Разумевање ставова према климатским променама у контексту поверења у изабраним земљама централне и источне Европе
Sažetak
Иако у научним и политичким дискусијама расте тренд разматрања ставова људи према климатским променама у контексту поверења, адекватних истраживања у овој области у Централној и Источној Европи (ЦИЕ) недостаје. Овај чланак има за циљ да утврди да ли је поверење важан фактор за перцепцију климатских промена код становника изабраних земаља ЦИЕ. Користећи податке из десетог круга Европске социјалне анкете (ESS), примењен је метод мултиваријабилне бинарне логистичке регресије. У раду се разматрају три различите димензије климатских промена: брига, личне норме и атрибуција, као и саставни индикатор који одражава ставове о клими (скептик или заговорник). Представљена су четири различита модела која се разликују само по зависним променљивама, док су независна променљива (поверење) и контролне променљиве (социо-демографске променљиве) исте у свим случајевима. Резултати показују да је и лично и институционално поверење веома ниско у изабраним земљама. Институционално поверење било је значајно у сва четири модела, док је лично поверење било значајно у моделима еколошке норме и скептицизма. Веће поверење у институције смањује вероватноћу да ће појединци бити забринути због климатских промена и повећава вероватноћу да ће осећати личну одговорност за њихово ублажавање. Повећан ниво личног или институционалног поверења повећава шансе за припадност групи заговорника климатских промена. Од испитиваних социо-демографских променљивих, само политичка скала лево-десно није значајно утицала на ставове.
Reference
Abbott, S., & Freeth, D. (2008). Social Capital and Health: Starting to Make Sense of the Role of Generalized Trust and Reciprocity. Journal of Health Psychology, 13 (7), 874–883.
Adam, F., & Roncevic, B. (2003). Social Capital: Recent Debates and Research Trends. Social Science Information, 42, 155–183.
Algan, Y. (2018). Trust and social capital. In Joseph E. Stiglitz, Jean-Paul Fitoussi and Martine Durand (eds.), For Good Measure: Advancing Research on Well-being Metrics Beyond GDP, pp. 283–320, Paris, FR: OECD Publishing,
Adam S., Reber U., Haussler T., & Schmid-Petri H. (2020). How climate change skeptics (try to) spread their ideas: Using computational methods to assess the resonance among skeptics’ and legacy media. PLoS ONE, 15 (10), e0240089.
Ahrendt, D., Consolini, M., Mascherini, M., & Sandor, E. (2022). Living, working and COVID-19 e-survey. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Retrieved August 08, 2023, from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/topic/trust
Bagnasco, A. (2006). Trust and Social Capital. In The Blackwell companion to political sociology (eds K. Nash and A. Scott) Blackwell publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696071.ch21
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84 (2), 191–215.
Baiardi, D., & Morana, C., (2021). Climate change awareness: empirical evidence for the European Union. Energy Econ. 96 (1).
Beckmann, E., Dvorsky, S. & Scheiber, T. (2013). Trust in the EU in CESEE, Focus on European Economic Integration, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), 2, 77–90.
Beiser-McGrath, L.F., & Huber, R.A. (2018). Assessing the relative importance of psychological and demographic factors for predicting climate and environmental attitudes. Climatic Change, 149, 335–347.
Binder, M., & Blankenberg, A.K. (2017). Green lifestyles and subjective well-being: More about self-image than actual behavior?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 137, 304–323.
Boda, Z., & Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). Does Institutional Trust in East Central Europe Differ from Western Europe?. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 3 (2), 1–17.
Bodor, Á., Varjú, V., & Grünhut, Z. (2020). The effect of trust on the various dimensions of climate change attitudes. Sustainability, 12 (23), 10200.
Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A., (2016). Stereotypes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131 (4), 1753–1794.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by John G Richardson, pp. 241–58. New York: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, p. 119.
Brewer, P.R., & Ley, B.L. (2013). Whose science do you believe? Expanding trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication, 35 (1), 115–137.
Cacciatore, M.A., Browning, N., Scheufele, D.A., Brossard, D., & Xenos, M.A. (2016). Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities. Public Understanding of Science, 27 (1), 11–28.
Capstick, S., Whitmarsh, L., Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., & Upham, P. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6 (1), 35–61.
Capstick, S.B., (2012). Climate Change Discourses in Use by the UK Public: Commonalities and Variations Over a Fifteen Year Period. Cardiff University. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/24182/ (Doctoral Thesis).
Capstick, S.B, & Pidgeon, N.F. (2014). What is climate change scepticism? Examination of the concept using a mixed methods study of the UK public. Global Environmental Change, 24 (2014), 389–401.
Chaisty, P., & Whitefield, S., (2015). Attitudes towards the environment: are post-Communist societies (still) different?. Environmental Politics, 24 (4), 598–616.
Claridge, T. (2004). Social Capital and Natural Resource Management an important role for social capital? Unpublished Thesis, Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Cologna, V. & Siegrist, M. (2020). The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 69, 101428.
