Neuropsychological parameters as possible indicators of speech fluency disorder in children
Abstract
Background/Aim. Speech disfluency (stuttering) is a multifactor disorder and its aetiology is a big unknown for the experts from various fields. Hemisphere dominance as the highest level in the process of integration of cortical functions is of special significance for the entire development. Praxis and gnosis related cortical organizers are the first to form; they become differentiated and functionally full in early childhood while the process of condensing is completed somewhere around the age of 7. Cortical activity organizers are definitely set at that age and from then on act from one hemisphere which becomes dominant for that function. Laterality is determined by hemisphere dominance, but it occurs as a special phenomenon and it is of great significance for personality. The aim of this research was to examine the influence and the relationship between hemisphere asymmetry on the occurrence of speech disfluency in children. Methods. Sixty children aged 5 to 7 years participated in this research. Thirty children suffer from speech fluency disorder (person who stutters – PWS) and they belong to the experimental group while thirty children are fluent speakers (person who does not stutter – PWNS) and they were the control group. Individual testing was used as a test method. Laterality assessment test was used as an instrument which consists of 5 sub-tests as follows: the assessment of hand-use laterality, the assessment of gestural hand-use laterality, the assessment of foot laterality, the assessment of auditory laterality and the assessment of visual laterality. Results. Gestural hand-use laterality and auditory laterality in the PWS examinees were considerably worse in comparison to the PWNS examinees (χ2 = 11.80, p = 0.002, and χ2 = 10.90, p = 0.003, respectively). Male examinees had worse scores in comparison with female examinees. Conclusion. There are certain changes in establishing a dominant hemisphere and differentiation of laterality in children who stutter in comparison with the children who are fluent speakers, which has been shown by statistically significant difference in accomplishments at the test of gestural hand-use laterality and the test of auditory laterality.
References
REFERENCES
Levelt W. A History of Psycholinguistics: The Pre-Chomsky an Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Vuković M. The treatment of aphasia. Belgrade: Faculty of Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade; 2008. (Serbian)
Perkins WH. Speech pathology: An applied behavioral science. St. Lois: C. V. Mosby; 1971.
Büchel C, Sommer M. What Causes Stuttering? PLoS Biol 2004; 2(2): e46.
Brajović C, Brajović LJ. The treatment of functional disorders of speech. Belgrade: Naučna knjiga; 1977. (Serbian)
Prasse JE, Kikano GE. Stuttering: an overview. Am Fam Physi-cian 2008; 77(9): 1271–6.
Van Riper C. The nature of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1982. p. 468.
Packman A, Onslow M. Searching for the cause of stuttering. Lancet 2002; 360(9334): 655–6.
Chang SE. Brain Anatomy Differences in Childhood Stutter-ing. Neuroimage 2008; 39(3): 1333–44.
Watkins KE, Smith SM, Davis S, Howell P. Structural and func-tional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering. Brain 2008; 131(Pt 1): 50–9.
Rosenfield DB. Do stutterers have different brains?. Neurology 2001; 57: 171–2.
Bojanin S. Developmental neuropsychology and general re-educative method. Belgrade: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva; 1985. (Serbian)
Travis L. Speech pathology. New York: Appleton-Century; 1931.
Annett MA. A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 1970; 61(3): 303 ̶ 21.
Greiner JR, Fitzgerald HE, Cooke PA. Bimanual hand writing in right-handed and left-handed stutterers and nonstutterers. Neuropsychologia 1986; 24(3): 441–7.
Glozman ZM. Quantitative Evaluation of the Data of Neurop-sychological Examination. Moscow: Tsentr Lech Pedag 1999. (Russian)
Kotik, BS. Study of speech lateralization by means of the di-chotic listening method. In: Leontiev AN, editor. Psychological researches. Moscow: Moscow University Press; 1974; p. 67–77. (Russian)
Vartanov A. Multifactor Method of Dividing EEG into Cortical and Deep Components. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deyat 2002; 52(1): 111.
Saxby L, Bryden MP. Left-Ear Superiority in Children for Processing Auditory Emotional Material. Dev Psychol 1984; 20(1): 72–80.
Vartanov AV, Glozman ZM, Kiselnikov AA, Karpova NL. Cere-bral organization of verbal action in stutterers. Hum Physiol 2005; 31(2): 132–6.
Moore WH Jr, Haynes WO. Alpha hemispheric asymmetry and stuttering: some support for a segmentation dysfunction hypo-thesis. J Speech Hear Res 1980; 23(2): 229–47.
Pool KD, Devous MD Sr, Freeman FJ, Watson BC, Finitzo T. Re-gional cerebral blood flow in developmental stutterers. Arch Neurol 1991; 48(5): 509–12.
Bhatnagar S, Buckingham H. Neurogenic Stuttering: Its Reticular Modulation. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2010; 10(6): 491–8.
Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Schmitz F, Freund HJ. Single word reading in developmental stutterers and fluent speakers. Brain 2000; 123(Pt 6): 1184–202.
Salmelin R, Schnitzler A, Schmitz F, Jäncke L, Witte OW, Freund HJ. Functional organization of the auditory cortex is different in stutterers and fluent speakers. Neuroreport 1998; 9(10): 2225–9.
Dodge D. A reactive inhibition models of stuttering develop-ment and behavior: A neuropsychological theory based on re-cent research. 2003. Available from: http:/telosnet.com/dmdodge/reacthin.html
Fox PT, Ingham RJ, Ingham JC, Hirsch TB, Downs JH, Martin C, et al. A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature 1996; 382(6587): 158–61.
Kushner HI. Retraining left-handers and the aetiology of stuttering: The rise and fall of an intriguing theory. Laterality 2012; 17(6): 673–93.
Boberg E, Yeudall LT, Schopflocher D, Bo-Lassen P. The effect of an intensive behavioral program on the distribution of EEG alpha power in stutterers during the processing of verbal and visuospatial information. J Fluency Disord 1983; 8(3): 245–63.