Factors predicting rehabilitation outcome in patients after unilateral transtibial amputation due to peripheral vascular disease
Abstract
Background/Aim. The primary rehabilitation in the prosthetic phase after amputation of lower extremities is of great importance for the improvement of the activities of daily living (ADLs) of persons with amputation and their successful social reintegration. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of independent predictors (age, gender, duration of rehabilitation, time between the amputation and the mounting of the prosthesis) on the success of the primary rehabilitation in the prosthetic phase after amputation of lower extremities. Methods. This retrospective clinical study included patients who underwent the primary rehabilitation in the prosthetic phase at the Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation “Dr Miroslav Zotović“, Banja Luka, in 2015. A total of 75 patients with unilateral transtibial amputation were included. Etiologically, these transtibial amputations occurred as a consequence of vascular complications of diabetes mellitus or peripheral occlusive arterial disease. Evaluation of the success of rehabilitation was performed at the end of the primary rehabilitation in the prosthetic phase and 3 months after the end of the treatment by means of K-levels classification system and Locomotor Capabilities Index (LCI) scale. Depending on the distribution of data, univariate and multivariate multiple regression analysis, post hoc Mann-Whitney test, Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance of the found differences was set at p < 0.05. Results. A total of 75 patients, 55 (73.33%) men and 20 (26.67%) women, were included in this clinical trial. Average age of all participants was 63.5 ± 9.06 years, 61.8 ± 9.34 years for males and 68.1 ± 6.4 for females (p < 0.01). Average duration of rehabilitation was 27.69 ± 7.39 days in men and 33.9 ± 6.89 days in women (p < 0.01). Male patients had better functional results compared to females obtained by all analysed outcome measures (p < 0.01). Younger patients achieved better results, with the degree of statistical significance ranging between p < 0.05 and p < 0.001. The time from the amputation to the mounting of prosthesis and the duration of rehabilitation had no influence on the rehabilitation outcome. Conclusion. The present study identified age and gender of patients as relevant independent predictors of the success of rehabilitation. Although it was initially expected, this clinical trial did not prove the importance of the time from the amputation to the start of the primary rehabilitation in the prosthetic phase. In the future research other independent predictive factors, such as comorbidities, first and foremost cardiovascular diseases, medication, laboratory parameters and mental status, should be taken into account.
References
Larsson B, Johannesson A, Andersson IH, Atroshi I. The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in patients with lower limb amputation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2009; 7(1): 44.
Resnik L, Borgia M. Reliability of Outcome Measures for People With Lower-Limb Amputations: Distinguishing True Change From Statistical Error. Phys Ther 2011; 91(4): 555–65.
Spaan MH, Vrieling AH, van de Berg P, Dijkstra PU, van Keeken HG. Predicting mobility outcome in lower limb amputees with motor ability tests used in early rehabilitation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2017; 41(2): 171–7.
Carmona G, Hoffmeyer P, Herrmann F, Vaucher J, Tschopp O, Lacraz A, Viscet et al. Major lower limb amputations in the elderly observed over ten years: the role of diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes Metab 2005; 31(5): 449–54.
Most RS, Sinnock P. The Epidemiology of Lower Extremity Amputations in Diabetic Individuals. Diabetes Care 1983; 6(1): 87–91.
Sansam K, Neumann V, O’Connor R, Bhakta B. Predicting walking ability following lower limb amputation: A systematic review of the literature. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41(8): 593–603.
Ng EK, Berbrayer D, Hunter GA. Transtibial Amputation: Preoperative Vascular Assessment and Functional Outcome. JPO J Prosthet Orthot 1996; 8(4): 123–9.
Frlan-Vrgoc L, Vrbanic TS, Kraguljac D, Kovacevic M. Functional outcome assessment of lower limb amputees and prosthetic users with a-minute walk test. Coll Antropol 2011; 35(4): 1215–8.
Raya MA, Gailey RS, Fiebert IM, Roach KE. Impairment Variables Predicting Activity Limitation in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2010; 34(1): 73–84.
Johnson VJ, Kondziela S, Gottschalk F. Pre and post-amputation mobility of trans-tibial amputees: Correlation to medical problems, age and mortality. Prosthet Orthot Int 1995; 19(3): 159–64.
Knezevic A, Petkovic M, Mikov A, Jeremic-Knezevic M, Demesi-Drljan C, Boskovic K, et al. Factors that predict walking ability with a prosthesis in lower limb amputees. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2016; 144(9–10): 507–13.
Nelson VS, Flood KM, Bryant PR, Huang ME, Pasquina PF, Roberts TL. Limb deficiency and prosthetic management. 1. Decision making in prosthetic prescription and management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87(3 Suppl 1): S3–9.
Schoppen T, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, de Vries J, Göeken LN, Eisma WH. Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(6): 803–11.
Condie E, Scott H, Treweek S. Lower limb prosthetic outcome measures: A review of the literature 1995 to 2005. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18(1S): 13–45.
MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Castillo RC, Smith DG, Webb LX, Kellam JF, et al.. Functional Outcomes Following Trauma-Related Lower-Extremity Amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86(8): 1636–45.
Hermodsson Y, Ekdahl C, Persson BM. Outcome after trans-tibial amputation for vascular disease. A follow-up after eight years. Scand J Caring Sci 1998; 12(2): 73–80.
Gauthier-Fiagnon C, Grise M, Potvin D. Predisposing Factors Related to Prosthetic Use by People with a Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputation. J Prostet Orthot 1998; 10(4): 99–109.
Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger C. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75(2): 133–43.
Deathe AB, Wolfe DL, Devlin M, Hebert JS, Miller WC, Pallaveshi L. Selection of outcome measures in lower extremity amputation rehabilitation: ICF activities. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31(18): 1455–73.
Gailey RS, Roach KE, Applegate E, Cho B, Cunniffe B, Licht S, et al. The Amputee Mobility Predictor: An instrument to assess determinants of the lower-limb amputee's ability to ambulate. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83(5): 613–27.
Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC. Tools to Measure Outcome of People with a Lower Limb Amputation: Update on the PPA and LCI. J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18(1S): 61–7.
Davies B, Datta D. Mobility outcome following unilateral lower limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003; 27(3): 186–90.
Munin MC, Guzman MC, Boninger ML, Fitzgerald SG, Penrod LE, Singh J. Predictive factors for successful early prosthetic ambulation among lower-limb amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001 38(4): 379-84.
Kaluf B. Evaluation of Mobility in Persons with Limb Loss Using the Amputee Mobility Predictor and the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire–Mobility Subscale: a six-month retrospective chart review. J Prosthet Orthot 2014; 26(2): 70–6.