Допринос процени психолошких ризика у академији коришћењем Карасекових и Сиегристових модела - студија случаја: универзитет Константин I, Алжир

  • Razika Aouad Department of transport engineering, Faculty of technology sciences, Brothor’s Mentouri University, Constantine 1. Algeria
  • Bouzerara Ramdane Constantine1 University Frères Mentouri, Transportation and Environment Engineering Laboratory, Transport Engineering Department, Route d’Ain El bey 25000 Constantine, Algeria
  • Chaib Rachid Constantine1 University Frères Mentouri, Transportation and Environment Engineering Laboratory, Transport Engineering Department, Route d’Ain El bey 25000 Constantine, Algeria
  • Ion Verzea The “Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Bulevardul Profesor Dimitrie Mangeron 67, Iași 700050, Roumania
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm18-44420
Ključne reči: КАРАСЕК и СИЕГРИСТ модел, психолошки ризици, напрезање у послу, универзитет

Sažetak


This study is devoted to psychosocial risks in the university environment. Exposure to psychosocial risks is detailed using existing job and professional nomenclatures. Prevention approaches are all the more effective if they are adapted to the field in which they are deployed. After reviewing each dimension, an analysis of overall exposure to PSRs is carried out. The objective of our study is to contribute to the evaluation of psychosocial risks of university administration personnel, by proposing solutions and recommendations. As a case study, we have taken the Faculty of Science and Technology of the University of Constantine1, Algeria. This study is based on the KARASEK model, composed of 26 questions, and then completed with 6 questions of the SIEGRIST model. As a result of the study, most of the employees suffer from work stress and psychological stress. Therefore, the management should implement preventive actions that meet the expectations of the employees to encourage, appreciate and support them at work.

Reference

Chemelo, V.S., Né, Y.G.S, Frazão, D.R & Souza-Rodrigues, R.D (2020). Is There Association Between Stress and Bruxism? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Headache and Neurogenic Pain, 11, 590-779.

Fabio, R.A, Picciotto, G., & Caprì, T. (2021). The effects of psychosocial and cognitive stress on executive functions and automatic processes in healthy subjects: A pilot study. Cognitive Psychology, 41 (95), 1-10.

Flora, L. (1990). Karasek Model. Edu Academia. University of Paris. https://www.academia.edu/40818747/.

Gellman, M.D & Turner, J.R. (2013). (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine., New York, NY, USA: Springer

Giannakakis, G., Grigoriadis, D., Giannakaki, K., Simantiraki, O., Roniotis, A., & Tsiknakis, M. (2019). Review on psychological stress detection using biosignals. IEEE transactions on affective computing, 13, (1), 440-460.

Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York. USA: Basic books

Karasek, R.A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 (2), 285-308.

Kunz, C. (2019). The influence of working conditions on health satisfaction, physical and mental health: testing the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model and its moderation with over-commitment using a representative sample of German employees (GSOEP). BMC Public Health 19, Article number: 1009.

Maamri, N., Chaib, R., & Benidir, M. (2021). Covid-19 safety measures in companies for employee's well-being and business sustainability. International journal of recent advances in multidisciplinary research, 8 (3), 6687-6693.

Selye, H. (1998). A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 10, 230–231.

Siegrist, J. (2016). A Theoretical Model in the Context of Economic Globalization. Work Stress and Health in a Globalized Economy, 3-19.

Siegrist J. (2017). The effort–reward imbalance model. Book: the handbook of stress and health: a guide to research and practice, 24-35.

Siegrist, J., Siegrist, K., & Weber, I. (1986). Sociological concepts in the etiology of chronic disease: The case of ischemic heart disease. Social science and medicine, 22 (2), 247-253.

Stanhope, J. (2017). Effort–Reward Imbalance questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 67 (4), 314-315.

Van Wassenhove W (2014). Model of karasek. Boek: Dictionary of psychosocial risks. 24. In: Zawieja, P., & Guarnieri, F. Dictionary psychosocial risks, Paris: Le Seuil, 170-174.

Vassiley A., Dayaram K., Barratt T., & Burgess J. (2023).Workplace psychosocial hazards: employment relations frameworks and implications for workers' health and safety, Journal of Industrial Relations. https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/JIR%20SI%20WPH%20CfP%20PDF-1652950555413.pdf

Williams, J.A., Buxton, O., Hinde, J., Bray, J., & Berkman, L. (2018). Psychosocial workplace factors and healthcare utilization: a study of two employers. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7 (7), 614–622.

Zhu, Y., Quansah, P.E., Obeng, A.F. & Cobbinah, E. (2020). Investigating the Effects of Role Demands, Psychosocial Stress Symptoms and Safety Leadership on Mineworkers’ Safety Performance. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 13, 419-436.

Objavljeno
2023/11/16
Broj časopisa
Vol. 18 Br. 2 (2023): Serbian Journal of Management
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak

The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.

 

Cession

 

The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.

 

The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;

 

SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval

 

The Author warrants to SJM that:

 

- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;

 

- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;

 

- the Work is an original work created by the Author;

 

- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.

 

The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.

 

No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.

 

Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.