The operationalisation of the R&D assessment framework in Magneti Marelli Serbia
Sažetak
This paper has twofold purpose. Firstly, an assessment method aimed to evaluate R&D strategic performance indicators is introduced. The proposed framework is based on fuzzy set theory which represents an adequate tool for quantitatively describing the vague and ambiguous nature of the R&D function. The second purpose of the paper is to analyze relevant R&D performance indicators in Magneti Marelli S.p.A. Serbia, a leading supplier in Serbian automotive industry. Specific findings of this empirical analysis are discussed and suggestions for further research are provided.
Reference
Baglieri, E., Chiesa, V., Grando, A., Manzini, R., (2001). Evaluating Intagible Assets: The Measurement of R&D Performance, Research Division Working Paper, No. 01/49.
Banwet, D.K., Deshmukh, S.G., (2006). Balanced scorecard for Performance Evaluation of R&D Organization: A Conceptual Model, Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, Vol. 65, 879-886.
Carlsson, C., Fuller, R., Majlender, P. (2005), A Fuzzy Real Options Model for R&D Project Evaluation, Proceedings of the Eleventh IFSA World Congress, 1650-1654.
Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., (2009). Evaluation and Performance Measurement of Research and Development: Techniques and Perspectives for Multi-Level Analysis, Edward Elgar Publishing.
Chiesa, V., Frattini, F., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., (2009), Performance Measurement in R&D: Exploring the Interplay Between Measurement Objectives, Dimensions of Performance and Contextual Factors, R&D Management, Vol.39, Issue 5, 487-519.
Coffin, M.A., Taylor, B.W., (1996). Multiple Criteria R&D Project Selection and Scheduling Using Fuzzy Logic, Computers & Operations Research, Vo. 23, Issue 3, 207-220.
Huang, C.C., Chu, P.Y., Chiang, Y.H., (2008). A Fuzzy AHP Application in Government-Sponsored R&D Project Selection, Omega, Vol. 36, Issue 6. 1038-1052.
Kerssens-van Drongelen, I.C., Bilderbeek, J., (1999), R&D Performance Measurement: More Than Choosing a Set of Metrics, R&D Management, Vol. 29, Issue 1, 35-46.
Kosko, B., (1994). Fuzzy Systems as Universal Approximators, IEEE Transactions Computers, Vol. 43, issue 11, 1329-1333.
Lager T., (2011). Managing Process Innovation: From Idea Generation to Implementation, Imperial College Press.
Lee, M., Son, B., Lee, H., (1996). Measuring R&D Effectiveness in Korean Companies, Research Technology Management, Vol. 39, No. 6, 28-31.
Ojanen, V., Vuola, O., (2006). Coping with the Multiple Dimensions of R&D Performance Analysis, International Journal of Technology, Vol. 33, 279 – 290.
Pappas, R.A., Remer, D.S., (1985). Measuring R&D Productivity, Research Management, Vol. 28, No. 3, 15-22.
Pešić, A., Pešić, D., Tepavčević A., (2012). A New Strategic Tool For Internal Audit Of The Company Based On Fuzzy Logic, ComSIS Journal, Vol 9, No. 2, 653-666.
Pešić, D., Pešić, A., Ivković, S., (2015). Quantifying Strategic Performance Indicators of R&D Function in an Industrial Organization, International May Conference on Strategic Management - IMKSM2015, The Book of Proceedings, Bor, 62-71.
Ross, T.J. (2004). Fuzzy Logic With Engineering Applications, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Wang, J., Hwang, W.L., (2007). A Fuzzy Set Approach for R&D Portfolio Selection Using a Real Options Valuation Model, Omega, Vol. 35, Issue 3, 247-257.
Werner, B.M., Souder, W.E., (1997), Measuring R&D Performance – State of the Art, Research Technology Management, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 34-42.
Zimmermann, H.J., (2001). Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Four Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.