The voice of visually impaired students: Differentiated mathematics instruction in an inclusive class

  • Sumbaji Putranto Uniersitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Marsigit Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Elly Arliani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Ključne reči: glas učenika, oštećenje vida, diferencirana instrukcija, inkluzivni čas, matematika

Sažetak


Uvod: Prethodna istraživanja pokazala su da se inkluzivno obrazovanje suočava sa nekoliko prepreka, posebno među učenicima sa oštećenjem vida (OV), u učenju matematike. Nastavnici mogu da koriste glasove učenika kako bi povećali njihovo angažovanje i pružili im nove perspektive učenja. Cilj: Ova studija imala je za cilj da istraži glasove učenika sa oštećenjem vida (OV) o diferenciranoj nastavi matematike u inkluzivnim odeljenjima. Metod: Istraživanje je fenomenološko, sa intervjuima kao ključnim elementom u prikupljanju podataka. Učesnici su odabrani korišćenjem namenskog uzorkovanja, a uzorak su činili četiri slabovida učenika i šest slepih učenika starosti 16–18 godina. Podaci su analizirani kroz redukciju podataka, njihovu prezentaciju i izvođenje zaključaka. Rezultati: Rezultati su pokazali da učenici sa OV razumeju pojam diferencirane nastave (DN). Oni su tvrdili da dobro učenje matematike postižu kroz detaljna objašnjenja nastavnika i praktične aktivnosti. Učenicima sa OV potrebna je diferencijacija procesa, ali im nije potrebna diferencijacija sadržaja. Nekoliko stvari koje se moraju uzeti u obzir u diferenciranoj nastavi iz matematike su: 1) učenje o medijumima koje može pomoći u razumevanju materijala koji se odnosi na grafičke prikaze, 2) sposobnost nastavnika da objasni materijal koji se odnosi na grafičke prikaze, uključujući i pojednostavljenje matematičkih sadržaja i 3) uslovljenost okruženja za učenje radi obezbeđenja bezbednosti na času i adekvatnog mesta u razredu na kojem učenici sa OV sede, poželjno pored vršnjaka koji vide. Zaključak: Nalazi potvrđuju zaključke nekoliko prethodnih studija da učenici sa OV pokazuju visoku samoefikasnost u diferenciranoj nastavi matematike. To pokazuje da učenici imaju poverenje u svoje sposobnosti, tako da ne zahtevaju diferencijaciju sadržaja. Dobijeni nalazi takođe potvrđuju rezultate prethodnih istraživanja u kojima je istaknuta potreba za korišćenjem medijuma za učenje i praktičnih aktivnosti za učenike sa OV.

