Social after pandemic distortion: towards thinking in planetary terms

  • Stefan S. Janković University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Institute for Sociological Research, Belgrade (Serbia)
Keywords: pandemic, planetary thinking, speculation

Abstract


Along with climate change, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a specific planetary event, with surprising effects that require a rethinking of the social. The paper starts from the thesis that the pandemic essentially undermines modernity and the institutions of sovereignty, geopolitics and political economy due to their essential separation from non-human things. In the second part of the paper four propositions for a better understanding of planetary events are offered, including removing the difference of parts/wholes, non-relational thinking, rejecting the difference between global and local, and understanding collectives as constantly made in a continuum of humans and non-humas. Finally, the importance of speculation as the basis of planetary thinking is considered. There is a need to revise scientific practice and enhance its sensitivity to recognizing heterogeneous attachments of humans and non-humans in planetary settings.

References

Abbott, A. (2018). Varieties of Normative Inquiry - Moral Alternatives to Politicization in Sociology. The American Sociologist. Volume 49, 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-9367-8

Agnew, J. (1995). The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. In J. Agnew, S. Corbridge (eds.) Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international political economy, 78–100. London: Routledge.

Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of Power: Beyond Territory and Networks. London: Routledge.

Amin, A. (1997). Placing globalisation. Theory, Culture and Society, Volume 14, 123–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014002011

Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, volume 34, issue 3 (2002), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3439

Amin, A., Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing Like a City. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Archer, M. (2010) Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism. Sociological Theory, Volume 28 issue 3, 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x

Arènes, A., Latour, B., Gaillardet, J. (2018) Giving depth to the surface: An exercise in the Gaia-graphy of critical zones. The Anthropocene Review, Vol 5, Issue 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618782257

Asher, K., Wainwright, J. (2018) After Post‐Development: On Capitalism, Difference, and Representation. Antipode, Volume 51, Issue 1, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12430

Atkinson, D., Dodds, K. (2003) Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of a Geopolitical Thought. London and New York: Routledge.

Bennet, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Besbris, M., Khan, S. (2017) Less Theory. More Description. Sociological Theory, Volume 35, issue 2, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709776

Blok, A. (2013). Pragmatic sociology as political ecology: On the many worths of nature(s). European Journal of Social Theory, 16 (4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013479688

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E. Vos, J., Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective. Water International, volume 41, issue 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898

Boltanski, L., Thevénot, L. (2006) On Justification. The Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M. and MacLeod G. (2002) Introduction: State space in question. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones and G. MacLeod (eds.) State/space: a reader, 1–26. Wiley-Blackwell

Brunn, J., Medby, I. (2014). Theorising the Thaw: Geopolitics in a Changing Arctic. Geography Compass 8/12, 915–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12189

Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. and Graham H. (2011) Towards a Speculative Philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek. and H. Graham (eds.) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, 1–18. Melbourne: Re.Press

Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Charbonnier, P. Salmon, G., Skafish, P. (2016) Introduction. In P. Charbonnier, G. Salmon, P. Skafish (eds.). Comparative Metaphysics. Ontology After Anthropology. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35.2 (2009). str. 197–222.

Chakrabarty, D. (2019). The Planet: An Emergent Humanist Category. Critical Inquiry 46, no. 1 (Autumn 2019): 1–31.

Crownshaw, T., Morgan, C., Adams, A., Sers, M., Britto dos Santos, N., Damiano, A., Gilbert, L., Yahya Haage, G., Horen Greenford, D. (2018). Over the horizon: Exploring the conditions of a post-growth world. The Anthropocene Review. Vol 6, Issue 1–2, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618820350

Danowski, D. and Viveiros de Castro, E. (2016). The End of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Delanty, G. and Mota, A. (2017). Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 2017, Vol. 20 (1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535

Depletau, F. (2018). Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance. In F. Depletau (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.

Descola, P. (2013a). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Descola, P. (2013b). Ecology of Others. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Dreyfus, H. and Taylor, C. (2015) Retrieving Realism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point : globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world., Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (1), 8–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00148.x

Elden, S. (2017). Legal terrain: the political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law, 5 (2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrx008

Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Carlton.

Ermakoff, I. (2017). Shadow Plays – Theory’s Perennial Challenges. Sociological Theory. Volume 35, issue 2, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709774

Harman, G. (2011). On the Undermining of Objects: Grant, Bruno, and Radical Philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek. and H. Graham (eds.) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, 21–40. Melbourne: Re.Press. Available at: https://www.re-press.org/book-files/OA_Version_Speculative_Turn_9780980668346.pdf

Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Horigan, S. (1988). Nature and Culture in Western Discourses. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A Brief History. London and New York: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London and New York: Routledge.

