Društveno nakon pandemijske distorzije: ka mišljenju u planetarnim okvirima

  • Stefan S. Janković Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Beograd (Srbija)
Ključne reči: pandemija, planetarno, spekulativnost

Sažetak


 

Zajedno sa klimatskim promenama, pandemija COVID-19 predstavlja specifičan planetarni događaj, sa iznenađujućim efektima koji zahtevaju ponovno promišljanje društvenog. U radu se polazi od teze da pandemija suštinski podriva modernost i institucije suverenosti, geopolitike i političke ekonomije usled njihovog suštinskog razdvajanja od ne-ljudskih stvari. Potom, u drugom delu rada se nude četiri propozicije za bolje razumevanje planetarnih događaja, među kojima su uklanjanje razlike delova/celine, ne-relaciono mišljenje, odbijanje razlike između globalnog i lokalnog i shvatanje kolektiva kao stalno pravljenih u kontinuumu ljudi i ne-ljudi. Na kraju, razmatra se značaj spekulativnosti kao osnova planetarnog mišljenja. Uviđa se potreba za revizijom naučne prakse i pospešivanja njene senzibilnosti za uviđanje heterogenih vezivanja ljudi i ne-ljudi u planetarnim okvirima.

Reference

Abbott, A. (2018). Varieties of Normative Inquiry - Moral Alternatives to Politicization in Sociology. The American Sociologist. Volume 49, 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-017-9367-8

Agnew, J. (1995). The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. In J. Agnew, S. Corbridge (eds.) Mastering space: hegemony, territory and international political economy, 78–100. London: Routledge.

Allen, J. (2016). Topologies of Power: Beyond Territory and Networks. London: Routledge.

Amin, A. (1997). Placing globalisation. Theory, Culture and Society, Volume 14, 123–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014002011

Amin, A. (2002). Spatialities of globalization. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, volume 34, issue 3 (2002), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3439

Amin, A., Thrift, N. (2017). Seeing Like a City. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Archer, M. (2010) Routine, Reflexivity, and Realism. Sociological Theory, Volume 28 issue 3, 272–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01375.x

Arènes, A., Latour, B., Gaillardet, J. (2018) Giving depth to the surface: An exercise in the Gaia-graphy of critical zones. The Anthropocene Review, Vol 5, Issue 2, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618782257

Asher, K., Wainwright, J. (2018) After Post‐Development: On Capitalism, Difference, and Representation. Antipode, Volume 51, Issue 1, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12430

Atkinson, D., Dodds, K. (2003) Geopolitical Traditions: A Century of a Geopolitical Thought. London and New York: Routledge.

Bennet, J. (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Besbris, M., Khan, S. (2017) Less Theory. More Description. Sociological Theory, Volume 35, issue 2, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709776

Blok, A. (2013). Pragmatic sociology as political ecology: On the many worths of nature(s). European Journal of Social Theory, 16 (4), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013479688

Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E. Vos, J., Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective. Water International, volume 41, issue 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898

Boltanski, L., Thevénot, L. (2006) On Justification. The Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique. A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M. and MacLeod G. (2002) Introduction: State space in question. In N. Brenner, B. Jessop, M. Jones and G. MacLeod (eds.) State/space: a reader, 1–26. Wiley-Blackwell

Brunn, J., Medby, I. (2014). Theorising the Thaw: Geopolitics in a Changing Arctic. Geography Compass 8/12, 915–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12189

Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. and Graham H. (2011) Towards a Speculative Philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek. and H. Graham (eds.) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, 1–18. Melbourne: Re.Press

Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography: An Ontology of Machines and Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Charbonnier, P. Salmon, G., Skafish, P. (2016) Introduction. In P. Charbonnier, G. Salmon, P. Skafish (eds.). Comparative Metaphysics. Ontology After Anthropology. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35.2 (2009). str. 197–222.

Chakrabarty, D. (2019). The Planet: An Emergent Humanist Category. Critical Inquiry 46, no. 1 (Autumn 2019): 1–31.

