Family practices during the pandemic and the state of emergency – the female perspective
Abstract
Increased risks are inspiring context for family practices’ analysis as they can impact changes in practices, thus changing family functioning and relations. The aim of the paper is to identify features of the main family practices (reproduction of everyday life, partnership, parenthood) during pandemic and state of emergency in Serbian society. It is assumed that these conditions led to practices’ changes. The issue is analysed based on data collected on a sample of 265 female respondents using a combined research plan. The results showed that the state of emergency and the pandemic of COVID-19 virus induced changes in main family practices. The most common were changes in the reproduction of everyday life (especially, groceries shopping), while pre-pandemic partnership practices were the most resistant to change. Traditional and egalitarian practices showed greater resilience to change, while masculine practices are usually newly established. There is continuity in the use of “female” resources in family practices, but with a shift from this pattern towards more frequent engagement of “male” resources, due to changes in the professional roles during the state of emergency.
References
Beck, U. (2001). Risk society. Belgrade: Filip Višnjić. [In Serbian]
Bilinović, A. (2013). The resource theory of “family and marital power”. Kultura Polisa 22 (10), 427–443. [In Serbian]
Blagojević Hjuson, M. (2013). Gender barometar in Serbia: development and everyday life. Belgrade: UN WOMEN – Agencija Ujedinjenih nacija za rodnu ravnopravnost i osnaživanje žena. Available at: http://images.edu.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/RODNI_BAROMETAR_U_SRBIJI_RAZVOJ_I_SVAKOD.pdf. [In Serbian]
Brom, C. Lukavsky, J. Greger, D. Hannemann, T. Straková, J. Švaříček, R. (2020). Mandatory Home Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown in the Czech Republic: A Rapid Survey of 1st–9th Graders’ Parents. Frontiers in Education, Vol. 5: 103. DOI.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00103.
Campbell, A. (2020). An increasing risk of family violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Forensic Science International: Reports. 2: 100089. DOI.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089.
Chambers, P, Graham, A, Phillipson, C, Ray, M. (2009). Family Practices in Later Life. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Cluver, L. Lachman, J. Sherr, L. Wessels, I. Krug, E. Rakotomalala, S. Blight, S. Hillis, S. Bachman, G. Green, O. Butchart, A. Tomlinson, M. Ward, C. Doubt, J. McDonald, K. (2020). Parenting in a time of COVID-19. The Lancet (London, England), 395(10231), e64. DOI.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4
COVID-19.rs (2020). Coronavirus COVID-19 Serbia Official website. Available at: https://covid19.rs/eng-instituteforpublichealth-updates/ [Accessed 25 July 2020] [In Serbian].
Creswell, J, Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publication.
Darling, N, Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin Vol. 113 (3), 487–496. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487.
Fisher, J. Languilaire, J-C. Lawthom, R. Nieuwenhuis, R. Petts, R. Runswick-Cole, K. Yerkes, M. (2020). Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19, Community, Work & Family, Vol. 23 (3), 247–252. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2020.1756568.
Gabb, J, Fink, J. (2018). Couple relationships in the 21st century – research, policy, practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan
ISTINOMER, (2020). Don’t lie, nobody said coronavirus is the funniest virus. [online] Available at: https://www.istinomer.rs/izjava/nemojte-da-lazete-niko-nije-rekao-da-je-korona-najsmesniji-virus/ [Accessed 25 July 2020] [In Serbian]
Jeynes, W. (2010). Parental involvement and academic success. New York, USA: Routledge.
Lopes, G. P. Vale, F.B.C. Vieira, I. Lopes da Silva Filho, A. Abuhid, C. Geber, S. (2020). COVID-19 and Sexuality: Reinventing Intimacy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, DOI.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01796-7.
Milić, A. (2001). Sociology of family – critics and challenges. Belgrade: Čigoja. [In Serbian]
Moen, P, Wethington, E. (1992). The Concept of Family Adaptive Strategies. Annual Review of Sociology 18, 233-251. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001313.
Morgan, D. (2011a). Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, D. (2011b) Locating ‘Family Practices’. Socioogical Research Online 16 (4), 174–182. Doi: 10.5153/sro.2535.
Republički zavod za statistiku (2017). Women and men in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: SORS. Available at: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2017/Pdf/G20176008.pdf [In Serbian]
Službeni glasnik RS (29/2020) Decision on declaring state of emergency. Belgrade. Available at: https://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/predsednik/odluka/2020/29/1/reg. [Accessed 26 July 2020]. [In Serbian]
Spagnola, M, Fiese, B. (2007). Family Routines and Rituals A Context for Development in the Lives of Young Children. Infants & Young Children Vol. 20 (4), 284–299. Doi: 10.1097/01.IYC.0000290352.32170.5a.
Spasić, I. (2004). Sociologies of everyday life. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Sproesser, G, Ruby, M, Arbit, N, Akotia, C, dos Santos Alvarenga, M, Bhangaokar, R, Furumitsu, I, Hu, X, Imada, S, Kaptan, G, Kaufer-Horwitz, M, Menon, U, Fischler, C, Rozin, P, Schupp, H, Renner, B. (2019). Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework. BMC Public Health Vol. 19, 1606. Doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7844-4.
Stanković, F, Markov, S. (2011). Rod i ekonomija. U: I. Milojević i S. Markov. Uvod u rodne teorije (321–335 str.). Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.
Tomanović, S, Stanojević, D. Ljubičić, M. (2016) Becoming a parent in Serbia – sociological research of transition into parenthood. Belgrade: University in Belgrade – Faculty of Philosophy. [In Serbian]