Kallis, G., March, H. (2015). Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Volume 105, Issue 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.973803

Kidner, D. (2012). Nature and Experience in the Culture of Delusion: How Industrial Society Lost Touch with Reality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lane, R. (2019) The American Anthropocene: Economic scarcity and growth during the great acceleration. Geoforum. Volume 99 (2019) 11–21

Larregue, J. (2018) Against Sociology à la Gorgias: Evidence Is the Measure of all Scientific Arguments. The American Sociologist. Volume 49: 344–347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9376-2

Latour, B. (2017) Why Gaia is not a God of Totality. Theory, Culture & Society. 34 (2–3), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416652700

Latour, B. (2017a). What’s the body of the Body Politic? – Sovereignty, Identity, Ecology. A San Giorgio Dialog at the invitation of the Cini Foundation, in Venice, 12th–15th of September 2017. Available at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/CINI-2017.pdf

Latour, B. (2017b). Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Latour, B., Lenton, T. (2019). Extending the Domain of Freedom, or Why Gaia Is So Hard to Understand. Critical Inquiry 45, no. 3 (Spring), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1086/702611

Lock, M, Palsson, G. (2016). Can Science Resolve the Nature-Nurture Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kilminster, R. (2011). Norbert Elias’s post-philosophical sociology- from ‘critique’ to relative detachment.

The Sociological Review, Vol 59, Issue 1_suppl. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01980.x

Macleod, G. (2014). Urban and Regional Horizons, Regional Studies, 48 (4), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.903717

Maffesoli, M. (2020). Sanitary Crisis, Civilizational Crisis. Space and Culture. Vol 23, Issue 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220938617

Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and NationStates, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mann, J. Wainwright. G. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso

Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (4) new series, 416–432.

Moore, J. (2016). Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. In J. Moore (ed) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: Kairos.

Mol, A., Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An Introduction. In A. Mol, J. Law (eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledgde Practices. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Morris, D. (2019). A human tragedy? The pace of negative global change exceeds human progress. The Anthropocene Review. 2019, Vol. 6 (1–2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619848216

Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology. For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.

O’Donnell, T. (2019). Don’t Get Too Attached: Property-Place Relations on Contested Coastlines. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (3), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12368

Osaka, S., Bellamy, R. (2020). Weather in the Anthropocene: Extreme event attribution and a modelled nature–culture divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Online issue: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12390

Reichel, A., Perey, R. (2018). Moving beyond growth in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review. Vol 5, Issue 3, 2018, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618799104

Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sarmiento, E., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. (2019). Biopolitics, discipline, and hydro‐citizenship: Drought management and water governance in England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Volume 44, Issue2, 361-375. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12288

Savransky, M. (2016). The Adventure of Relevance. An Ethics of Social Inquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Savransky, M. Wilkie, A., Rosengarten, A. (2017). The lure of possible futures: on speculative research. Speculative Research The Lure of Possible Futures. Wilkie, A., Savransky, M. Rosengarten, A. (eds.). London and New York: Routledge.

Schmitt, C. (2006). The Nomos of the Earth. New York: Telos Publishing.

Shields, R. (2013). Spatial Questions: Cultural Topologies and Social Spatialisations. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Shields, R. Schillmeier, M., Lloyd, J., Van Loon, J. (2020). 6 Feet Apart: Spaces and Cultures of Quarantine. Space and Culture. Vol 23, Issue 3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220938622.

Skafish, P. (2016). The Metaphysics of Extra-Moderns: On the Decolonization of Thought – A Conversation with Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Common Knowledge, volume 22, issue 3, 393–414. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/629241.

Smith, N. (2009). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press

Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.

Stengers, I. (2017). Autonomy and the Intrusion of Gaia. South Atlantic Quarterly, Volume 116, issue 2, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3829467

Stott, C., West, O. ,Harrison, M. (2020) A Turning Point, Securitization, and Policing in the Context of Covid-19: Building a New Social Contract Between State and Nation? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, paaa021, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa021

Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, volume 42, issue 11, 1991-2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869

Szerszynski, B. (2005). Nature, Technology and the Sacred. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Szerszynski, B. (2016). Planetary mobilities: movement, memory and emergence in the body of the Earth, Mobilities 11 (4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211828

Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with theworld. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, E. von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 64–83. London and New York: Routledge.

Thévenot, L. (2002). Which Road to Follow? The Moral Complexity of an ‘‘Equipped’’ Humanity. In A. Mol, J. Law. (eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledgde Practices. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Thévenot, L. (2009). Biomedical Conventions and Regulatory Objectivity. Social Studies of Science, Volume 39, issue 5, 2009, 793–813.

Thrift., N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, Volume 86 B (1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x

Thrift, N. (2015). The weight of the world. The Journal of Space Synta, volume 6, issue: 1, 102–103.

Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital and European States: A.D. 900–1990. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

van der Ploeg, J. D. (2009). The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London: Earthscan.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (2015). Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, Volume 33, Issue 1, 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102

Wallerstein, I. (2006). European Universalism. The Rhetoric of Power. New York, London: The New Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol 1 & 2. Los Angelos, London: University of California Press, Berkley.

Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London, Sage Publications.

Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of Nature. In R. Williams (ed) Problems in Materialism and Culture, 67–85. London: Verso.

Published
2020/10/04
Section
Review scientific paper