TIPOLOGIJA AKADEMSKE SAMOREGULACIJE KOD DECE S LAKOM INTELEKTUALNOM OMETENOŠĆU

Aleksandra A. Đurić-Zdravković; Mirjana M. Japundža-Milisavljević; Dragosav D. Mutavdžić

doi:10.5937/specedreh11-2326

Aleksandra A. Đurić-Zdravković Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju
Mirjana M. Japundža-Milisavljević Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju
Dragosav D. Mutavdžić Institut za multidisciplinarne studije, Beograd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh11-2326

Sažetak

Ciljevi ovog istraživanja odnose se na utvrđivanje zastupljenosti tipova akademske samoregulacije kod dece sa lakom intelektualnom ometenošću, kao i ispitivanje uticaja starosti ispitanika na tipove akademske samoregulacije.

Uzorak učenika istraživanja uključuje 120 ispitanika, oba pola. Kriterijumi za izbor ispitanika podrazumevali su: količnik inteligencije učenika karakterističan za laku intelektualnu ometenost (od 51 do 69), kalendarski uzrast od 12 do 15 godina i 11 meseci, školski uzrast koji je podrazumevao uključivanje učenika od V do VIII razreda i odsustvo neuroloških, psihijatrijskih, izraženih emocionalnih i višestrukih smetnji.

U istraživanju korišćen je Upitnik akademske samoregulacije (Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire).

Rezultati pokazuju prevalenciju akademske identifikovane regulacije kod dece našeg uzorka. Ipak, uzorak je, ponderisanjem varijabli, ispoljio kontrolisani tip prema celokupnom kontinuumu motivacije. Zaključili smo da je intrinzična motivacija dvanaestogodišnjaka viša od intrinzične motivacije učenika koji pripadaju ostalim starosnim grupama.

Takođe, možemo da zaključimo da je među ispitanicima različitih starosnih grupa utvrđena statistički značajna razlika u stepenu samoodređenja. To bi značilo da učenike od 12 godina odlikuje ponašanje koje je više samoodređeno, nego što je to slučaj sa učenicima od 15 godina.

Reference

Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11 (4), 227-268.

Deci, E. L. (2004). Promoting Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in People with Mental Retardation, In Switzky H., Glidden L. M. (Eds.), Personality and Motivational Systems in Mental Retardation, International review of research in mental retardation, (pp. 1-25), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Deci, E. L., Hodges, R., Pierson, L., & Tomassone, J. (1992). Autonomy and competence as motivational factors in students with learning disabilities and emotional handicaps. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25 (7), 457-471.

Goldberg, S. (2003). Attachment and development. London: Arnold, a member of the Hodder Headline Group.

Gronlick, W. S. & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in children with learning disabilities: A multiple group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23 (3), 177-184.

Hayamizu, T. (1997). Between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Examination of reasons for academic study based on the theory of internalization. Japanese Psychological Research,. 39 (2), 98-108.

Harter, S. (2001). The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

Hautamäki, J., Arinen, P., Eronen, S., Hautamäki, A., Kupiainen, S. Lindblom, B., Niemivirta, M., Pakaslahti, L., Rantanen, P. & Scheinin, P. (2002). Assessing Learning-to-Learn, a Framework. Helsinki: University Printing House.

Haywood, H. C. (2006a). Broader perspectives on mental retardation. Foreword to H. N. Switzky & S. Greenspan (Eds.), What is mental retardation? Revised. Ideas for an evolving disability in the 21st century (pp. xv-xx) Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

Haywood, H. C. (2006b). A transactional perspective on mental retardation. In H. N. Switzky (Ed.), Mental retardation, personality, and motivational systems. (International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, Vol. 31), pp. 289-314. New York and Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.

Hoskins, B., & Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? Luxembourg: European Commission.

Jacobs, J., Lanza, S., Osgood, D., Eccles, J. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73 (2), 509–527.

Lepper, M., Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivational Orientations in the Classroom: Age Differences and Academic Correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (2), 184–196.

Matejić-Đuričić, Z. (2012). Nove konceptualizacije razvoja i vaspitanja. Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija, 11 (2), 267-284.

Mirkov, S. (2007). Samoregulacija u učenju – primena strategija i uloga orjentacija na ciljeve. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoška istraživanja, 39 (2), 309-328.

Mithaug, D., Campeau, P. & Wolman, J. (2003). Assessing self-determination prospects among students with and without disabilities. In Mithaug, D. E., Mithaug, D. K., Agran, M., Martin, J. & Wehmeyer, M. (Eds.), Self-Determined Learning Theory. Construction, Evaluation and Verification (pp. 61-76). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Patrick, B., Skinner, E. & Connell, J. (1993). What motivates Children’s behavior and emotion? Joint effects of perceived control and autonomy in the academic domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 781–791.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (5), 749-761.

Ryan, M. R. & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54-67.

Ryan, M. R. & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78.

Ryan, M. R. & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (eds.): Handbook of self-determination research (3-36). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D, J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and Methods (pp. 618-655). New York: Wiley.

Ryan, R., La Guardia, J., Solky-Butzel, J., Chirkov, V. & Kim, Y. (2005). On the interpersonal regulation of emotions: Emotional reliance across gender, relationships, and culture. Personal relationships, 12 (1), 145-163.

Switzky, H. N., & Haywood, H. C. (1991). Self-reinforcement schedules in persons with mild mental retardation: Effects of motivational orientation and instructional demands. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 35, 221-230.

Thuneberg, M. (2007). Is a Majority Enough? Psychological Well-Being and its Relation to Academic and Prosocial Motivation, Self-Regulation and Achievement at School. Academic Dissertation, Helsinki: Faculty of Behavioural Sciences at the University of Helsinki.

Velki, T. (2011). The correlation considering the degree of autonomous motivation, academic achievement and mental health. Croatian Journal of Education, 13 (3), 56-87.