Искуства едукатора у учењу и намера да користе платформе система за управљање учењем на мрежи: студија перцепције
Sažetak
Ова студија испитује усвајање и употребу Система за управљање онлајн учењем (СУОУ) на државним универзитетима у Индији, наглашавајући утицај претходних искустава инструктора у онлајн учењу. Да бисмо ово постигли, користили смо модел прихватања технологије (МПТ) као теоријску основу, проширивши његов обим да обухвати спољне факторе и перципиране варијабле повезане са усвајањем СУОУ. Истражујемо обрасце усвајања СУОУ, преференције платформе и утицај статуса власништва на технолошку интеграцију користећи податке анкете добијене од чланова факултета на десет најбољих државних универзитета. Кроз ригорозну анкету спроведену међу 326 испитаника са факултета из цењених институција и универзитета, ушли смо у њихова искуства, изазове и уочене користи повезане са коришћењем СУОУ. Наши подаци показују да је Моодле најраспрострањенија СУОУ платформа, са 85% испитаних универзитета који користи овај систем отвореног кода. Штавише, идентификујемо важан утицај који претходна искуства едукатора на мрежи имају у обликовању њиховог мишљења о СУОУ, наглашавајући потребу за опсежном обуком и континуираним програмима подршке. Штавише, наши налази наглашавају потребу за даљим истраживањем како би се истражила ефикасност различитих СУОУ платформи, лонгитудиналним студијама за праћење дугорочних ефеката усвајања и квалитативним истраживањима перспектива и искустава наставника. Фокусирајући се на ове истраживачке правце, заинтересоване стране могу побољшати интеграцију технологије у образовним окружењима, што резултира ефикаснијим и инклузивнијим окружењима за учење.
Reference
Ajibade, P. (2019). Technology acceptance model limitations and criticisms: Exploring the practical applications and use in technology-related studies, mixed-method, and qualitative research. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1941.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 11-39.
Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40 (1), 133–148.
Altawalbeh, M.A. (2023). Adoption of Academic Staff to use the Learning Management System (LMS): Applying Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM2) for Jordanian Universities. International Journal on Studies in Education, 5 (3), 288–300.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2000). Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(4), 411-420.
Braeken, J., & Van Assen, M.A.L.M. (2017). An empirical Kaiser criterion. Psychological Methods, 22 (3), 450–466.
Chen, C.K. & Almunawar, M.N. (2021). Cloud Learning Management System in Higher Education. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Research Anthology on Architectures, Frameworks, and Integration Strategies for Distributed and Cloud Computing. IGI Global. 1564-1586
Davis, F.D. (1989). 249008. Perceived Usefuness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F.D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: Three experiments. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 45 (1), 19–45.
Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
de Oliveira Júnior, P. R. Z., Lucas Azevedo de Oliveira, T. C. de S. (2018). Student ́s Attitudes Towards Probability and Statistics and Academic Achievement on Higher Education. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 11(2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.11.2.4.44
Duin, A.H., & Tham, J. (2020). The Current State of Analytics: Implications for Learning Management System (LMS) Use in Writing Pedagogy. Computers and Composition, 55, 102544.
Eom, S.B. (2014). Understanding e-learners’ satisfaction with learning management systems. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 16 (2–3), 10–13.
Faisal, F., Abidin, Z., & Haryanto, H. (2021). Enterprise risk management (ERM) and firm value: The mediating role of investment decisions. Cogent Economics and Finance, 9 (1), 1-15.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
Gautreau, C. (2011). Motivational factors affecting the integration of a learning management system by faculty. Journal of Educators Online, 8 (1), 1–25.
Gómez-Ramirez, I., Valencia-Arias, A., & Duque, L. (2019). Approach to M-learning Acceptance Among University Students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20 (3), 141–164.
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46 (1–2), 1–12.
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31 (1), 2–24.
Hanif, A., Jamal, F. Q., & Imran, M. (2018). Extending the technology acceptance model for use of e-learning systems by digital learners. IEEE Access, 6, 73395–73404.
Irfandi, Festiyed, Yerimadesi, Sudarma, T.F. (2023). The use of learning management system (lms) in the teaching and learning process : literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 12 (1), 81-90.
Judge, D.S., & Murray, B. (2017). Student and Faculty Transition to a New Online Learning Management System. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12 (4), 277–280.
Ketchen, D.J. (2013). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Long Range Planning , 46 (1–2), 184-185.
Lee, A.S.H., & Lim, T.M. (2016). Behavioral intention to use knowledge sharing tools: Positive and negative affect on Affective Technology Acceptance Model. In: Knowledge 8th Management International Conference, 191–196.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 40 (3), 191–204.
Lim, T.S., Mail, R., Abd Karim, M.R., Ahmad Baharul Ulum, Z.K., Jaidi, J., & Noordin, R. (2018). A serial mediation model of financial knowledge on the intention to invest: The central role of risk perception and attitude. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 20, 74–79.
Liu, I.F., Chen, M.C., Sun, Y.S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C.H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers and Education, 54 (2), 600–610.
Lu, C., Huang, S., & Lo, P. (2010). An empirical study of on-line tax filing acceptance model : Integrating TAM and TPB. African Journal of Business Management, 4 (5), 800–810.
Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: An empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27 (1), 6–30.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J.F. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5 (1), 105–115.
Sejzi, A.A., & Aris, B. (2013). Learning Management System ( LMS ) and Learning Content Management System ( LCMS ) at Virtual University. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education, 2 (1), 216–220.
Sentosa, I. , & Nik Mat, N.-K.. (2012). Examining a Theory of Planned Behavior (Tpb) and Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) in Internet purchasing Using Structural Equation Modeling. Journal ofArts, Science & Commerce, 3 (2), 62–77.
Simanullang, N.H.S., & Rajagukguk, J. (2020). Learning Management System (LMS) Based on Moodle to Improve Students Learning Activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1462, 012067.
Sulaiman, T.T. (2024). A systematic review on factors influencing learning management system usage in Arab gulf countries. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2503–2521.
Tallent-Runnels, M.K., Thomas, J.A., Lan, W.Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T.C., Shaw, S.M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76 (1), 93–135.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions Subject Areas: Design Characteristics, Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39 (2), 273–315.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27 (3), 425–478.
Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44 (1), 119–134.
Winter, S.J., Sheats, J.L., Salvo, D., Banda, J.A., Quinn, J., Rivera, B.R., & King, A.C. (2020). A Mixed Method Study to Inform the Implementation and Expansion of Pop-Up Parks for Economic, Behavioral, and Social Benefits. Journal of Urban Health, 97 (4), 529–542.
Wong, C.W.Y., Lai, K.H., Shang, K.C., Lu, C.S., & Leung, T.K.P. (2012). Green operations and the moderating role of environmental management capability of suppliers on manufacturing firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 140 (1), 283–294.
Wu, I.L., & Chen, J.L. (2005). An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 62 (6), 784–808.
Xu, H., & Mahenthiran, S. (2016). Factors that Influence Online Learning Assessment and Satisfaction: Using Moodle as a Learning Management System. International Business Research, 9 (2), 1-18.
Yadav, R., Shiva, A., & Narula, S. (2024). Exploring private university attractiveness from students’ perspective to ensure sustainable institutes: an empirical investigation from Indian perspective. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 16 (1), 170-203.
Yang, H.H., & Su, C.H. (2017). Learner behaviour in a MOOC practice-oriented course: In empirical study integrating TAM and TPB. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18 (5), 35–63.
Zhang, E.M. (2010). Understanding the Acceptance of Mobile SMS Advertising among Young Chinese Consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 30 (6), 461–469.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.