Crownshaw, T., Morgan, C., Adams, A., Sers, M., Britto dos Santos, N., Damiano, A., Gilbert, L., Yahya Haage, G., Horen Greenford, D. (2018). Over the horizon: Exploring the conditions of a post-growth world. The Anthropocene Review. Vol 6, Issue 1–2, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618820350

Danowski, D. and Viveiros de Castro, E. (2016). The End of the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Delanty, G. and Mota, A. (2017). Governing the Anthropocene: Agency, Governance, Knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 2017, Vol. 20 (1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016668535

Depletau, F. (2018). Relational Thinking in Sociology: Relevance, Concurrence and Dissonance. In F. Depletau (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. London: Palgrave-MacMillan.

Descola, P. (2013a). Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Descola, P. (2013b). Ecology of Others. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Dreyfus, H. and Taylor, C. (2015) Retrieving Realism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Elden, S. (2005). Missing the point : globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world., Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (1), 8–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00148.x

Elden, S. (2017). Legal terrain: the political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law, 5 (2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrx008

Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Carlton.

Ermakoff, I. (2017). Shadow Plays – Theory’s Perennial Challenges. Sociological Theory. Volume 35, issue 2, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275117709774

Harman, G. (2011). On the Undermining of Objects: Grant, Bruno, and Radical Philosophy. In L. Bryant, N. Srnicek. and H. Graham (eds.) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism, 21–40. Melbourne: Re.Press. Available at: https://www.re-press.org/book-files/OA_Version_Speculative_Turn_9780980668346.pdf

Harman, G. (2016). Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Horigan, S. (1988). Nature and Culture in Western Discourses. London: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A Brief History. London and New York: Routledge.

Ingold, T. (2011). Being Alive. Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London and New York: Routledge.

Kallis, G., March, H. (2015). Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Volume 105, Issue 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.973803

Kidner, D. (2012). Nature and Experience in the Culture of Delusion: How Industrial Society Lost Touch with Reality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lane, R. (2019) The American Anthropocene: Economic scarcity and growth during the great acceleration. Geoforum. Volume 99 (2019) 11–21

Larregue, J. (2018) Against Sociology à la Gorgias: Evidence Is the Measure of all Scientific Arguments. The American Sociologist. Volume 49: 344–347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-018-9376-2

Latour, B. (2017) Why Gaia is not a God of Totality. Theory, Culture & Society. 34 (2–3), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416652700

Latour, B. (2017a). What’s the body of the Body Politic? – Sovereignty, Identity, Ecology. A San Giorgio Dialog at the invitation of the Cini Foundation, in Venice, 12th–15th of September 2017. Available at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/CINI-2017.pdf

Latour, B. (2017b). Facing Gaia. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Latour, B. (2018). Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Latour, B., Lenton, T. (2019). Extending the Domain of Freedom, or Why Gaia Is So Hard to Understand. Critical Inquiry 45, no. 3 (Spring), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1086/702611

Lock, M, Palsson, G. (2016). Can Science Resolve the Nature-Nurture Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Kilminster, R. (2011). Norbert Elias’s post-philosophical sociology- from ‘critique’ to relative detachment.

The Sociological Review, Vol 59, Issue 1_suppl. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.01980.x

Macleod, G. (2014). Urban and Regional Horizons, Regional Studies, 48 (4), 583–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.903717

Maffesoli, M. (2020). Sanitary Crisis, Civilizational Crisis. Space and Culture. Vol 23, Issue 3, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220938617

Mann, M. (1993). The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2, The Rise of Classes and NationStates, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mann, J. Wainwright. G. (2018). Climate Leviathan: A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London: Verso

Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30 (4) new series, 416–432.

Moore, J. (2016). Introduction: Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. In J. Moore (ed) Anthropocene or Capitalocene? Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism. Oakland: Kairos.

Mol, A., Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An Introduction. In A. Mol, J. Law (eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledgde Practices. Duke University Press. Durham and London.

