Ланчестерове једначине као једноставно стратегијско помагало
Sažetak
У овом раду је истражена метода Лачестерових једначина као једноставног симулационог моделовања борбе хетерогених снага у операцијама разматрајући методе оптималног оперативног концепта као секундарног аналитичког алата. Према овој хипотези креирано је шест начина употребе хетерогених борбених снага. Математички модел развијен помоћу Лачестерових једначина, квадратног и линеарног закона, за употребу у борби два противника са хетерогеном структуром снага (ваздухопловство и војска). Креирани поједностављени модел је од помоћи и омогућава исправну анализу у процесу доношења одлука. То потвршује практичну употребу ове методе као секундарног аналитичког алата. Прави рат и борбене операције су веома сложене и из тог разлога доносиоцима одлука је потребна примена неких апроксимираних метода у симулацији и моделирању попут Лачестерових једначина.
Reference
Air Force Doctrine Document 2 (2007), Operations and Organizations.
https://irp.fas.org/doddir/usaf/afdd2.pdf, [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Air Force Doctrine Document 1 (2003), Air Force Basic Doctrine, https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/END-Archive/USAF-afdd1(2003).pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Air Force Doctrine Document 2–1 (2000), Air Warfare, https://www.bits.de/NRANEU/others/END-Archive/USAF-afdd2_1%282000%29.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Air Force Doctrine Document 3–01 (2008), Counterair Operations, 22-27, https://irp.fas.org/doddir/usaf/afdd3-01.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Air Force Doctrine Document 3-70 (2021), Strategic Attack, https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-70/3-70-AFDP-STRATEGIC-ATTACK.pdf [Accessed: 09 June 2023]
Berkovitz L.D. & Dresher M. (1959), A Game-Theory Analysis of Tactical Air War, Operations Research, 7, (5), 2-33.
Caldwell B., Hartman J., Parry S., Washburn A., & Youngren M. (2000), Aggregated Combat Models, Operations Research Department Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, Monterey California, 5-11.
https://faculty.nps.edu/awashburn/Washburnpu/AGGREGATED2022.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Coulson S.G., Lanchester modeling of intelligence in combat (2019), IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 30 (2), 149–164.
Deitchman S.J., (1962), A Lanchester Model of Guerilla Warfare, Operations. Research 10 (6), 818-827.
Doctrine FM-3-0 (2022), Operations, Department of the army, https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6687_FM%203-0%20C1%20Inc%20FINAL%20WEB.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Doctrine of Serbian Armed Force (2010), Belgrade, https://www.scribd.com/doc/270209153/Doktrina-Vojske-Srbije-kraj (in Serbian). [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Doctrine for Planning of Serbian Armed Force J-5.0 (2012), Department for Planning and Development GS SAF, Media Center „Odbrana“, Belgrade, 34 - 41, (in Serbian).
Engel J.H. (1954), Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2 (2), 163-171.
Engineering Design Handbook part two (1979), Army Weapon Systems Analysis, United States. Army Materiel Development and Readiness Command, 28-27 and 28-35, https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a086388.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Fricker R.D. (1997), Attrition models of the Ardennes campaign, RAND, Santa Monica CA. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199802)45:1<1::AID-NAV1>3.0.CO;2-D
Gulf War Air Power Survey Volume I, Planning and Command and Control, (1993),, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.,122, 83-191, https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329802/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-062.pdf. [Accessed: 09 June 2023].
Gulf War, Air Power Survey Volume II, Operations and Effects and Effectiveness, (1993), Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.,120-130.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA279742.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Ho Hsiao and Sy-Ming Guu (2004), A Differential Game for Air-Land Combat Operations, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Differential-Game-for-AirLand-Combat-Operations-Hsiao-Guu/6d7fb13da1da57a9b5d3803c08941ccdb929b61b [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Isaacs R. (1965), Differential Games, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Taylor J.G. (1980), Lanchester-type Models of Warfare, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey California, Vol. I, 52 to 182.
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA090842.pdf
James G. Taylor (1982), Annhilation Prediction for Lanchester-type Models of Modern Warfare with Logistics Constraints, Malhemalical Modelling, Vol. 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(82)90049-5.
Taylor J.G. (1983), Lanchester Models of Warfare Vol I-II, Operations Research Society of America Arlington, VA, 441 - 458.
Joint Operating Concept (2006), Major Combat Operations, Version 2.0, 10-56.
https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_combatops.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162012-383 [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Joint Operations (2017), Joint Publication 3-0, https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/jp3_0.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Kress M. (2020), Lanchester Models for Irregular Warfare, Operations Research Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 79-111.
Keaney A.T. & Cohen E.A. (1993) Gulf War Air Power Surwey, Summary Report, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402-9328. https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001329801/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-061.pdf [Accessed: 09 June 2023]
Lanchester Frederick (1916), Aircraft in Warfare: the Dawn of the Fourth Arm, Constable and Co. Ltd. , 5/39 - 5/66.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Aircraft_in_Warfare.pdf
Thomas L.W. (2004), Fitting Lanchester Equations to the Battles of Kursk and Ardennes, Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive.
https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/44169/Lucas_Fitting.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, DOI 10.1002/nav.10101
MacKay N. (2002), Lanchester combat models, Department of Mathematics, University of York, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0606300
The Operational Planning Process Handbook (2018), Canadian Army Command and Staff College, CACSC-PUB-500. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/dndmdn/army/lineofsight/files/articlefiles/en/CACSC-PUB-500-2018.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023]
Osipov M., (1915), The Influence of the Numeric Strength of Engaged Forces on Their Casualties, Originally Published in the Tzarist Russian Journal, Translation of September 1991 by Dr. Robert L. Heimbold and Dr. Allan S. Rehm, US Army Concepts Analysis Agency (January 1, 1991), https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA241534
Patrick D. A. (1998), Air Combat Model Engagement and Attrition Processes High Level Design, Published by RAND, Santa Monica CA 90407-2138, 8-12, 12-22 and 36-46.
Protopopescu V., Santoro R.T., Cox R.L. and Rusu P. (1990), Combat Modeling with Partial Differential Equations - The Bidimensional Case, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oat Ridge, Tennessee 37831, https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5233113 [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
Petric J.J. (1974), Operational Research in Armed Force, Armed Force Public Institute, Belgrade, 34-47. (in Serbian).
Saunders R. and Souva M. (2020), Air superiority and battlefield victory, Research & Politics, https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680209728
Seung-Won B. (2013). Raid-Type War-Game Model Based on a Discrete Multi-Weapon Lanchester’s Law, Management Science and Financial Engineering, 19 (2), 31-36.
Timothy C. Barkdoll, Donald P. Gaver, Kevin D. Glazebrook, Patricia A. Jacobs, Sergio Posadas (2002), Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) as an Information Duel, Dudley Knox Library, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey California, 723-742. https://calhoun.nps.edu/bitstream/handle/10945/38204/Suppression.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y, DOI:10.1002/nav.10046
Vego M. (2007), JOINT OPERATIONAL WARFARE Vol. 1, Naval War College, II-63 to III-3, V-3 to V-97.
Vlatkovic Milan (1988), Air Operations, Air Force High Educational Center, Belgrade, 13-15.(in Serbian).
Washburn A. (2000), Lanchester’s Systems, https://faculty.nps.edu/awashburn/Files/Notes/Lanchester.pdf [Accessed: 08 June 2023].
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.