NEW – OLD TRENDS IN THE FIELD OF CRIMINAL POLICY IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
Sažetak
The Draft Law on Amendments to the Criminal Code of 2025 announces a significant reform of Serbia’s substantive criminal legislation. In addition to a series of newly introduced criminal offences – many of them controversial from a criminal policy standpoint – it also proposes a substantial tightening of sentencing ranges for certain offences. Driven by populist rhetoric and accompanied by an almost dismissive attitude toward the achievements of criminal law scholarship, the Draft disregards empirical knowledge of the real capacities of punishment and the actual effect of increased repression on crime prevention. By threatening excessive penalties for violations of criminal norms in the sphere of serious forms of criminal behavior, the proponent of these measures continues to strengthen retributive tendencies. In doing so, Serbian criminal law increasingly diverges from the liberal, rule-of-law model, and is rapidly transforming into a form of “enemy-oriented” criminal law – one in which all means are considered permissible in the state’s effort to combat threats to the legal order. Such an orientation is inappropriate for a legal system that seeks to preserve democratic features, as it poses a serious risk of undermining fundamental human rights in the realm of punishment. Moreover, it is frequently accompanied by inefficiency and weak results in controlling criminal behavior. It could be said that such an orientation in the field of criminal policy in the Republic of Serbia is nothing new; on the contrary, if we consider the period since the first serious instance of intensified penal repression in 2009 – when the penalty ranges for as many as one third of existing criminal offences were made more severe – the trend toward prescribing increasingly harsher punishments has shown no sign of abating. What is most concerning, however, is the well-founded fear that this tendency has not yet reached its peak and is likely to continue in the future.
Reference
Bock, Michael. 2010. „Pozitivna specijalna prevencija i nove tendencije u kriminalnoj politici - o nedostacima eliminatornog Feindstrafrecht-krivičnog prava i značaju primenjene kriminologije za kriminalnu politiku po meri ljudske zajednice.” Crimen (Beograd) 1 (2): 139–167. DOI: 10.5937/crimen1002139B
Eliot, Mejbl A. 1962. Zločin u savremenom društvu. Sarajevo: Veselin Maleša.
Foster, Steve Harold. 2015. “Whole Life Sentences and Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Time for Certainty and a Common Approach?” Liverpool Law Review 36: 147–169. DOI: 10.1007/s10991-015-9166-7
Heinrich, Bernd. 2017. “Zum heutigen Zustand der Kriminalpolitik in Deutschland.” Kriminalpolitische Zeitschrift 1: 4–20.
Ilić, Vladica. 2019. „(Ne)pomirljivost kazne doživotnog zatvora i ljudskih prava.” Crimen (Beograd) 10 (2): 156–173. DOI: 10.5937/crimen1902156I
Kolarić, Dragana. 2019. „Orijentacija zakonodavca u poslednjem zakonu o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika – (ne)opravdano jačanje krivičnopravne represije.” Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke 3–4: 13–43. DOI: 10.22182/apdn.342019.1
Krivični zakonik, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 85/2005, 88/2005 - ispr., 107/2005 - ispr., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019 i 94/2024
Martinson, Robert. 1974. “What Works? – Questions and Answers About Prison Reform.” The Public Interest 35: 22–54.
Mrvić Petrović, Nataša. 2022. „Kako učiniti human(ij)im doživotni zatvor koncepta „zaključaj i baci ključ” na primerima Italije i Holandije.” Strani pravni život 3: 403–428. DOI: 10.56461/SPZ_22304KJ
Nacrt zakona o izmenama i dopunama Krivičnog zakonika [Nacrt], 9. septembar 2025. https://ekonsultacije.gov.rs/topicOfDiscussionPage/528/4
Neubacher, Frank. 2006. “An den Grenzen des Strafrechts – Stalking, Graffiti, Weisungsverstöße.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 118 (4): 855–877. DOI: 10.1515/ZSTW.2006.031
Presuda Višeg suda u Novom Pazaru [VSNP], K. 3/23 od 3. aprila 2003. godine.
Republički zavod za statistiku Srbije. 2025. „Punoletni učinioci krivičnih dela, 2024.” 16. jul 2025. https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2025/Pdf/G20251190.pdf
Ristivojević, Branislav R., i Stefan S. Samardžić. 2017. „Zakon o sprečavanju nasilja u porodici – kritički osvrt iz ugla krivičnog prava.” Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad 51 (4): 1441–1451. DOI: 10.5937/zrpfns51-16133
Stojanović, Zoran. 2011a. „Grgur Milovanović – profesor krivičnog prava i krivičnog postupka.” Crimen (Beograd) 2 (1): 133–137.
Stojanović, Zoran. 2011b. „Preventivna funkcija krivičnog prava.” Crimen (Beograd) 2 (1): 3–25.
Stojanović, Zoran. 2020. „Kazneni rasponi i represivnost krivičnog zakonodavstva.” Crimen (Beograd) 11 (1): 3–33. DOI: 10.5937/crimen2001003S
Stojanović, Zoran. 2023. Politika suzbijanja kriminaliteta. Beograd: Pravni fakultet u Beogradu.
Van Zyl Smit, Dirk, and Catherine Appleton 2019. Life Imprisonment – A Global Human Rights Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Punishment & Society.
Vuković, Igor. 2025. „Lična svojstva žrtava kao kvalifikatorna obeležja krivičnih dela – aktuelne tendencije.” U Izazovi međunarodnog krivičnog prava i krivičnog prava, tom 1., ur: Milan Škulić, Ivana Miljuš i Aleksa Škundrić, 105–124. Palić: Udruženje za međunarodno krivično pravo.
Walter, Gordon L. III. 1999. California's Three Strikes Law: Tyranny of the Majority. Whittier Law Review 3: 577–624.
Zaczyk, Rainer. 2011. “Die Notwendigkeit systematischen Strafrechts – Zugleich zum Begriff 'fragmentarisches Strafrecht'.” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft 123 (4): 691–708. DOI: 10.1515/zstw-2011-0691
Zakon o izmenama i dopunama Zakona Krivičnog zakonika, „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 94/2024