DeCoster, J., Gallucci, M., & Iselin, A.-M. (2011). Best Practices for Using Median Splits, Artificial Categorization, and their Continuous Alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2 (2), 197–209.
Edelman Trust Barometer (2022). Trust and Climate Change. Special Report. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2022-01/2022%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer%20FINAL_Jan25.pdf.
Ehret, P., Boven, L., & Sherman, D.K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9 (3), 308–318.
Ekholm, S. (2020). Swedish mothers’ and fathers’ worries about climate change: a gendered story. Journal of Risk Research, 23 (3), 288–296.
Engels, A., Huther, O., Schafer, M., & Held, H. (2013). Public climate-change skepticism, energy preferences and political participation. Global Environmental Change. 23, 1018–1027.
Eurofound (2021), Living, working and COVID-19 (Update April 2021): Mental health and trust decline across EU as pandemic enters another year, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Social Survey (2011). Trust in Justice: Topline Results from Round 5 of the European Social Survey. ESS Topline Results Series. Issue 1. Retrieved April 05, 2023, from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS5_toplines_issue_1_trust_in_justice.pdf.
European Social Survey (2018). European Attitudes to Climate Change and Energy: Topline Results from Round 8 of the European Social Survey. Retrieved March 22, 2023, from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS8_toplines_issue_9_climatechange.pdf.
European Social Survey (2020a). Sampling guidelines. Retrieved August 6, 2023 from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round10/methods/ESS10_sampling_guidelines.pdf.
European Social Survey (2020b). Guide to Using Weights and Sample Design Indicators with ESS Data. Retrieved August 6, 2023 from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/methodology/ESS_weighting_data_1_1.pdf
Fage-Butler, A., Ledderer, L., & Nielsen, K.H. (2022). Public trust and mistrust of climate science: a meta-narrative review. Public Understanding of Science, 31 (7), 832–846.
Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2019). Political trust and the relationship between climate change beliefs and support for fossil fuel taxes: Evidence from a survey of 23 European countries. Global Environmental Change, 59, 102003.
Fisher, S.D., Kenny, J., Poortinga, W., Bohm, G., & Steg, L. (2022). The politicisation of climate change attitudes in Europe. Electoral Studies. 79, 102499.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Fukuyama, F (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust workplace. Stern Business Magazine 4.
Fukuyama F. (2000). Social Capital in Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, L. E. Harrison, S. P. Huntington (ed.), p. 98–111. New York: Basic Books.
Genschel, P., Hemerijck, A., Russo, L., & Nasr, M. (2021). Solidarity and Trust in Times of COVID-19. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSC.
Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., et al. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: an 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1–12.
Gregersen, T., Doran, R., Böhm, G., Tvinnereim, E. & Poortinga, W. (2020). Political Orientation Moderates the Relationship Between Climate Change Beliefs and Worry About Climate Change. Front. Psychol. 11, 1573.
Haussler T., Schmid-Petri H., Adam S., Reber U., & Arlt, D. (2016). The climate of debate: How institutional factors shape legislative discourses on climate change. A comparative framing perspective. Studies in Communication Sciences, 16 (1), 94–102.
Hoppner, C., & Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Public engagement in climate action: policy and public expectations. In: Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S., Lorenzoni, I. (Eds.), Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Communication and Behaviour Change. Earth-scan, London.
Hornsey, M., Harris, E., Bain, P. et al. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6, 622–626.
Yaacob, M., So, W.W.M., & Iizuka, N. (2022). Exploring Community Perceptions of Climate Change Issues in Peninsular Malaysia. Sustainability, 14 (13), 7756.
Johansson, A., Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2022). Intolerance predicts climate skepticism. Energy Economics, 105 (2022), 105719.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251–1288.
Kulin, J., & Sevä, I.J. (2021) Who do you trust? How trust in partial and impartial government institutions influences climate policy attitudes, Climate Policy, (21) 1, 33–46.
Lin N. (1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 467–487.
Malpass, A., Barnett, C., Clarke, N., & Cloke, P. (2007). Problematizing Choice: responsible consumers and sceptical citizens. In: Bevir, M., Trentmann, F. (Eds.), Governance, Consumers and Citizens: Agency and Resistance in Contemporary Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Markowitz, E., & Shariff, A. (2012). Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2, 243–247.
Marquart-Pyatt, S.T. (2012). Contextual influences on environmental concerns cross-nationally: A multilevel investigation. Social Science Research, 41 (5), 1085–1099.
Marshall, N.A., Thiault, L., Beeden, A., Beeden, R., Benham, C., Curnock, M.I., Diedrich, A., Gurney, G.G., Jones, L., Marshall, P.A., Nakamura, N., & Pert, P. (2019). Our Environmental Value Orientations Influence How We Respond to Climate Change. Front. Psychol, 10, 938.
McCright, A.M., Dunlap, R.E., & Marquart-Pyatt, S.T. (2016). Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 25 (2), 338–358.
Narayan, D., & Cassidy, M.F. (2001). A Dimensional Approach to Measuring Social Capital: Development and Validation of a Social Capital Inventory. Current Sociology, 49 (2), 59–102.