Morris, D. (2019). A human tragedy? The pace of negative global change exceeds human progress. The Anthropocene Review. 2019, Vol. 6 (1–2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619848216

Morton, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Morton, T. (2016). Dark Ecology. For a Logic of Future Coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.

O’Donnell, T. (2019). Don’t Get Too Attached: Property-Place Relations on Contested Coastlines. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45 (3), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12368

Osaka, S., Bellamy, R. (2020). Weather in the Anthropocene: Extreme event attribution and a modelled nature–culture divide. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Online issue: https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12390

Reichel, A., Perey, R. (2018). Moving beyond growth in the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review. Vol 5, Issue 3, 2018, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019618799104

Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sarmiento, E., Landström, C., Whatmore, S. (2019). Biopolitics, discipline, and hydro‐citizenship: Drought management and water governance in England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. Volume 44, Issue2, 361-375. DOI: 10.1111/tran.12288

Savransky, M. (2016). The Adventure of Relevance. An Ethics of Social Inquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Savransky, M. Wilkie, A., Rosengarten, A. (2017). The lure of possible futures: on speculative research. Speculative Research The Lure of Possible Futures. Wilkie, A., Savransky, M. Rosengarten, A. (eds.). London and New York: Routledge.

Schmitt, C. (2006). The Nomos of the Earth. New York: Telos Publishing.

Shields, R. (2013). Spatial Questions: Cultural Topologies and Social Spatialisations. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Shields, R. Schillmeier, M., Lloyd, J., Van Loon, J. (2020). 6 Feet Apart: Spaces and Cultures of Quarantine. Space and Culture. Vol 23, Issue 3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331220938622.

Skafish, P. (2016). The Metaphysics of Extra-Moderns: On the Decolonization of Thought – A Conversation with Eduardo Viveiros de Castro. Common Knowledge, volume 22, issue 3, 393–414. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/629241.

Smith, N. (2009). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. Athens and London: The University of Georgia Press

Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.

Stengers, I. (2017). Autonomy and the Intrusion of Gaia. South Atlantic Quarterly, Volume 116, issue 2, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-3829467

Stott, C., West, O. ,Harrison, M. (2020) A Turning Point, Securitization, and Policing in the Context of Covid-19: Building a New Social Contract Between State and Nation? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, paaa021, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paaa021

Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, volume 42, issue 11, 1991-2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869

Szerszynski, B. (2005). Nature, Technology and the Sacred. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Szerszynski, B. (2016). Planetary mobilities: movement, memory and emergence in the body of the Earth, Mobilities 11 (4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1211828

Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with theworld. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, E. von Savigny (eds) The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, 64–83. London and New York: Routledge.

Thévenot, L. (2002). Which Road to Follow? The Moral Complexity of an ‘‘Equipped’’ Humanity. In A. Mol, J. Law. (eds) Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledgde Practices. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Thévenot, L. (2009). Biomedical Conventions and Regulatory Objectivity. Social Studies of Science, Volume 39, issue 5, 2009, 793–813.

Thrift., N. (2004). Intensities of feeling: Towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler, Volume 86 B (1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00154.x

Thrift, N. (2015). The weight of the world. The Journal of Space Synta, volume 6, issue: 1, 102–103.

Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital and European States: A.D. 900–1990. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

van der Ploeg, J. D. (2009). The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London: Earthscan.

Viveiros de Castro, E. (2015). Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? Some comments on an ongoing anthropological debate. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, Volume 33, Issue 1, 2–17. https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102

Wallerstein, I. (2006). European Universalism. The Rhetoric of Power. New York, London: The New Press.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Vol 1 & 2. Los Angelos, London: University of California Press, Berkley.

Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. London, Sage Publications.

Williams, R. (1980). Ideas of Nature. In R. Williams (ed) Problems in Materialism and Culture, 67–85. London: Verso.

Objavljeno
2020/10/04
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Pregledni naučni rad