Experiences with domestic violence pertetrators in Serbia: from practitioner’s view point
Abstract
This paper deals with research into organisational difficulty and ethical dilemmas, as well as the efficiency of group therapy of men who were sent to group therapy treatments due to intimate partner relationship violence. This type of intervention has recently been recognised in Serbia as an important factor in the protection against domestic violence. Nevertheless, its use has remained sporadic and in order to be able to understand reasons for this, we have found helpful an analysis of the social context, but also the views of experts and the general public regarding domestic violence in our country. The public and experts alike have a firm position in terms of treating domestic violence perpetrators: batterers are almost as a rule male. The research question as the focal point of further analysis was the following: Whether or in which way such a discourse affects the work of practitioners and personal development of the clients - participants in group therapy? To obtain the answer, we have conducted an in-depth interview with one of practitioners in the Belgrade Marriage and Family Counselling Centre, who has been in charge of this programme since it was first launched (2012). As it turns out, both the practitioners and the clients are faced with multiple challenges. The practitioners are faced with their efforts being ignored by experts (by fellow practitioners and prosecutors and judges alike), the absence of systemic support and institutional networking, as well as with professional burnout. The clients often see themselves as victims of the system; they are the subject of a socially imposed ideological reshaping and, therefore, not infrequently they demonstrate resistance to efforts aimed at achieving their personal change and so they leave the programme before it is actually completed. Bearing in mind such outcomes, we believe that it is necessary to work on a change of the prevalent discourse relative to violence and possible ways of preventing violence, on recognising the significance of group therapy of batterers as a potentially important alternative route in working with victims and perpetrators of domestic violence and, finally, on initiating an interdisciplinary discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of sociotherapy treatment.
References
Akoensi, D. T., Koehler, A. J., Lösel, F., Humphreys, K. D. (2012). Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs in Europe, Part II: A Systematic Review of the State of Evidence. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 57(10), 1206–1225.
Andrić, S., Milašinović, S. (2018). Violence against women in the family. Sociološki pregled, LII(3), 869–885. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg52-16351
Barocas, B., Emery, D., Mills, G. L. (2016). Changing the Domestic Violence Narrative: Aligning Definitions and Standards. Journal of Family Violence, 31(8), 941–947.
Brown, J., James, K. (2014). Therapeutic Responses to Domestic Violence. In Australia: A History of Controversies, Australian and New Zealand journal of family therapy, 35(2), 169–184.
Čvorović, D., Otašević, B., Vranešević, M. (2021). Multi-sectorial cooperation in cases of domestic violence from the point of view of social work centre. Sociološki pregled, LV(3), 1149–1164. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg55-32012
Dalton, B. (2001). Batterer characteristics and treatment completion. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(12), 1223−1238.
Despotović, V. (2017). Psychosocial Programme for Batterers in Intimate Partner Relationships in Serbia. In: Mitić Lazarević, M. Škugor, S. (eds.), Psychosocial Treatment of Domestic Violence Perpetrators as a Ticket to Permanent Change (26–36). Beograd: IAN. [In Serbian]
Dimovski, D., Kostić, M. (2015). Psycho-social treatment of domestic abusers as a form of prevention of domestic violence. Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo, 66(4), 353–361.
Dragišić-Labaš, S. (2015). Domestic violence and alcohol use: security measures of com- pulsory treatment and a case study. Sociologija, LVII (2), 259–273. [In Serbian]
Establishing a policy of zero tolerance for domestic violence. Available at: https://www.mass.gov.
/>Facts and figures: Ending violence against women. (2022). Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures.
/>Gross, E. P., Cramer, E. P., Forte, J., Gordon, J. A., Kunkel, T., Moriarty, L. J. (2000). The impact of sentencing options on recidivism among domestic violence offenders: A case study. American journal of criminal justice, 24(2), 301−312.
Hamilton, L., Koehler, A. J., Lösel, A. F. (2012). Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programs in Europe, Part I: A survey of Current Practice. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 57(10). 1189–1205.
Hamel, J., (2010). Facts and Statistics on Prevalence of Partner Abuse Available at: https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/.
/>Hamilton, L., Koehler, J., Lösel, F. (2012). Domestic violence perpetrator programs in Europe, Part I: A survey of current practice. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 57(10), 1189–1205.
