Trust and Subjective Well-Being in Serbia during the Pandemic: Research Results
Abstract
The context of a pandemic caused by an infectious agent and the resulting health risk to a large number of people is a new type of risk contemporary humans are not quite familiar with. In addition to forcing citizens to rely on the effects of controlled medical and epidemiological measures, this kind of situation steers citizens towards cooperation and solidarity as well as towards personal capabilities of functioning during a crisis and it requires a certain degree of trust, not only in the institutions but also in other persons. The aim of this paper is to learn to what degree Serbian citizens trust others during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether this level of generalized trust differs among different sociodemographic groups, or more precisely, which groups were affected the most by the absence of generalized trust. The paper also analyzes a set of variables which are either a part of the concept of subjective well-being (feeling of happiness and life satisfaction) or are closely connected to it (the feeling of control over life, subjective health assessment, and assessments of solidarity and honesty of others). The analyzed data were obtained from a sample of 602 adult Serbian citizens who participated in an online survey in May 2020 by completing a questionnaire they received via e-mail and social networks from multiple access points. These data are compared to the newest available data on the given indicators in Serbia before the pandemic, collected within the European Values Study (EVS) in 2017 and the European Social Survey (ESS) in 2018. The results indicate a significant decrease in happiness and continuously low levels of the feeling of control over life and life satisfaction, but also an increase in the assessed honesty and solidarity of others. These findings are in accordance with the results of the previous studies, which revealed different dominant aspects in the analyzed concepts, leading to their different flexibility and (non)resilience to the changes in society.
References
Bălțătescu (Baltatescu), S. (2009). Differential Effects of Interpersonal and Political Trust on Happiness and Life Satisfaction (May 5, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1952595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1952595
Barbalet, J.M. (1996). Social emotions: confidence, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 16 (9/10), 75–96.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
Delhey, J., Newton, K. & Welzel, C. (2011). How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem. American Sociological Review 76 (5), 786–807. DOI: 10.1177/0003122411420817
DeNeve, J-E., Diener, E., Tay, L., & Xuereb, C. (2013). The objective benefits of subjective well-being. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2013. Volume 2. (pp. 54–79). New York: UN Sustainable Network Development Solutions Network. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1236.pdf
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7 (4), 397–404.
Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 25–41.
Djankov, S., Nikolova, E. & Zilinsky, J. (2016). The happiness gap in Eastern Europe. Journal of Comparative Economics 44 (1), 108–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.006.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtue and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78 (6), 1360–1380.
Gundelach, P., Kreiner, S. (2004). Happiness and Life Satisfaction in Advanced European Countries, Cross-Cultural Research, 38 (4), 359–386. DOI: n10.1177/1069397104267483
Haller, M., & Hadler, M. (2006). How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 169-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-6297-y
Hardin, R. (2006). Trust: Key Concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Helliwell, J. F., Wang, S. (2013). World happiness: trends, explanations and distribution. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, and J. Sachs (Ed). World happiness report 2013. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Helliwell, J. F., Wang, S. (2013). World happiness: trends, explanations and distribution. In Helliwell, John F., Richard Layard, and Jeffrey Sachs (eds). World Happiness Report 2013, 8-37. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2013/
Jugureanu, A. (2016). A short introduction to happiness in social sciences. Belvedere Meridionale 28 (1), 55–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2016.1.4
Kuroki, M. (20119). Does social trust increase individual happiness in Japan? The Japanese Economic Review, 62 (4), 444–458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2011.00533.x https://www.academia.edu/30450908/Does_Social_Trust_Increase_Individual_Happiness_in_Japan_
Lewis, J. D. & Weigertt, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces 63 (4), 967–985.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics 28 (4), 664–683.
Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sander, T.H. & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Still Bowling Alone? The Post-9/11 Split. Journal of Democracy 21 (1), 9–16.
Simmel, G. (2004). The Philosophy of Money. London, Routledge.
Stanojević, D., & Stokanić, D. [2014]. Between Sicilia and Lombardy: Relation between trust, civil norms and social participation among citizens of Serbia. Sociologija, 56(2), 181–200. DOI: 10.2298/SOC1402181S [In Serbian]
Sztompka, P. (2000). Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In Sullivan, B.A., Snyder, M., and Sullivan, J.L. (Eds.), Cooperation: The political psychology of effective human interaction, pp. 323–342. Malden, MA: Blackwell. http://www.mysmu.edu/faculty/williamtov/pubs/2008_TovDiener.pdf
Uslaner, E.M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
Veenhoven, R. (2001). Item Bank-Introductory Text. World Database of Happiness. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Veenhoven, R. (2008). Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In Michael Eid & Randy Larsen (Eds), The Science of Subjective Well-being: A tribute to Ed Diener, pp. 44–61. New York: Guilford Publications.
Verme, P. (2009). Happiness, freedom and control. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71, 146–161.
Подаци:
SORS (2019). Labor Force Survey. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.
European Social Survey Round 9 Data (2018). Data file edition 2.0. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC. doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS9-2018. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/data/download.html?r=9
European Values Study 2017: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2017). Gedeshi, Ilir; Kritzinger, Sylvia; Poghosyan, Gevorg. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA7500 Data file Version 3.0.0, https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13511