Утицај вакуума знања на иновациони процес током спајања организација за јавно истраживање

  • Kirana Rukmayuninda Ririh IPB University
  • Machfud IPB University
  • Elisa IPB University
  • Nurul National Research and Innovation Agency
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm19-48504
Ključne reči: вакуум знања, иновациони процес, менаџерска подршка, удружена организација заснована на истраживању, моделовање структурне једначине

Sažetak


Одржавање иновационог процеса током спајања у спојену јавну истраживачку организацију је приличан изазов. Вакуум знања је потенцијално растући проблем због спајања. Ова студија има за циљ да испита вакуум знања као интервентну улогу између организационих фактора и индивидуалног фактора, а такође и како утиче на процес иновације. PLS-SEM је примењен коришћењем софтвера SmartPLS 4.0, а 198 иновационих актера је учествовало у анкетирању. Изненађујуће, резултати показују да вакуум знања позитивно и значајно утиче на способност апсорпције и прилагођавања да се формирају дистинктивне компетенције. То показује да ће недостајући токови знања међу актерима високих перформанси, као што су иноватори, побољшати компетенције током хаотичног догађаја због спајања. Поред тога, карактеристичне компетенције имају значајан позитиван утицај на иновациони процес. Са друге стране, вакуум знања нема директну везу са карактеристичним компетенцијама. Управљање ресурсима и инфраструктуром доприноси позитивном формирању вакума знања током спајања како би се створила снажна апсорпциона и адаптивна способност и криве истакнутих дистинктивних компетенција, које ће на крају позитивно утицати на процес иновације.

 

Reference

Aagaard, K., Hansen, H.F., & Rasmussen, J.G. (2016). Mergers between governmental research

institutes and Universities in the Danish HE sector. European Journal of Higher Education, 6 (1), 41–55.

Agolla, J.E., & Van Lill, J.B. (2017). Insights into Kenya’s public sector innovation: The case of managers. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9 (3), 225–243.

Ali, M. (2021). Imitation or innovation: To what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120527.

Arias-Pérez, J., Velez-Ocampo, J., & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2021). Strategic orientation toward digitalization to improve innovation capability: why knowledge acquisition and exploitation through external embeddedness matter. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1319–1335.

Bai, T., & Liesch, P. (2022). Organizational goals and resource allocation to overseas foreign direct investment. Journal of World Business, 57 (3), 101308.

Bashir, M., Alfalih, A., & Pradhan, S. (2023). Managerial ties, business model innovation & SME performance: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8 (1), 100329.

Bennato, A.R., Davies, S., Mariuzzo, F., & Ormosi, P. (2021). Mergers and innovation: Evidence from the hard disk drive market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 77, 102755.

Berkhout, A. J., Hartmann, D., Van Der Duin, P., & Ortt, R. (2006). Innovating the innovation process. International Journal of Technology Management, 34 (3–4), 390–404.

Bouguerra, A., Mellahi, K., Glaister, K., Sadeghi, A., Temouri, Y., & Tatoglu, E. (2022). Absorptive capacity and organizational performance in an emerging market context: Evidence from the banking industry in Turkey. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1575–1587.

Chapman, G., Lucena, A., & Afcha, S. (2018). R&D subsidies & external collaborative breadth: Differential gains and the role of collaboration experience. Research Policy, 47 (3), 623–636.

Cheah, S.L.Y., & Ho, Y.P. (2021). Commercialization performance of outbound open innovation projects in public research organizations: The roles of innovation potential and organizational capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, 229–241.

Choi, T., & Chandler, S. M. (2020). Knowledge vacuum: An organizational learning dynamic of how e-government innovations fail. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (1), 101416.

Duan, Y., Deng, Z., Liu, H., Yang, M., Liu, M., & Wang, X. (2022). Exploring the mediating effect of managerial ability on knowledge diversity and innovation performance in reverse cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing corporations. International Journal of Production Economics, 247, 108434.

Engelsberger, A., Bartram, T., Cavanagh, J., Halvorsen, B., & Bogers, M. (2023). The role of collaborative human resource management in supporting open innovation: A multi-level model. Human Resource Management Review, 33 (2), 100942.

Fernandez, A.I., Lara, P.R., Ugalde, M.C., & Sisodia, G.S. (2018). Distinctive competencies and competency-based management in regulated sectors: A methodological proposal applied to the pharmaceutical retail sector in Spain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 29–36.

Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

Haneda, S., & Ito, K. (2018). Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? Research Policy, 47 (1), 194–208.

Haucap, J., Rasch, A., & Stiebale, J. (2019). How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence.

International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 283–325.

Heller-Schuh, B., Lepori, B., & Neuländtner, M. (2020). Mergers and acquisitions in the public research sector. Toward a comprehensive typology. Research Evaluation, 29 (4), 366–376.