Ignjatović, Đ. (2021). Kriminologija, 16th edition. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu [In Serbian]
Ilić, G., Majić, M., Beljanski, S., Trešnjev, A. (2022). Comments on the Criminal Procedure Code, 11 ed. Beograd: Službeni glasnik. [In Serbian]
Intimate Partner Relationship Violence and Domestic Violence. Available at: https://www. womenngo.org.rs /srpski/11-konsultacije-za-zene/30-nasilje-u-partnerskim-od- nosima-i-u-porodici
Janković Jovanović, A. (2017). Legal Framework for the Application of Psychosocial Treatment in Cases of Domestic Violence. In: M. Mitić Lazarević, S. Škugor (eds). Psychosocial Treatment of Domestic Violence Perpetrators as a Ticket to Permanent Change (19-25). Beograd: IAN [In Serbian]
Jennings, L. (2016). The zero-tolerance approach to violence against women. Legal studies undergraduate journal, 1(1), 6–12.
Kolarić, D. (2021). A review of implementation of the Law on preventing domestic violence in the Republic Serbia. In: Đ. Ignjatović (ed.) Penal reaction in Serbia (182–188), vol. XI [In Serbian]
Laws on violence against women and girls Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/ what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women/facts-and-figures
Lilley-Walker, S-J., Hester, M., Turner, W. (2018). Evaluation of European Domestic Violence Perpetrator Programmes: Toward a Model for Designing and Reporting Evaluations Related to Perpetrator Treatment Interventions. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 62(4), 868–884.
Ljubičić, M. (2018). Reconciliation as an Alternative to Combatting Domestic Violence. In: Z. Kubirić, Lj. Ćumura & A. Zotova (eds). Peace and Reconciliation: collected papers (315-335). Novi Sad: CEIR [In Serbian]
Manić, Ž. (2017). Content Analysis in Sociology. Beograd: Čigoja štampa, Institut za soci- ološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu [In Serbian]
Myth: Duluth model. Available at: https://equi-law.uk/duluth-model.
/>National Statistics Domestic Violence Fact Sheet. Available at: https://ncadv.org/STATISTICS.
/>OSCE-led survey on violence against women. Well-being and Safety of Women, 2019, Serbia, OSCE. Available at: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/7/5/419756_1.pdf [In Serbian]
Psychosocial Treatment of Domestic Violence Perpetrators as a Ticket to Permanent Change Available at: https://www.ian.org.rs/arhiva/nasiljeuporodici/projekat/IAN_Informator.pdf.
/>Radić, G., (2017). Postponing Criminal Charges. In: M. Mitić Lazarević, S. Škugor (eds). Psychosocial Treatment of Domestic Violence Perpetrators as a Ticket to Permanent Change (43–46). Beograd: IAN [In Serbian]
Ristivojević, B. (2017). Is the new Act on prevention of domestic violence manifestation of so-called security law? CRIMEN – Journal for criminal justice, VIII (1), 3–21 [In Serbian]
Ristivojević, B., Samardžić, S. (2017). Law on Prevention of Domestic Violence - A Critical Review from the Legal Viewpoint. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu. no. 51(4), 1441–1451 [In Serbian]
Sardiha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., García-Moreno, C. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet, 399(10327).
Sartin, M. R., Hansen, J. D., Huss, T. M. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 425–440.
Saunders, D. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treat- ments for men who batter: Interaction of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence and victims, 11(4), 393−414.
Straus, M. (2014). Addressing violence by female partners is vital to prevent or stop violence against women: evidence from multisite batterer intervention evaluation. Violence against women, 20(7), 889–899.
Tuhina, G. (2019). OSCE: Two thirds of women in the Balkans are victims of violence. Free Europe. Available at: https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/oebs-istrazivanje-nasil- je/29806894.html#comments, 6 March 2019.
Tutty, L. M., Bidgood, B. A., Rothery, M. A., Bidgood, P. (2001). An evaluation of men’s batterer treatment groups. Research on Social Work Practice, 11(6), 645−670.
What is The Duluth Model? Available at: https://www.theduluthmodel.org/what-is-the- duluth-model/.
Zaksaitė, S. (2016). Protection from Domestic Violence: An Essential Human Right or a “Fight” Against Masculinity? Kriminologijos studijos, 4, 183–194.
Zarling, A., Berta, M., Bannon, S. (2019). Evaluation of acceptance and commitment therapy for domestic violence offenders. Psychology of violence, 9(3), 257–266.
https://domesticviolenceresearch.org/domestic-violence-facts-and-statistics-at-a-glance/
/>https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/hrp/vaw-estimates-how-to-use.pdf?s-fvrsn=f08e2424_13
/>https://www.ombudsman.rs/index.php/lang-sr_YU/izvestaji/posebnii-izvestaji/2106-2012- 01-12-13-43-33