitative investigation of high-tech SMEs. Management Research Review, 35 (5), 441-459.
Selicati, V, & Cardinale, N. (2021). The Benefits in Coupling Exergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment in the Context of Sustainable Manufacturing for Industry 4.0: A Real Industrial Case. International Journal of Heat and Technology, 39 (1), 12-22.
Thomé, A.M.T., Scavarda, L.F., & Scavarda, A.J. (2016). Conducting systematic literature review in operations management. Production Planning and Control, 27 (5), 408-420.
Trček, D. (2022). E-government 4.0: Managing APIs as facilitators for digital transformation. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11 (1), 1-14.
Valle-Cruz, D., & Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2014). E-gov 4.0: A literature review towards the new government. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. Aguascalientes, Mexico, 333-334.
Vrchota, J., & Řehoř, P. (2021). Project management in manufacturing enterprises. Serbian Journal of Management, 16 (2), 341-353.
Williams, R.I., Clark, L.A., Clark, W.R., & Raffo D.M. (2021). Re-examining systematic literature review in management research: Additional benefits and execution protocols. European Management Journal, 39 (4), 521-533.
Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2015). New economics of innovation: Strategies to support high-tech SMEs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 26 (2), 186-195.
Zhou, L., Jiang, Z., Geng, N., Niu, Y., Cui, F., Liu, K., & Qi, N. (2021). Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 60 (2), 808-846.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.