Neformalni oblici oblici društvene anomije
Sažetak
Тема овог научног рада смештена је у домен друштвене аномије. Ефекти деловања појавних облика друштвене аномије изазивају друштвену ентропију и указују на трајну актуелност теме. Друштвена аномија разара друштвене процесе, обезвређује институције и девастира темељне вредности на којима почива заједница, па је Друштвени значај истраживања неупитан. Научна оправданост садржана је у потреби да се појаве и процеси из домена друштвене патологије расветле. Циљ истраживања је да се посматране појаве: дефинишу, класификују, систематизују и да се понуде оптимална решења за њихово превазилажење. Рад за Предмет истраживања има: откривање и дефинисање појавних облика друштвене аномије, указивање на штетност деловања ових неформалних oблика друштвеног понашања, као и давање предлога решења за превазилажење настале ситуације како би се штетна деловања отклонила. Аутори у раду полазе од: метода посматрања, анализе садржаја, развојног метода, упоредног приступа, метода унакрсних култура те низа метода из правних наука. Предметни оквир истраживања креће се у простору: социологије, социјалне патологије, политичких и правних наука.
Reference
Ackerman, Susan Rose, and Bonie Palifika. 2016. Corruption and Government – Causes, Consequeces and Reform. Second Edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Amundsen, Inge. 1999. Political Corruption: An Introduction to the Issues, Working paper. Bergen: Chr. Michaelsen Institute.
Aristotel. 1988. Fizika. Zagreb: Globus, Sveučilišna naklada Liber.
Barbalet, Jack. 2021. The theory of guanxi and Chinese society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barbalet, Jack. 2023. ”Conceptualising informal institutions: Drawing on the case of guanxi.” The British Journal of Sociology 74 (1): 70-72.
Bian, Yanjie. 2019. Guanxi How China Works (China Today). New York: Polity.
Bliznakovski, Jovan. 2018. Benefit-Seeking and the Patron-Client Linkage: Evidence from six Balkan Societies. Paper prepared for the workshop: Political Clientelism in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice, ECPR Joint Sessions, Nicosia, 10-14 April 2018. Последњи приступ 23. фебруар. https://www.academia.edu/37909294/%2049%20Benefit_Seeking_and_the_Patron_Client_Linkage_Evidence_from_six_Balkan_Societies
Bull, Martin J. and James Newel. 2003. Corruption in Contemporary Politics. Gordonsvile: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burger Thomas. 1977. “Talcott Parsons, the Problem of Order in Society, and the Program of an Analytical Sociology”. American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 83. № 2: 320-339. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Çarikçi İlker Hüseyin, Ahmet Sait Özkul, Aygen Demir Oksay, and Hasan Hüseyin Uzunbacak. 2009. “Favoritism and Nepotism in The Ottoman Empire“. International Symposium on Sustainable Development: 498-504. June 9-10 2009, Sarajevo.
Colignon, Richard A. and Chikako Usui. 2003. Amakudari The Hidden Fabric of Japan’s Economy. New York: Cornell University Press.
Cvejić Slobodan, i Dragan Stanojević. 2016. “Varying context of political clientelism – comparative analysis of Serbia and Kosovo*.” In Informal Power Networks, Political Patronage and Clientelism in Serbia and Kosovo*, ed. Slobodan Cvejić, 123-131. Belgrade: SeConS.
Dohrenwend, Bruce. 1959. ”Egoism, Altruism, Anomie, and Fatalism – A Conceptual Analysis of Durkheim’s Types“. American Sociological Review 24 (4): 466-473.
Durkheim, David Émille. 1897. Le Suicide. Paris: Félix Alcan Éditeur.
Ellwood, Charles. 1916. ”Objectivism in Sociology“. American Journal of Sociology 22 (3): 289-305.
Fazekas, Mihály. 2017. ”Red tape, bribery and government favouritism: evidence from Europe“. Crime, Law and Social Change 68: 403-429.
Fisman, Ray, and Miriam Golden. 2017. Corruption: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guthrie, Doug. 2002. Dragon in a Three-Piece Suit: The Emergence of Capitalism in China. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heidenheimer, Arnold, Michael Johnston. 2011. Political Corruption – Concepts and Contexts. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Hilbert, Richard. 1989. ”Durkheim and Merton on Anomie – An Unexplored Contrast and Its Derivatives“. Social Problems 36 (3): 242-250.
Holmes, Leslie. 2015. Corruption – a very short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hookway, Nicholas. 2014. “Moral decline sociology – Critiquing the legacy of Durkheim“. Journal of Sociology XX(X): 1-14.
Huntington, Samuel P. 2007. “Modernization and Corruption.” In Political Corruption, Concepts and Contexts, third edition, eds. Arnold J. Heidenheimer et al., 253-263. New York: Routledge.
Im Hohjin, and Chen Chuansheng. 2020. ”Cultural dimensions as correlates of favoritism and the mediating role of trust“. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management 27 (3): 417-445.