Reference

Algolaylat, A. S., Alodat, A. M., Muhidat, M. A., & Almakanin, H. A. (2023). Perspectives of Students with Disabilities on Inclusive Education Challenges in Higher Education: A Case Study of a Jordanian University. TEM Journal, 12(1), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM121-50
Aliyeva, A. (2021). Differentiated Instruction, Perceptions and Practices. In Inclusive Education in a Post-Soviet Context (pp. 67–97). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65543-3_4
Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. In European Journal of Special Needs Education (Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 129–147). https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
Bacolod-Iglesia, A. B., Hangeline Habibulla Dundain, M anilyn Vegare-M iñoza, & Arvin Barretto Casimiro. (2021). Teaching Mathematics in ‘Different Tongues’: An Analysis of Mathematics Anxiety and Proficiency among Elementary-Grade Learners. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(2), 860–891. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS2.1523
Baines, L. A., & Slutsky, R. (2009). Developing the Sixth Sense: Play. Educational HORIZONS, 97–101. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ826480.pdf
Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bappenas. (2021). Tinjauan Peningkatan Akses dan Taraf Hidup Penyandang Disabilitas Indonesia: Aspek Sosioekonomi dan Yuridis (Review of Improving Access and Living Standards for Indonesian People with Disabilities: Socioeconomic and Juridical Aspects). Staf Ahli Menteri Bidang Sosial dan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan, Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.
Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016). Pedagogic voice: student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 24(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1087044
Bilal, A. (2017). Problems faced by the students with visual impairment in learning Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.24802
Bobis, J., Russo, J., Downton, A., Feng, M., Livy, S., McCormick, M., & Sullivan, P. (2021). Instructional moves that increase chances of engaging all students in learning mathematics. Mathematics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/MATH9060582
Bosman, A., & Schulze, S. (2018). Learning style preferences and mathematics achievement of secondary school learners. South African Journal of Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38n1a1440
Brunes, A., Hansen, M. B., & Heir, T. (2021). General self-efficacy in individuals with visual impairment compared with the general population. PLoS ONE, 16(7 July). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254043
Charteris, J., & Thomas, E. (2017). Uncovering ‘unwelcome truths’ through student voice: teacher inquiry into agency and student assessment literacy. Teaching Education, 28(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291
Cholsakorn, P., & Piamsai, C. (2022). The effects of differentiated reading instruction on reading comprehension and self-efficacy of Thai undergraduate students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(3), 715–720. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.3.24
Costello, S., & Boyle, C. (2013). Pre-service secondary teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2013v38n4.8
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative Inquary and Research Design (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Emerson, R. W., & Anderson, D. (2018). What Mathematical Images Are in a Typical Mathematics Textbook? Implications for Students with Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200103
Fatimah, A. E., Siagian, M. D., Suwanto, Wahyuni, F., & Purba, A. (2022). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability Using Differentiated Instruction Approach. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2468. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102628
Ferguson, D. L., Hanreddy, A., & Draxton, S. (2011). Giving students voice as a strategy for improving teacher practice. London Review of Education, 9(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2011.550435
Forde, C., Horgan, D., Martin, S., & Parkes, A. (2018). Learning from children’s voice in schools: Experiences from Ireland. Journal of Educational Change, 19(4), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9331-6
Göransson, K., & Nilholm, C. (2014). Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings - a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545
Graham, A., Truscott, J., Simmons, C., Anderson, D., & Thomas, N. (2018). Exploring student participation across different arenas of school life. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3477
Guay, F., Roy, A., & Valois, P. (2017). Teacher structure as a predictor of students’ perceived competence and autonomous motivation: The moderating role of differentiated instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12146
Hackenberg, A. J., Creager, M., & Eker, A. (2021a). Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1731656
Hackenberg, A. J., Creager, M., & Eker, A. (2021b). Teaching practices for differentiating mathematics instruction for middle school students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(2), 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1731656
Hackett, G., & Betz, N. E. (1989). An Exploration of the Mathematics Self-Efficacy/Mathematics Performance Correspondence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 261. https://doi.org/10.2307/749515
Hardy, I., & Woodcock, S. (2015). Inclusive education policies: Discourses of difference, diversity and deficit. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2014.908965
Hayes, C., & Proulx, M. J. (2023). Turning a blind eye? Removing barriers to science and mathematics education for students with visual impairments. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196221149561
Herner-Patnode, L., & Lee, H.-J. (2021). Differentiated Instruction to Teach Mathematics: Through the Lens of Responsive Teaching. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(6), 6–25. https://mted.merga.net.au/index.php/mted/article/view/658
Hunter, J., Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2020). Shifting towards equity: challenging teacher views about student capability in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00293-y
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. In Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction. Northwest University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025935
Jones, S. R. (2018). Prototype images in mathematics education: the case of the graphical representation of the definite integral. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9794-z
Kamarulzaman, M. H., Kamarudin, M. F., Sharif, M. S. A. M., Esrati, M. Z., Saali, M. M. S. N., & Yusof, R. (2022). Impact of Differentiated Instruction on the Mathematical Thinking Processes of Gifted and Talented Students. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(4), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4253
Keddie, A. (2015). Student voice and teacher accountability: possibilities and problematics. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 23(2), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.977806
