Porodične prakse u doba pandemije i vanrednog stanja – ženska perspektiva
Sažetak
Pojačani rizici inspirativan su kontekst za analizu porodičnih praksi, jer mogu da utiču na njihove promene, a time i na promene porodičnog funkcionisanja i odnosa. Cilj rada je da se utvrde obeležja osnovnih porodičnih praksi (reprodukcija svakodnevice, partnerstvo, roditeljstvo) u uslovima pandemije i vanrednog stanja u srpskom društvu. Pretpostavka je da su navedeni uslovi doveli do njihovih promena. Podaci za analizu prikupljeni su na uzorku od 265 ispitanica primenom kombinovanog istraživačkog plana. Rezultati su pokazali da su vanredno stanje i pandemija virusa COVID-19 uticali na promenu bazičnih porodičnih praksi. Najčešće su promene u reprodukciji svakodnevnog života (posebno, snabdevanja), dok su predpandemijske partnerske prakse najpostojanije. Veću rezilijentnost na promene pokazuju tradicionalne i egalitarne prakse, dok su maskuline prakse mahom novouspostavljene. Prisutan je kontinuitet u korišćenju „ženskih” resursa u porodičnim praksama, ali uz otklon od ovakog obrasca u pravcu češćeg angažovanja „muških” resursa, usled promene u obavljanju radnih uloga za vreme vanrednog stanja.
Reference
Beck, U. (2001). Risk society. Belgrade: Filip Višnjić. [In Serbian]
Bilinović, A. (2013). The resource theory of “family and marital power”. Kultura Polisa 22 (10), 427–443. [In Serbian]
Blagojević Hjuson, M. (2013). Gender barometar in Serbia: development and everyday life. Belgrade: UN WOMEN – Agencija Ujedinjenih nacija za rodnu ravnopravnost i osnaživanje žena. Available at: http://images.edu.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/RODNI_BAROMETAR_U_SRBIJI_RAZVOJ_I_SVAKOD.pdf. [In Serbian]
Brom, C. Lukavsky, J. Greger, D. Hannemann, T. Straková, J. Švaříček, R. (2020). Mandatory Home Education during the COVID-19 Lockdown in the Czech Republic: A Rapid Survey of 1st–9th Graders’ Parents. Frontiers in Education, Vol. 5: 103. DOI.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00103.
Campbell, A. (2020). An increasing risk of family violence during the COVID-19 pandemic: Strengthening community collaborations to save lives. Forensic Science International: Reports. 2: 100089. DOI.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100089.
Chambers, P, Graham, A, Phillipson, C, Ray, M. (2009). Family Practices in Later Life. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
Cluver, L. Lachman, J. Sherr, L. Wessels, I. Krug, E. Rakotomalala, S. Blight, S. Hillis, S. Bachman, G. Green, O. Butchart, A. Tomlinson, M. Ward, C. Doubt, J. McDonald, K. (2020). Parenting in a time of COVID-19. The Lancet (London, England), 395(10231), e64. DOI.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4
COVID-19.rs (2020). Coronavirus COVID-19 Serbia Official website. Available at: https://covid19.rs/eng-instituteforpublichealth-updates/ [Accessed 25 July 2020] [In Serbian].
Creswell, J, Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publication.
Darling, N, Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin Vol. 113 (3), 487–496. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487.
Fisher, J. Languilaire, J-C. Lawthom, R. Nieuwenhuis, R. Petts, R. Runswick-Cole, K. Yerkes, M. (2020). Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19, Community, Work & Family, Vol. 23 (3), 247–252. DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2020.1756568.
Gabb, J, Fink, J. (2018). Couple relationships in the 21st century – research, policy, practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan
ISTINOMER, (2020). Don’t lie, nobody said coronavirus is the funniest virus. [online] Available at: https://www.istinomer.rs/izjava/nemojte-da-lazete-niko-nije-rekao-da-je-korona-najsmesniji-virus/ [Accessed 25 July 2020] [In Serbian]
Jeynes, W. (2010). Parental involvement and academic success. New York, USA: Routledge.
Lopes, G. P. Vale, F.B.C. Vieira, I. Lopes da Silva Filho, A. Abuhid, C. Geber, S. (2020). COVID-19 and Sexuality: Reinventing Intimacy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, DOI.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01796-7.
Milić, A. (2001). Sociology of family – critics and challenges. Belgrade: Čigoja. [In Serbian]
Moen, P, Wethington, E. (1992). The Concept of Family Adaptive Strategies. Annual Review of Sociology 18, 233-251. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001313.
Morgan, D. (2011a). Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morgan, D. (2011b) Locating ‘Family Practices’. Socioogical Research Online 16 (4), 174–182. Doi: 10.5153/sro.2535.
Republički zavod za statistiku (2017). Women and men in the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade: SORS. Available at: https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2017/Pdf/G20176008.pdf [In Serbian]
Službeni glasnik RS (29/2020) Decision on declaring state of emergency. Belgrade. Available at: https://www.pravno-informacioni-sistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/predsednik/odluka/2020/29/1/reg. [Accessed 26 July 2020]. [In Serbian]
Spagnola, M, Fiese, B. (2007). Family Routines and Rituals A Context for Development in the Lives of Young Children. Infants & Young Children Vol. 20 (4), 284–299. Doi: 10.1097/01.IYC.0000290352.32170.5a.
Spasić, I. (2004). Sociologies of everyday life. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva. [In Serbian]
Sproesser, G, Ruby, M, Arbit, N, Akotia, C, dos Santos Alvarenga, M, Bhangaokar, R, Furumitsu, I, Hu, X, Imada, S, Kaptan, G, Kaufer-Horwitz, M, Menon, U, Fischler, C, Rozin, P, Schupp, H, Renner, B. (2019). Understanding traditional and modern eating: the TEP10 framework. BMC Public Health Vol. 19, 1606. Doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7844-4.
Stanković, F, Markov, S. (2011). Rod i ekonomija. U: I. Milojević i S. Markov. Uvod u rodne teorije (321–335 str.). Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.
Tomanović, S, Stanojević, D. Ljubičić, M. (2016) Becoming a parent in Serbia – sociological research of transition into parenthood. Belgrade: University in Belgrade – Faculty of Philosophy. [In Serbian]