Norton, A., & Leaman, J. (2004). The day after tomorrow: Public opinion on climate change. London: MORI Social Research Institute.
OECD. (2017). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ostrom, E. & Ahn, T. K. (2003). Foundations of Social Capital. Critical studies in economics institutions series, Edward Elgar Reference Collection.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator as-sessment. The American Journal of Sociology, 105 (1), 88-127.
Pearson, A.R., Ballew, M.T., Naiman, S., & Schuldt, J.P. (2017). Race, class, gender and climate change communication. In Oxford research encyclopedia of climate science.
Pietras, C. J. (2022). Rule-Governed Behavior and Climate Change: Why Climate Warnings Fail to Motivate Sufficient Action Behavior and Social Issues, 31, 373–417.
Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2011). Uncertain climate: an investigation of public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21 (3), 1015–1024.
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Böhm, G., Steg, L., & Fisher, S. (2016). ESS Round 8 question module design template: Public attitudes to climate change, energy security, and energy preferences. Bergen, Norway: NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC.
Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., Steg, L., Böhm, G., & Fisher, S. (2019). Climate change perceptions and their individual-level determinants: A cross-European analysis. Global Environ. Change, 55, 25–35.
Puskarova, P. (2022). Trust or bust: Growth effects of knowledge, human and social capital revisited, Economic Systems, (46) 4, 101036
Putnam, R. D, Leonardi R., & Nanetti, R.Y. (1993). Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6 (1), 65–78.
Rahmstorf, S. (2004). The Climate Sceptics. Potsdam: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. Retrieved June 10, 2023, from http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_climate_sceptics_2004.pdf.
Rohrschneider, R., & Miles, M.R. (2015). Representation through parties? Environmental attitudes and party stances in Europe in 2013. Environmental Politics, 24 (4), 617–640.
Roth, F. (2022). Social Capital, Trust, and Economic Growth. In: Intangible Capital and Growth. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham.
Rutjens, B.T., Sutton, R.M., & van der Lee, R. (2018). Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44 (3), 384–405.
Schwartz, S.H., Caprara, G.V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31 (3), 421–452.
Siisiäinen, M. (2000). Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy University of Jyväskylä, p. 2. Retrieved April 11, 2023, from https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7661/siisiainen.pdf?.1
Six, B., van Zimmeren, E., Popa, F., & Frison, C. (2015). Trust and social capital in the design and evolution of institutions for collective action. International Journal of the Commons, 9 (1), 151–176.
Smith, E.K., & Mayer, A. (2018). A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Global Environmental Change, 49, 140–153.
Smith, E.K., & Hempel, L.M. (2022). Alignment of values and political orientations amplifies climate change attitudes and behaviors. Climatic Change, 172 (1-2), 4.
Stefkovics, Á., & Zenovitz, L. (2023). Global warming vs. climate change frames: revisiting framing effects based on new experimental evidence collected in 30 European countries. Climatic Change, 176 (12), 159.
Szkudlarek P., & Biglieri J.V. (2016). Trust as an element of social capital – evidence from a survey of Polish and Spanish students, Journal of International Studies, 9 (1), 252–264.
Sztompka, P. (2007). Zaufanie: fundament społeczeństwa (Trust:The Foundation of Society), Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, Kraków.
Taddicken, M., Reif, A. & Hoppe, I. (2018). What do people know about climate change ― and how confident are they? On measurements and analyses of science related knowledge, Journal of Science Communication, 17 (03), A01
The EIB Climate Survey. (2022). Citizens Call for Green Recovery. Fourth edition 2021-2022. European Investment Bank. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from https://www.eib.org/attachments/publications/the_eib_climate_survey_2021_2022_en.pdf
Thomas, G.O., Fisher, R., Whitmarsh, L., Milfont, T.L., & Poortinga, W. (2018). The impact of parenthood on environmental attitudes and behaviour: a longitudinal investigation of the legacy hypothesis. Population and Environment, 39, 261–276.
Tobler, C., Visschers, V., & Siegrist, M. (2012). Addressing climate change: determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 197–207.
Torche, F., & Valenzuela, E. (2011). Trust and reciprocity: A theoretical distinction of the sources of social capital, European Journal of Social Theory, 14 (2), 181–198.
UNDP. (2021). Trust in public institutions a conceptual framework and insights for improved governance programming. Policy brief. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.undp.org/policy-centre/oslo/publications/policy-brief-trust-public-institutions
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved June 10, 2023, from http://gvptsites.umd.edu/uslaner/uslanermoralfoundations.pdf
Weaver, R. (2018). Exploring the Elements of Social Capital: Leverage Points and Creative Measurement Strategies for Community Building and Program Evaluation. National Civic Review, 107 (1), 16–30
Weber, E.U. (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. WIREs Clim Change, 7, 125–134.
Wojciechowska, M. (2021). Trust as a factor in building cognitive social capital among library workers and users. Implications for library managers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47 (1), 102300.
Wolf, J., & Moser, S.C. (2011). Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in‐depth studies across the world. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2 (4), 547–569.
Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social Trust and Attitudes toward Democracy. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 72 (4), 706–724.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.