IMPLICITNI STAVOVI VASPITAČA PREMA DAROVITOJ DECI

Vesna Barzut; Jelena Blanuša; Dijana Krstić

doi:10.5937/timsact14-28876

Vesna Barzut Fakultet za sport i turizam Novi Sad
Jelena Blanuša Visoka škola strukovnih studija za obrazovanje vaspitača i trenera, Subotica
Dijana Krstić Visoka škola strukovnih studija za obrazovanje vaspitača i trenera, Subotica

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/timsact14-28876

Ključne reči: darovitost, stavovi vaspitača, implicitni stavovi

Sažetak

Ovim istraživanjem ispitivani su implicitni stavovi profesionalaca iz oblasti predškolskog obrazovanja i vaspitanja prema darovitoj deci. Koristili smo dve vrste procene: koliko je neki stav pravedan i koliko je dobar. Poredili smo stavove vaspitača zaposlenih u predškolskim ustanovama sa stavovima studenata sa smera Strukovni vaspitač predškolskog uzrasta. Kontrolna grupa bili su studenti sa smera Strukovni trener. Ispitivani su stavovi o darovitoj deci kao intelektulano nadmoćnoj, socijalno neprilagođenoj i kao potencijalnim liderima društva. Dobijeni rezultati sugerišu relativno pozitivan stav svih ispitivanih grupa prema darovitoj deci, jedini izuzetak je to što imaju neutralan do blago negativan stav u odnosu na socijalnu prilagođenost. Ovakvi rezultati daju samo delimičnu potvrdu disharmonične hipoteze koju često imaju nastavnici, a po kojoj se pretpostavlja da intelektualnu superiornost darovitih nužno prate i određeni nedostaci u socijalnoj ili emocionalnoj sferi. Sudeći po dobijenim rezultatima, na predškolskom uzrastu još uvek ne postoje negativni stavovi vaspitača prema darovitoj deci. Čini se da se sa iskustvom povećava i vrednovanje kognitivnog aspekta darovitosti od strane profesionalaca.

Reference

Barzut, V., & Blanuša, J. (2015). Pristupi obrazovanju darovitih učenika i procena trenutnog stanja kroz stavove stručnjaka. Pedagogija. 70(1), 73–83.

Barzut, V., & Blanuša, J. (2020). Approaches to Education of Gifted Students in the Republic of Serbia. In S. Hilčenko (ed.) (2020). Thematic Collected Papers from the 11. International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference: ''Horizons" 2020 (pp. 118–124). Subotica: College of Vocational Studies, Subotica Vocational Training of Preschool Teachers and Sports Trainers.

Baudson, T. G., & Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 37–46. doi:10.1037/spq0000011

Bégin, J., & Gagné, F. (1994). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17(2), 161–179.

Blanuša, J., & Barzut, V. (2020). Education of Gifted Children: The Review of Different Approaches and Interventions. In S. Hilčenko (ed.) (2020). Collected Papers from the 11. International Interdisciplinary Scientific Conference: ''Horizons" 2020 (pp. 111–117). Subotica: College of Vocational Studies, Subotica Vocational Training of Preschool Teachers and Sports Trainers.

Blanuša, J., Barzut, V., Krstić, D., & Hilčenko, S. (2021). Effects Of Preschool Teachers’ Training And Practice On The Attitudes Toward Giftedness. Retrieved from psyarxiv.com/9u7ey.

Blanuša, J., Rodić. N., & Knežević, J. (2019). Efficacy of preschool teachers in detecting intellectually gifted children. Paper presented at the 25. Scientific conference Empirical Studies in Psychology, March 29th – 31st, Belgrade, Serbia. Book of abstracts (pp. 63–63).

Carrington, N. G., & Bailey, S. B. (2000). How do preservice teachers view gifted students? Evidence from a NSW study. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 9(1), 18–22.

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., & Gross, M. U. (2004). A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. Iowa City, Iowa, Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.

Čudina-Obradović, M. (1990). Nadarenost: razumijevanje, prepoznavanje, razvijanje. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.

Gagné, F., & Nadeau, L. (1991). Opinions about the gifted and their education. Montréal: GIREDT Center, Université du Québec á Montréal.

Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. (2008). Teachers' negative affect toward academically gifted students: An evolutionary psychological study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231.

Krijan, I., Jurčec, L., & Borić, E. (2015). Attitudes of Primary School Teachers toward Gifted Students. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 681–724.

Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers' attitudes towards the gifted: The importance of professional development and school culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42.

Lee, S. Y., Cramond, B., & Lee, J. (2004). Korean teachers’ attitudes toward academic brilliance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(1), 42–53.

McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers' attitudes toward the gifted? Gifted child quarterly, 51(3), 246–254.

Preckel, F., Baudson, T. G., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., & Glock, S. (2015). Gifted and maladjusted? Implicit attitudes and automatic associations related to gifted children. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1160–1184.

Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and social psychology review, 8(3), 220–247.