Hulke, C., & Revilla Diez, J. (2020). Building adaptive capacity to external risks through collective action – Social learning mechanisms of smallholders in rural Vietnam. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 51, 101829.

Isip, M.I.G. (2022). Adaptive capability of micro agribusiness firms: Qualitative evidence from the Philippines. Research in Globalization, 5, 100087.

Kafouros, M., Love, J.H., Ganotakis, P., & Konara, P. (2020). Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119757.

Kang, Y., & Liu, R. (2021). Does the merger of universities promote their scientific research performance? Evidence from China. Research Policy, 50 (1), 104098.

Khan, A., & Tao, M. (2022). Knowledge absorption capacity’s efficacy to enhance innovation performance through big data analytics and digital platform capability. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 7 (3), 100201.

Khan, G.F., Sarstedt, M., Shiau, W.L., Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., & Fritze, M.P. (2019). Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An analysis based on social network approaches. Internet Research, 29 (3), 407–429.

Li, Y., Mbanyele, W., & Sun, J. (2022). Managerial R&D hands-on experience, state ownership, and corporate innovation. China Economic Review, 72, 101766.

Manning, L., Morris, W., & Birchmore, I. (2021). Organisational forgetting: The food safety risk associated with unintentional knowledge loss. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 118 (Part A), 242–251.

Martínez-Sánchez, A., Vicente-Oliva, S., & Pérez-Pérez, M. (2020). The relationship between R&D, the absorptive capacity of knowledge, human resource flexibility and innovation: Mediator effects on industrial firms. Journal of Business Research, 118, 431–440.

Mukherjee, A. (2022). Merger and process innovation. Economics Letters, 213, 110366.

Nicolas, C., Kim, J., & Chi, S. (2020). Quantifying the dynamic effects of smart city development enablers using structural equation modeling. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101916.

Palacios-Marqués, D., García, M.G., Sánchez, M.M., & Mari, M.P.A. (2019). Social entrepreneurship and organizational performance: A study of the mediating role of distinctive competencies in marketing. Journal of Business Research, 101, 426–432.

Piwowar-Sulej, K. (2022). Environmental strategies and human resource development consistency: Research in the manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 330, 129538.

Ririh, K.R., Anggraeni, E., Machfud, M., & Rochman, N.T. (2023). Distinctive Competencies and Process of Innovation During Organizationals Merger: The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Vacuum. STI Policy and Management Journal, 8 (1), 43-57.

Salehi, V., & Veitch, B. (2020). Measuring and analyzing adaptive capacity at management levels of resilient systems. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 63, 104001.

Selviaridis, K. (2021). Effects of public procurement of R&D on the innovation process: evidence from the UK small business research initiative. Journal of Public Procurement, 21 (3), 229–259.

Singh, S., Dhir, S., Gupta, A., Das, V.M., & Sharma, A. (2021). Antecedents of innovation implementation: a review of literature with meta-analysis. Foresight, 23 (3), 273–298.

Stipp, D.M., Pimenta, M.L., & Jugend, D. (2018). Innovation and cross-functional teams: Analysis of innovative initiatives in a Brazilian public organization. Team Performance Management, 24(1– 2), 84–105.

Symeonidou, N., Leiponen, A., Autio, E., & Bruneel, J. (2022). The origins of capabilities: Resource allocation strategies, capability development, and the performance of new firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 37 (4), 106208.

Tseng, M.L., Bui, T.D., & Lim, M.K. (2021). Resource utilization model for sustainable solid waste management in Vietnam: A crisis response hierarchical structure. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 171, 105632.

Uhm, C.H., Sung, C.S., & Park, J. Y. (2018). Understanding the accelerator from resources-based perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12 (3), 258-278.

van Assche, K., Valentinov, V., & Verschraegen, G. (2021). Adaptive governance learning from what organizations do and managing the role they play. Kybernetes. 51 (5), 1738-1758.

Wensley, A.K.P., & Navarro, J.G.C. (2015). Overcoming knowledge loss through the utilization of an unlearning context. Journal of Business Research, 68 (7), 1563–1569.

Xiong, X., Yang, G. liang, Zhou, D. qun, & Wang, Z. long. (2022). How to allocate multi-period research resources? Centralized resource allocation for public universities in China using a parallel DEA-based approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82 (PB), 101317.

Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Daim, T.U. (2023). The voluntary green behavior in green technology innovation: The dual effects of green human resource management system and leader green traits. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114049.

Objavljeno
2024/12/05
Broj časopisa
Vol. 19 Br. 2 (2024): Serbian Journal of Management
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak

The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.

 

Cession

 

The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.

 

The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;

 

SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval

 

The Author warrants to SJM that:

 

- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;

 

- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;

 

- the Work is an original work created by the Author;

 

- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.

 

The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.

 

No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.

 

Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.