Kizilaslan, A., Zorluoglu, S. L., & Sozbilir, M. (2021). Improve learning with hands-on classroom activities: science instruction for students with visual impairments. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1732110
Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: Recent research and emerging directions. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16 PARTA, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A004
Kvale, S., & Brinkman, S. (2009). Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
Lai, C. P., Zhang, W., & Chang, Y. L. (2020). Differentiated instruction enhances sixth-grade students’ mathematics self-efficacy, learning motives, and problem-solving skills. Social Behavior and Personality, 48(6). https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9094
Lindner, K. T., & Schwab, S. (2020). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
Loreman, T., Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Sharma, U., & Deppeler, J. (2014). Conceptualising and measuring inclusive education. In International Perspectives on Inclusive Education (Vol. 3, pp. 3–17). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620140000003015
Maguvhe, M. (2015). Teaching science and mathematics to students with visual impairments: Reflections of a visually impaired technician. African Journal of Disability, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v4i1.194
Maulana, R., Smale-Jacobse, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., Chun, S., & Lee, O. (2020). Measuring differentiated instruction in The Netherlands and South Korea: factor structure equivalence, correlates, and complexity level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(4), 881–909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00446-4
McDuffie, K. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2008). The contributions of qualitative research to discussions of evidence-based practice in special education. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451208321564
Messiou, K., & Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusive Inquiry: Student–teacher dialogue as a means of promoting inclusion in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 670–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3602
Moustakas, C. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.
Nilholm, C. (2021). Research about inclusive education in 2020–How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(3), 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2020.1754547
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Papanthymou, A., & Darra, M. (2022). Perceptions of Primary School Teachers Regarding the Implementation of Differentiated Instruction to Students with Learning Difficulties. World Journal of Education, 12(5), 19. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n5p19
Parr, J., & Hawe, E. (2022). Student pedagogic voice in the literacy classroom: a review. In Research Papers in Education (Vol. 37, Issue 6, pp. 773–796). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864769
Pearce, T. C., & Wood, B. E. (2019). Education for transformation: an evaluative framework to guide student voice work in schools. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1219959
Qu, X. (2022a). A critical realist model of inclusive education for children with special educational needs and/or disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1760366
Qu, X. (2022b). Structural barriers to inclusive education for children with special educational needs and disabilities in China. Journal of Educational Change, 23(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09426-2
Rosenblum, L. P., Cheng, L., & Beal, C. R. (2018). Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments Share Experiences and Advice for Supporting Students in Understanding Graphics. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 575–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200505
Roy, A., Guay, F., & Valois, P. (2013). Teaching to address diverse learning needs: Development and validation of a Differentiated Instruction Scale. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(11), 1186–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.743604
Rozgonjuk, D., Kraav, T., Mikkor, K., Orav-Puurand, K., & Täht, K. (2020). Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00246-z
Sahin, M., & Yorek, N. (2009). Teaching science to visually impaired students: A small-scale qualitative study. US-China Education Review, 6(4), 1548–6613.
Savelsbergh, E. R., Prins, G. T., Rietbergen, C., Fechner, S., Vaessen, B. E., Draijer, J. M., & Bakker, A. (2016). Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: A meta-analytic study. Educational Research Review, 19, 158–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self Efficacy and Academic Motivation. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 26(4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
Shams, L., & Seitz, A. R. (2008). Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(11), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.006
Simmie, G. M., Moles, J., & O’Grady, E. (2019). Good teaching as a messy narrative of change within a policy ensemble of networks, superstructures and flows. Critical Studies in Education, 60(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2016.1219960
Skerritt, C., Brown, M., & O’Hara, J. (2021). Student voice and classroom practice: how students are consulted in contexts without traditions of student voice. Pedagogy, Culture and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1979086
Smith, D. W., & Smothers, S. M. (2012). The Role and Characteristics of Tactile Graphics in Secondary Mathematics and Science Textbooks in Braille. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 543–554. http://jvib.org/CEUs.
Specht, J., McGhie-Richmond, D., Loreman, T., Mirenda, P., Bennett, S., Gallagher, T., Young, G., Metsala, J., Aylward, L., Katz, J., Lyons, W., Thompson, S., & Cloutier, S. (2016). Teaching in inclusive classrooms: Efficacy and beliefs of Canadian preservice teachers. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1059501
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Valiandes, S., & Neophytou, L. (2018). Teachers’ professional development for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: investigating the impact of a development program on teachers’ professional learning and on students’ achievement. Teacher Development, 22(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196
Webster, R., & Blatchford, P. (2015). Worlds apart? The nature and quality of the educational experiences of pupils with a statement for special educational needs in mainstream primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 324–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3144
Ziernwald, L., Hillmayr, D., & Holzberger, D. (2022). Promoting High-Achieving Students Through Differentiated Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms—A Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 540–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221112931
Objavljeno
2024/11/26
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak