The process of weakening of nation-state in the era of neo-liberalism and the crisis of democracy

  • Svetlana D. Stamenova Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Sofia (Bulgaria)
Keywords: neo-liberalism, nation-state, national identity, democracy, civil society

Abstract


The article aims to show that as a result of globalization and neo-liberal form of governance and ideology, the state was weakened through a complex system of economic, financial, technological and social relations on a global scale. The withdrawal of the state from regulative functions on its territory is a refusal of the state for ideological mobilization of its populace based on nationalism and national identity. During the decline of national identity, the national state moves its role from imposing of cultural and national homogeneity, a characteristic of the earlier stage of nation-state building, to supporting cultural diversity. Crisis of democracy and emergence of post-democracy are considered and the question about possibility of having democracy beyond the nation-state borders.

References

Bauman, Z. (1999). The Glocalization. Sofia: Lik [In Bulgarian]

Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity. Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. London: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P. (2002). Against the policy of depoliticization. Studies in Political Economy, (69), 31–41. doi:10.1080/19187033.2002.11675179

Cohen, R. (1997). Global diasporas: an introduction. London and Seattle: UCL Press and Washington Press.

Crouch, C. (2004). Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies, New York: Oxford University Press.

Dore, R. (2000). Stock Market Capitalism: Welfare Capitalism: Japan and Germany versus the Anglo-Saxons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fenton, C. S. (2008). The semi-detached nation: post-nationalism and Britain. Cycnos, Vol. 25, No. 2. Available at: http://revel.unice.fr/cycnos/?id=6197

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publisher.

Gulalp, H. (2013). Citizenship and democracy beyond the nation-state?, Cultural Dynamics, 25(I), 29–47. doi.org/10.1177/0921374013489448

Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1995). Globalization and the future of nation-state. Economy and Society, (24:3), 408–442. doi.org/10.1080/03085149500000017

Khazin M. (2019). The catcher in the lie, or truth about Bretton Woods model. Available at: https://aurora.network/forum/topic/71971-t-e-at-er-in-t-e-lie-or-trut-about-brettonoods-model

Marquand, D. (2004). Decline of the public: The hollowing out of citizenship. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Mittelman, J. (ed.) (1996). Globalization: Critical Reflection. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reiner.

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficits: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norris, P. (1999). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pharr, S., Putnam, R. and Dalton, R. J. (2000). A Quarter-century of Declining Confidence. Journal of Democracy, (11: 2), 5–25

Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spencer, P. and Wollman, H. (2002). Nationalism: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage Publications.

Swyngedouw, E. (2000). Authoritarian governance, power and the politics of rescaling. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, (18), 63–76. doi:101068/d9s

Turner, B. S. (2000). Liberal citizenship and cosmopolitan virtue. In: Vandenberg A. (ed.) Citizenship and Social Theory (pp. 162–190). London: SAGE.

Wilmsen E. N. and McAllister, P. (1996). The Politics of Difference: Ethnic Premises and a World of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wood, E. M. (1995). Democracy against Capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2021/04/10
Section
Review scientific paper