SAVREMENI MODELI AMPLIFIKACIJE SENZORINEURALNIH I KONDUKTIVNIH OŠTEĆENJA SLUHA

  • Sanja B Ostojic Univerzitet u Beogradu Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju Odeljenje za surdologiju

Abstract


Osnovna funkcija slušnih pomagala je da poboljšaju auditorne i govorne sposobnosti gluvih ili nagluvih korisnika. Model amplifikacije treba da bude prilagođen uzrastu i ličnim potrebama, stepenu i vrsti oštećenja sluha.

Cilj rada je da analiziramo aktuelne modele amplifikacije senzorineuralnih i konduktivnih oštećenja sluha koji mogu da obezbede visok kvalitet percepcije govora i zvukova iz okoline bez obzira na vrstu i stepen slušne disfunkcije. Aktuelni model amplifikacije za konduktivna oštećenja sluha je BAHA ugradni aparat. Koristi se kod trajne konduktivne ili mešovite nagluvosti lakog i srednje teškog  stepena, kod kojih durgim operacijama nije moguće popraviti sluh. Može se primeniti i kod jednostrane gluvoće, ukoliko je sluh na drugom uvu očuvan. Za senzorineuralna oštećenja sluha, poslednja generacija pomagala je kohlearni implant. U savremenim uslovima života, binauralno slušanje korisnicima kohlearnog implanta omogućava bimodalna amplifikacija, tj. slušni aparat na neimplantiranom uvu. U edukativnom preocesu i komunikaciji na daljinu, od velike koristi je FM sistem. Njegova osnovna namena je da smanji udaljenost između izvora zvuka i slušaoca jer je intenzitet zvučnog signala sve slabiji što je dalji od njegovog izvora. Primena različitih modela amplifikacije, od surdologa, audiologa  i drugih stručnjaka,  iziskuje vrlo visok nivo znanja i kontinuiranu edukaciju u oblasti ampkifikacije.

Ključne reči: gluvoća, nagluvost, amplifikacija.

Author Biography

Sanja B Ostojic, Univerzitet u Beogradu Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju Odeljenje za surdologiju
Odeljenje za surdologiju, vanredni profesor

References

Baumgartner W.D., Pok S. M. (2002). The role of age in pediatric cochlear implantation, Inernational Journal of Pediatric othorhinolaryngology, 62, 223-228.

Crandell, C.,Smaldino, J.,(2001). Improving Classroom Acoustics: uhling hearing assestiv etehnology and communicatives strategies in educational settings, Volta Revial, 101: 47-62.

Federspil, P.A. (2006). Indications and limits of bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA), 77th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, German Medical Science; Doc06hno044

Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M.F., McKarns, S.A., Spahr, A.J. (2007). Combined Electric and Contralateral Acoustic Hearing: Word and Sentence Recognition With Bimodal Hearing,

Huart, S. A., Sammeth, C. A. (2008). Hearing aids plus cochlear implants: Optimizing the bimodal pediatric fitting, Hearing Journal, 61( 11), 54-58.

Lenards, T.(1998). Cochlear Implants: selection criteria and shifting borders, Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica 52, 183-199.

Lewis, MS., (2004). Speech Perception in noise: directional microphones versus frequency modulation (FM) systems, Journal of American Academy Audology (15) 426.

Maltby,M.T. (2002). Principles of Hearing Aid Audiology, Whurr Publisher London and Philadelphia, Second edition

Mikulec, A.(2009). Placement of the Bahaosseointegrated implant in children, Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 20, ( 3), 197-201

Niparko, J. K.,Cox, K. M., Lustig, L. R. (2003). Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness, Otology Neurotolgy, 24 (1), 73-78.

Ostojić S., Mirić D., Mikić B. (2008). Hearing Function In Children With Bimodal Stimulation; Abstracts of NHS 2008, 109.

Potts, L., Skinner, M., Litovsky, R., Strube, M., Kuk, F. (2009). ecognition and Localization of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Wearing a Digital Hearing Aid in the Non-implanted Ear (Bimodal Hearing), Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 20(6): 353-373.

Shallop, J.K., Arndt, P.,L., Turnacliff, K.,A. (1992). Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: Perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. Journal Spoken Language Patholgy and Audiology 16, 141-148.

Sinopoli, T. (2006). Candidacy Criteria for the Baha System, Audilogy Online, 6, 3-4

Snik, A. F., Mylanus, E. A., Cremers, C., W. (2002). The bone-anchored hearing aid in patients with a unilateral air-bone gap, Otology Neurotology, 23 (1), 61-66.

Thibodeau, L.(2010). Benefit of Adaptive FM systems on SpeechRecognition in Noise for Listerners who use HearingAids, American Journal of Audiology, (19) 36-48.

Tyler, R., Parkinson, A., Wilson, B., et al.(2004) Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: Speech perception and localization, Ear Hear 23, 98-105.

Van der Westhuizen, L., Van Dijk, C. (2007). Auditory functioning with cochlear implants of bimodal amplification, Journal of Communcation Disorders, 2007;54:90-104.

Wazen, J.,Spitzer, J.et al (2001). Results of the bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral hearing loss, Laryngoscope, 111 (6), 955-958.

Wazen, J. J.,Spitzer, J. B.et al (2003). Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 129 (3), 248-254

Warren,R.M.(2008). Auditory Perception,Cambrige University Press,New York

FM sistem, „Phonak“ http://www.audiologyshop.com/phonakfm.html

Published
2012/10/24
Section
Professional Paper