Jones, Douglas. 2022. “Clientelism and its discontents: The role of wasta in shaping political attitudes and participation in Jordan.“ Mediterranean Politics. doi: 10.1080/13629395.2022.2114064. Последњи приступ 15. март 2023. Clientelism and its discontents: The role of wasta in shaping political attitudes and participation in Jordan: Mediterranean Politics: Vol 0, No 0 (tandfonline.com)
Jones, Robert, and Tracy Stout. 2015. “Policing Nepotism and Cronysm Without Losing the Value of Social Connection.“ Industr. Organisat. Psychol. 8: 2-12. doi: 10.1017/iop.2014.3
Jones, Robert. 2013. Nepotism in Organizations. New Yourk: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1986. A Dictionary of Cybernetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Ledeneva, Alena V. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Network Powers and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martz, John. 1997. The Politics of Clientelism: Democracy and the State in Colombia. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Merton, Robert. 1949. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
Merton, Robert. 1938. ”Social Structure and Anomie“. American Sociological Review: 672-682.
Müller, Hans-Peter. 2013. ”Société, morale et individualisme – La théorie morale d’Emile Durkheim“. Trivium 13. Последњи приступ 20. март 2013. https://journals.openedition.org/trivium/4490
Nan, Lin. 2001. “Guanxi: A Conceptual Analysis.” In The Chinese triangle of Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Comparative Institutional Analyses, eds. Lin, Nan and Dudly Poston, 153-166. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Panizza Francisco, Guy Peters, and Conrado Ramos Lallaburu. 2023. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1392, Последњи приступ 5. март 2023. https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1392;jsessionid=0D1347C96D5CB0E74ED9B24CCD
Perić Diligenski, Tijana. 2018. „Koruptivno u srpskoj političkoj kulturi“. U Identitet, politička kultura, institucije, knjiga 7, ur. Vladan Stanković, 101-117. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Perić Diligenski, Tijana. 2020. “The Capitalist State and Informal Institutional Arrangments - one aporia” In New Understanding of Capital in the Twenty-First Century, eds. Vesna Stanković Pejnović and Ivan Matić, 416-428. Belgrade: Institute for Political Studies.
Perić Diligenski, Tijana. 2021. Rasprava o političkoj korupciji. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.
Philp, Mark. 2007. “Conceptualizing Political Corruption.” In Political Corruption Concepts and Contexts, third edition, eds. Arnold J. Heidenheimer et al., 41-57. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Piras, Mauro. 2004. “Les fondements sociaux de l’agir normatif chez Durkheim et Weber – le rôle du sacré“. Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions 27 (3): juillet-septembre): 139-166.
Prenzler, Tim. 2021. “Grey corruption issues in the public sector“. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 7 (2): 137-149.
Roniger, Luis. 2004. “Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy”. Comparative Politics 36 (3): 353-375.
Scott, Richard W. 2014. Institutions and organizations Ideas, Interests and Identities. New York: Sage Publishing.
Shaheen, Sadia, Muhammad Waseen Bari, Filza Hameed and Muhammad Mudassar Anwar. “Organisational Cronysm as an Antecedent of Ingratiation: Mediating Role of Ralational Psychological Contract.“ Front. Psychol. doi: 10:3389/fpsyg. Последњи приступ 28. фебруар 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01609/full
Stanković, Vladan. 2018. „Srpski identitet, politička kultura i odnos prema institucijama“. U Identitet, politička kultura, institucije, knjiga 7, ur. Vladan Stanković, 119-139. Beograd: Institut za političke studije.
Stein, Howard. 1984. ”A Note on Patron-Client Theory“. Ethos 12 (1): 1: 30-36.
Szakonyi, David. 2019. “Princelings in the Private Sector: The Value of Nepotism.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 14 (4): 349-381. doi:10.1561/100.00018087.
Szanyi, Miklos. 2022. “The emergence of patronage and changing forms of rent-seeking in East Central Europe.” Post-Communist Economies 34 (1): 122-141.
Tang, Ling. 2020. “Gendered and sexualized guanxi: the use of erotic capital in the work place in urban China.” Asia Pacific Business Review 26 (2): 190-208.
Tsai, Kellee S. 2007. Capitalism Without Democracy: The Private Sector in Contemporary China. New York: Cornell University Press.
Vuković, Danilo i Bojan Spaić. 2022. “Parallel normative reality: the informal order of corruption and clientelism in Serbia.” Sociologija 64 (4): 519-542, doi: 10.2298/SOC220419V.
Wodarski, John, and Sophia Dziegielewski. 2002. Human Behavior and the Social Environment – Integrating Theory and Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Springer.
Zindović Ilija, i Vladan Stanković. 2012. „Legalizovani oblici korupcije u Srbiji – anomična stanja društvene entropije“. Sociološki pregled XLVI (1): 17-34.
