Informisanost logopeda sa područja Crne Gore o asistivnoj tehnologiji za decu sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije
Sažetak
Uvod: Asistivna tehnologija obuhvata sredstva i uređaje koji mogu da se koriste u izvornom, modifikovanom ili prilagođenom obliku. Primena asistivne tehnologije kod dece sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije omogućava efikasno uspostavljanje socijalne interakcije, izražavanje potreba i želja, kao i povećanje nezavisnosti, samopoštovanja i produktivnosti. Cilj: Cilj ovog istraživanja je bio da se proceni nivo informisanosti logopeda koji su zaposleni na teritoriji republike Crne Gore o asistivnoj tehnologiji za decu sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije. Takođe, da se utvrdi koje sociodemografske varijable utiču na procenjeni nivo informisanosti ispitanika. Metode: U istraživanju je učestvovalo 48 logopeda koji su zaposleni na teritoriji republike Crne Gore. U istraživanju je korišćen online upitnik koji je posebno konstruisan za potrebe ovog istraživanja. Rezultati: Dobijeni rezultati pokazuju da ispitanici smatraju da su informisani o asistivnoj tehnologiji za decu sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije (M = 4.03, SD = 0.46). Analiza rezultata je pokazala da stepen obrazovanja, kao i dužina radnog staža, nisu statistički značajno povezani sa procenjenim nivoom informisanosti. Dobijeni podaci ukazuju na to da 27.10% ispitanika ne koristi nijedan uređaj u tretmanu dece sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije. Cboard aplikacija se najčešće primenjuje u logopedskom tretmanu. Rezultati istraživanja pokazuju da logopedima nedostaje znanje o visokoj asistivnoj tehnologiji, kao i obuka za upotrebu ove tehnologije. Zaključak: Obuka logopeda trebalo bi da bude usmerena na oblast primene asistivne tehnologije u tretmanu dece sa poremećajima verbalne komunikacije, na način razvoja timskog pristupa i međunarodne saradnje, kao i na informisanje o ustanovama koje pružaju tehnološku pomoć korisnicima.
Reference
Adya, M., Samant, D., Scherer, M. J., Killeen, M., & Morris, M. W. (2012). Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cognitive Processing, 13, 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-012-0466-8
Albudoor, N., & Peña, E. D. (2021). Factors influencing US speech and language therapists’ use of technology for clinical practice. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 56(3), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12614
Al-Dawaideh, A. M. (2013). Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of the Importance and Ability to Use Assistive Technology in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Education, 3(6), 64-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v3n6p64
Alsari, N. A., Alshair, A. M., Almalik, S. A., & Alsa’ad, S. S. (2021). A survey on the awareness, accessibility and funding for augmentative and alternative communication services and devices in Saudi Arabia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(7), 789-795. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1736651
Arsenić, I., Jovanović Simić, N., & Daničić, Z. (2022). Primena asistivne tehnologije za komunikaciju u edukaciji učenika sa smetnjama u razvoju: Samoprocena nastavnog osoblja. Nastava i vaspitanje, 71(2), 267‒282. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2202267A
Arsenić, I., Jovanović Simić, N., & Veljković, Z. (2023). Karakteristike augmentativne i alternativne komunikacije i strategije za njeno unapređenje. U A. Đurić Zdravković, S. Antić, i J. Maksić (Ur.). Intervencije u ranom detinjstvu i predškolstvu (str. 11‒20). Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.
Bergem, S. (2020). Knowledge among important actors in the field of adaptive equipment for young people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1538393
Chmiliar, L. (2007). Perspectives on assistive technology: What teachers, health professionals, and speech and language pathologists have to say. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 35(1-2), 1-17.
Chua, E. C. K., & Gorgon, E. J. R. (2019). Augmentative and alternative communication in the Philippines: A survey of speech-language pathologist competence, training, and practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2019.1576223
Connor, C., Snell, M., Gansneder, B., & Dexter, S. (2010). Special education teachers’ use of assistive technology with students who have severe disabilities. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(3), 369-386.
Costigan, F. A., & Light, J. (2010). A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists. Assistive Technology®, 22(4), 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2010.492774
Davis, T. N., Barnard-Brak, L., & Arredondo, P. L. (2013). Assistive technology: Decision-making practices in public schools. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 32(4), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051303200403
Drigas, A., & Petrova, A. (2014). ICTs in speech and language therapy. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(1), 49-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i1.3280
Gitlow, L., & Sanford, T. (2003). Assistive technology education needs of allied health professionals in a rural state. Journal of Allied Health, 32(1), 46-51.
Glykas, M., & Chytas, P. (2004). Technology assisted speech and language therapy. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 73(6), 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.05.005
Hall, K. S. (2013). The Effect of Specific Professional Development on Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions of Their Knowledge, Skill, and Confidence in using the iPad as a Speech-Generating Device with Students who have Complex Communication Needs [master's theses, University of New Hampshire, Durham]. https://scholars.unh.edu/thesis/799/
Howard, J., Fisher, Z., Kemp, A. H., Lindsay, S., Tasker, L. H., & Tree, J. J. (2022). Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 17(4), 390-408. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1788181
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (2004). United States Congress. http://www.parentcenterhub.org/wp-content/uploads/repo_items/PL108-446.pdf
Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588
Jovanović, N., i Terzić, I. (2011). Primena augmentativne i alternativne komunikacije kod osoba sa govorno-jezičkim poremećajima različite etiologije. U N. Glumbić, i V. Vučinić (Ur.), Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas (str. 300‒305). Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.
Jovanović Simić, N., Arsenić, I., i Veljković, Z. (2023). Barijere u primeni asistivne tehnologije za komunikaciju. U Lj. Isaković, S. Ćopić, M. Jelić, i B. Drljan (Ur.), Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija danas (str. 279‒285). Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju.
Jurišić, L., Pinjatela, R., & Perić Bralo, M. (2022). Experiences of experts in using assistive technology. Research in Education and Rehabilitation, 5(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.51558/2744-1555.2022.5.2.91
Lindsay S. (2010). Perceptions of health care workers prescribing augmentative and alternative communication devices to children. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 5(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483101003718195
Manship, S., Hatzidimitriadou, E., Moore, J., Stein, M., Towse, D., & Smith, R. (2024). The experiences and perceptions of health-care professionals regarding assistive technology training: a systematic review. Assistive Technology, 36(2), 123-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2023.2219294
Marvin, L. A., Montano, J. J., Fusco, L. M., & Gould, E. P. (2003). Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of their training and experience in using alternative and augmentative communication. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 30, 76-83.
Matthews, R. (2001). A survey to identify therapiststs' high-tech knowledge, application and training. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(S1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820109177860
Scherer, M. J. (2002). Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. American Psychological Association.
Sva prava zadržana (c) 2025 Specijalna edukacija i rehabilitacija
Ovaj rad je pod Creative Commons Autorstvo-Deli pod istim uslovima 4.0 međunarodnom licencom.