Model za ocenu konzistentnosti rezultata metoda višekriterijumskog odlučivanja
Sažetak
U ovom radu prikazan je model za ocenu konzistentnosti rezultata metoda višekriterijumskog odlučivanja (VKO) i izbor optimalne metode. Model se zasniva na analizi rezultata metoda VKO odnosno, analizi promena u rangovima metoda VKO koje nastaju usled promene ulaznih parametara. U predloženom modelu ispituje se analiza osetljivosti rezulata metoda VKO na promenu težina kritrijuma i konzistentnost rešenja metoda na promene merne skale i načina formulacije kriterijuma. U završnoj fazi modela vrši se izbor najpovoljnije metode VKO za rešavanje posmatranog problema i izbor optimalne alternative. Model je testiran na primeru izbora optimalne metode VKO za određivanje lokacije logističkog centra. Prilikom izbora optimalne metode za rešavanje posmatranog problema razmatrane su metode TOPSIS, COPRAS, VIKOR i ELECTRE
Reference
Ahari, R.M., & Niaki, S.T.A. (2014). A hybrid approach based on locally linear neuro-fuzzy modeling and TOPSIS to determine the quality grade of gas well-drilling projects, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 114, 99–106.
Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran M., Sasirekha V. (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry, Expert Systems with Applications 41, 2964–2980.
Awasthi, A., Omrani, H., & Gerber, P. (2013). Multicriteria decision making for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects, CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper No 2013-01, pp. 1-31
Bach, E., & Bridy, A. (2013). On the number of distinct functional graphs of affine-linear transformations over finite fields, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 439, 1312–1320.
Barysiene, J. (2012). A multi-criteria evaluation of container terminal technologies applying the COPRAS-G method. Transport, 27(4), 364–372.
Bottani, E., & Rizzi, A. (2006). A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11(4), 294–308.
Camparo, J. (2013). A geometrical approach to the ordinal data of Likert scaling and attitude measurements: The density matrix in psychology, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 57, 29–42.
Chang, T.H. (2014). Fuzzy VIKOR method: A case study of the hospital service evaluation in Taiwan, Information Sciences, 271, 196–212.
Chang, C.H., Lin, J.J., Linc, J.H., Chiang, M.C. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6): 4642-4649.;
Chen S., & Liu, X. (2006). Factors and a Method of Selecting a Site for a Logistical Centre. Journal of Weinan Teachers College, 2, 20-23.
Corrente, S., Figueira, J., & Greco, S. (2014). The SMAA-PROMETHEE method, European Journal of Operational Researsch 239(2), 514–522
French, S. (1988). Decision theory - an introduction to the mathematics of rationality, Chrichster, Ellis Horwood Ltd.
Ghoseiri, K., & Lessan, J. (2008). Location selection for logistic centres using a two-step fuzzy AHP and ELECTE method. Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference, Indonesia, 434-440.
Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B., & Shahanaghi, K. (2007). A holistic approach based on MCDM for solving location problems. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics, 20(3), 252-262.
Kaboli, A., Aryanezhad, M. B., & Shahanaghi, K. (2007). A holistic approach based on MCDM for solving location problems. International Journal of Engineering Transactions A: Basics, 20(3), 252-262.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, 47(2), pp. 263-292..
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science, 211(4481), pp. 453-458.
Kannan, D., Jabbour, A., & Jabbour, C. (2014). Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company, European Journal of Operational Research 233, 432–447.
Kelemenis, A., Askounis, D. (2010). A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection, Expert Systems with Applications 37, 4999–5008.
Kracka, M., Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Ranking heating losses in a building by applying the MULTIMOORA. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 21(4), 352–359.
Lai, M. C., Sohn, H. S., Tseng, T. L., & Chiang, C. (2010). A hybrid algorithm for capacitated plant location problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 8599–8605.
Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2013a). Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment: I. Sensitivity to the parameter weights, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185, 2453–2461.
Li, P., Qian, H., Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2013b). Sensitivity analysis of TOPSIS method in water quality assessment II: Sensitivity to the index input data, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 185, 2463–2474.
Liu, C.H., Tzeng G.H, & Lee, M.H. (2013). Improving metro–airport connection service for tourism development: Using hybrid MCDM models, Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 95–107.
Liu, H.C., & Wu, J. (2013). Ping LiAssessment of health-care waste disposal methods using a VIKOR-based fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method, Waste Management, 33, 2744–2751.
Morteza, Y., & Farokh-Payam, A. (2015). A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS, Materials and Design, 65, 328–334.
Mulliner, E., Smallbone, K., & Maliene, V. (2013). An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method, Omega 41, 270–279.
Opricović, S., Tzeng, G.H. (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research. 156 (2), 445-455.
Ou, C.-W., & Chou, S.-Y. (2009). International distribution centre selection from a foreign market perspective using a weighted fuzzy factor rating system. Expert System with Applications, 36(2), 1773-1782.
Pamučar, D., & Ćirović G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison, Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016-3028.
Pavličić, D. (1997). Individual preferences and rational choice, Psychology, 1-2, 49-76.
Pavličić, D. (2002). Consistency of multi-attribute analysis method choice, Economic annals, 155, 59-82.
Peng Y., Kou G, Wang G, & Shi Y. (2011). FAMCDM: A fusion approach of MCDM methods to rank multiclass classification algorithms, Omega, 39, 677–689.
Rahmaniani, R., Saidi-Mehrabad, M., & Ashouri, H. (2013). Robust capacitated facility location problem optimization model and solution algorithms. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(1), 22–35.
Rahmaniani, R., Saidi-Mehrabad, M., & Ashouri, H. (2013). Robust capacitated facility location problem optimization model and solution algorithms. Journal of Uncertain Systems, 7(1), 22–35.
Rezaeiniya, N., Zolfani, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Greenhouse locating based on ANP-COPRAS-G methods - an empirical study based on Iran. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 16(2), 188–200.
Rodrigues F. L.J., Osiro, L., & Carpinetti L.C.R. (2014). A comparation between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection Applied Soft Computing, 21, 194–209.
Rogers M, Bruen M. (1998). Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE. European Journal of Operational Research, 107:542–51.
Shanian, A., Savadogo O. (2006). TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159(2): 1095-1104.
Stevens-Navarro, E., Martinez-Morales, J.D., & Pineda-Rico, U. (2012). Evaluation of Vertical Handoff Decision Algorightms Based on MADM Methods for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, Journal of Applied Research and Technology 10, 534–548.
Sun, M. (2012). A tabu search heuristic procedure for the capacitated facility location problem. Journal of Heuristics, 18(1), 91–118.
Triantaphyllou E. (2000): Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Triantaphyllou, E., & Lin, C-T. (1996). Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decision-making methods, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 14(4), 281-310.
Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S.H. (1989). An Examination of the Effectiveness of Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Methods: A Decision-Making Paradox, Decision Support Systems 5, 303-312.
Ustinovichius, L., Zavadskas, E. K., & Podvezko, V. (2007). Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction. Control and Cybernetics, 36(1): 251–268.
Viteikiene, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2007). Evaluating the sustainability of Vilnius city residential areas. Journal of civil engineering and management, 13(2): 149-155.
Wang, S., & Liu, P. (2007). The evaluation study on location selection of logistics centre based on fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS. International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 3779 – 3782.
Wang, X., & Triantaphyllou, E. (2008). Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 36, 45–63.
Wang, Y.L., & Tzeng, G.H. (2012). Brand marketing for creating brand value based on a MCDM model combining DEMATEL with ANP and VIKOR methods, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 5600–5615.
Yang, J.L., Chiu, HN, Tzeng G.H, & Yeh, R.H. (2008). Vendor selection by integrated fuzzy MCDM techniques with independent and interdependent relationships, Information Sciences, 178, 4166–4183.
Yu, O.-Y., Guikema, S.D., Briaud, J.-L., & Burnett, D. (2012). Sensitivity Analysis for Multi-Attribute System Selection Problems in Onshore Environmentally Friendly Drilling (EFD), Systems engineering 15(2), 153–171.
Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., & Nadizadeh, A. (2013). Using greedy clustering method to solve capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy demands. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 75–84.
Zare Mehrjerdi, Y., & Nadizadeh, A. (2013). Using greedy clustering method to solve capacitated location-routing problem with fuzzy demands. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 75–84.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.