Governing higher education institutions in Singapore: an agency framework
Sažetak
It is widely known that governments are changing their relationships with public sector organizations with the aim of improving public sector efficiency and effectiveness. The conceptual understanding of government control and governance approaches in state-owned higher education institutions (HEIs) is, however, less well understood. Undoubtedly, question of the extent of autonomy and control of higher education institutions is of significant interest to administrators and policy-makers. This paper reviews the reforms undertaken by the Singapore government in HEIs especially the university sector. The agency framework is applied to assess the internal and external monitoring mechanisms aimed to protect the interest of the public. The paper finds that there is still much state presence and intervention in HEIs’ activities despite the government’s attempt to develop autonomous universities. Strengthening the corporate governance standard of the HEIs will offer a useful means to increase the willingness of the government to give more control to the HEI administrators.
Reference
Cham, T.S. (2014). The Making of NTU: My Story. Singapore: Straits Times Press.
Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62, 503-517.
Christopher, J. (2014). Australian public universities: are they practicing a corporate approach to governance? Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 560-573.
Clark, B. (1983). The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross National Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Conyon, M.J. and Murphy, K. (2000) The Prince and the Pauper? CEO Pay in the United States and the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 110, 640-71.
De Silva Lokuwaduge, C. and Armstrong, A. (2012). Evaluation of corporate governance measures: an application to the Australian higher education sector. Journal of business systems governance and ethics, 7(1), 76-86.
Dobbins, M., Knill,, C. and Vogtle, E.M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62, 665-683.
Ehrenberg, R. (2013). Is the golden age of the private research university over? Change, 45(3), 16-23.
Ehrenberg, R. and Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 647-659.
Enders, J., de Boer, H. and Weyer, E. (2013). Regulatory autonomy and performance: the reform of higher education re-visited. Higher Education, 65, 5-23.
Fielden, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Galbraith, J.K. (1996). The Good Society: The Humane Agenda. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.
Goh, C.B. and Tan, W.H. (2008). The development of university education in Singapore. In Lee, S.K., Goh, C.B., Fredriksen, B. and Tan, J.P. (Eds) Toward a better future: education and training for economic development in Singapore since 1965. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
Hayrinen-Alestalo, M. and Peltola, U. (2006). The problem of a market-oriented university. Higher Education, 52, 251-281.
Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
King, R.P. (2007). Governance and accountability in the higher education regulatory state. Higher Education, 53, 411-430.
MacAvoy, P.W. and Millstein, I.M. (2003). The Recurrent Crisis in Corporate Governance. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Mak, Y.T. and Phan, P. (1999). Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Perspective, Conference Proceedings Seoul, March 1999, OECD Report.
Ministry of Education, Singapore (2012). Report of the Committee on University Education Pathways Beyond 2015 (CUEP). Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Mok, Ka Ho (2010). When state centralism meets neo-liberalism: managing university governance change in Singapore and Malaysia, Higher Education, 60, 419-440.
Monks, R. and Minow, N. (2011). Corporate Governance (5th Ed). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Nanyang Technological University (2013). Rising Elite Young: A Remarkable Ascent Annual Report 2013. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
National University of Singapore (2013). National University of Singapore Annual Report 2013. Singapore: National University of Singapore.
OECD (2013). Education at a Glance. Paris: OECD.
Singapore Management University (2013). Annual Report to Stakeholders 2012/2013. Singapore: Singapore Management University.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.