Сценарији за запошљавање особа са инвалидитетом у социјалним предузећима за радну интеграцију у Летонији
Sažetak
Запошљавање је важан део живота одраслих, али је приступ тржишту рада за особе са инвалидитетом ограничен. Решење је да се промовише развој социјалних предузећа за интеграцију у рад (СПИР), али за то је потребна већа подршка. Стога, истраживање има за циљ да идентификује факторе који утичу на запошљавање особа са инвалидитетом од стране СПИР-а и осмисли сценарије за промовисање запошљавања особа са инвалидитетом у Летонији у контексту социјалног предузетништва.
Истраживање је извршило систематски теоријски преглед да би се идентификовали фактори, њихов обим и карактеристике, као и њихов значај и примењена анализа, синтеза и дедукција за идентификацију и класификацију фактора. Метод сценарија је коришћен да се идентификују могућности запошљавања особа са инвалидитетом, али је процена сценарија извршена применом процеса аналитичке хијерархије (АХП), у који су укључени стручњаци који се баве социјалним предузетништвом.
Истраживање је показало да је најефикаснији начин да се промовише запошљавање особа са инвалидитетом од стране СПИР-а повећање обима националних инструмената подршке и да је од суштинског значаја употреба општинских инструмената подршке. Национални сценарио подршке укључивао је делимично субвенционисање плата за запослене са инвалидитетом запослене у СПИР-има и подршку за дугорочна улагања у СПИР-ове.
Reference
Amin, A. (2009). The Social Economy. International Perspectives on Economic Solidarity. London: Zed Books.
Anca, E., & Sloka, B. (2020). Social entrepreneurship and employment challenges of persons with mental disabilities. New Challenges in Economic and Business Development – 2020: Economic Inequality and Well-Being. University of Latvia, Faculty of Business, Management and Economics, Riga, 9-16.
Barraket, J. (2013). Fostering the wellbeing of immigrants and refugees? Evaluating the outcomes of work integration social enterprise. Pp. 102-119 in S. Denny & and F. Seddon (Eds.), Social Enterprise Accountability and Evaluation Around the World, Routledge, Abington: Oxon.
Barraket, J., & Archer, V. (2010). Social inclusion through community enterprise? Examining the available evidence. Third Sector Review, 16, 13-28.
Berkes, F., & Ross, H. (2013). Community resilience: toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 5-20.
Boardman, J. (2018). Work, employment and psychiatric disability. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 9 (5), 327-334.
Bode, I., Evers, A., & Schulz, A. (2004). Facing new challenges. Work integration social enterprises in Germany. ISTR Workers paper series Toronto, Universitat Essen-Duisburg, Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Germany, 18.
Brown, J. (2002). Social enterprise – so what’s new? Regeneration and Renewal, August 23, 16-17.
Chiu, C., Chan, C., & Chandra, Y. (2023). The role of social enterprises in facilitating labour market integration for people with disabilities: A convenient deflection from policy mainstreaming? Journal of Social Policy, 52(1), 176-196. doi:10.1017/S0047279421000490.
Chiu, C.H-K., Shum, M.H.Y., & Lum, T.Y.S. (2018). Work integration social enterprises as vessels of empowerment? Perspectives from employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 29 (2), 133-148.
Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 411-424.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1 (1), 32-53.
Dobele, L. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship Development Possibilities in Latvia. Latvia: University of Agriculture.
Dobele, L. (2011). Influencing factors of social entrepreneurship in Latvia. Research for Rural Development, 2, 101-107.
Elmes, A.I. (2019). Health impacts of a WISE: a longitudinal study. Social Enterprise Journal, 15, 457-474.
Escribano, F.P., & Gonzalez, F.J.M. (2022). Creation of work integration social enterprises (WISEs) by social action organizations: Proposal of a model for decision-making. Voluntas.
European Commission (2018). Up-date of the mapping of social enterprises and their eco-systems in Europe. Country report Latvia. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Eversole, R., Barraket, J., & Luke, B. (2013). Social enterprises in rural community development. Community Development Journal, 49, 245-261.
Farmer, J., Kamstra, P., Brennan-Horley, C., De Cotta, T., Roy, M., Barraket, J., Munoz, S.-A., & Kilpatrick, S. (2020). Using micro-geography to understand the realisation of wellbeing: A qualitative GIS study of three social enterprises. Health and Place, 62, 1-11.
Gay, H.M.A. (2004). Social integration and employees with disability: their view. Disability Studies Quarterly, 24 (1). Retrieved from: https://dsq-sds.org/article/view/860
Ginis, K., A., Jetha, A., & Gignac, M., A., M. (2023). Experiental aspects of employment and their relationship with work outcomes: A cross-sectional study using a novel measures of participation in workers with and without physical disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 11, February.
Gintere, D., & Licite-Kurbe, L. (2021). Social enterprise profile in the Latvia regions. Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 11 – 14 May, 296-303.
Heo, J-E., & Xiaohui, L. (2019). A Study on the factors influencing graduates’ employment. Asian-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange, 5 (3), 81-89.
Ho, A.P., & Chan, K. (2010). The social impact of work-integration social enterprise in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 53 (1), 33-45.
Keating, B., W., Keramat, S., A., Waller, I., & Hashmi, R. (2022). Job satisfaction dynamics: how do they impact employment mode choice for people with a disability? Heliyon, 8 (10), e11076.
Knardahl, S., Johannessen, A.A., Sterud, T., Harma, M., Rugulies, R., Seitsamo, J., & Borg, V. (2017). The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses. BMC Public Health, 17 (176).
Kosow, H., & Gassner, R. (2008). Methods of future and scenario analysis. Overview, assessment and selection criteria. German Development Institute. 83
Leslie, D., Rantisi, N., & Black, S. (2023). Realizing the social mandate of work-integration social enterprises through an anti-racist feminist praxis and spatiality? Geoforum, 138, January.
Mason, C., Barraket, J., Friel, S., O’Rourke, K., & Stenta, C.-P. (2015). Social innovation for the promotion of health equity. Health Promotion International, 30, ii116-ii125.
Martin, R.L., & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: the case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 27-39.
May, D.R., Gilson, L., & Harter, L.M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 11-37.
Morina, A., & Biagiotti, G. (2022). Inclusion at university, transition to employment and employability of graduates with disabilities: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Development, 93.
Munoz, S.-A., Farmer, J., Winterton, R., & Barraket, J. (2015). The social enterprise as a space of well-being: an exploratory case study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11, 281-302.
Musinguzi, P., Baker, D., & Villano, R., A. (2023). Interrelationships amongst critical success factors and rural social enterprises’ performance in a developing country context. Journal of Rural Studies, 100, 102995.
Ne’eman, A., & Maestas, N. (2023). How has Covid-19 impacted disability employment? Disability and Health Journal, 16, 101429.
Olmedo, L., van Twuijver, M., & O’Shaughnessy, M. (2021). Rural as context for innovative responses to social challenges – the role of rural social enterprises. Journal of Rural Studies. 99, 272-283.
Rodriguez, P., Izuzquiza, D., & Cabrera, A. (2021). Inclusive education at a Spanish University: the voice of students with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 36 (3), 376-398.
Roy, M.J., Donaldson, C., Baker, R., & Kerr, S. (2014). The potential of social enterprise to enhance health and well-being: a model and systematic review. Social Science & Medicine, 123,182-193.
Saaty, R.W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process – what is it and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9 (3-5), 161-176.
Shields, M., Spittal, M., J., Dimov, S., Kavanagh, A., King, T., L. (2022). Employment and disability among young Australians and associations with psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSM-Population health, 19, 101140.
Spear, R., & Bidet, E. (2005). Social enterprise for work integration in 12 European countries: a descriptive analysis. Annals of Public Cooperative Economics, 76, 195-231.
Spear, R., & Bidet, E. (2010). The role of social enterprise in European labour markets. working paper, 03/10, European Research Network, 46.
Teasdale, S. (2010). How can social enterprise address disadvantage? Evidence from an inner city community. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 22, 89-107.
Teasdale, S. (2012). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27 (2), 99-119.
Vidal, I. (2005). Social enterprise and social inclusion: social enterprises in the sphere of work integration. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 807-825.
Westall, A. (2007). Social Enterprise Futures. UK: The Smith Institute.
Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J.E., & Debebe, G. (2003). Interpersonal sensemaking and the meaning of work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 93-135.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.