Voice analysis before and after vocal rehabilitation in patients following open surgery on vocal cords

  • Mila B Bunijevac "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju, Odsek za logopediju"
  • Mirjana Petrović-Lazić Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; ENT Clinic, Clinical Hospital Center “Zvezdara”, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Nadica Jovanović-Simić Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Mile Vuković Faculty for Special Education and Rehabilitation, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: otorhinolaryngologic surgical procedures, laryngeal neoplasms, treatment outcome, voice quality, rehabilitation, speech production measurement,

Abstract


Background/Aim. The major role of larynx in speech, respiration and swallowing makes carcinomas of this region and their treatment very influential for patients’ life quality. The aim of this study was to assess the importance of voice therapy in patients after open surgery on vocal cords. Methods. This study included 21 male patients and the control group of 19 subjects. The vowel (A) was recorded and analyzed for each examinee. All the patients were recorded twice: firstly, when they contacted the clinic and secondly, after a three-month vocal therapy, which was held twice per week on an outpatient basis. The voice analysis was carried out in the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Clinic, Clinical Hospital Center “Zvezdara” in Belgrade. Results. The values of the acoustic parameters in the patients submitted to open surgery on the vocal cords before vocal rehabilitation and the control group subjects were significantly different in all specified parameters. These results suggest that the voice of the patients was damaged before vocal rehabilitation. The results of the acoustic parameters of the vowel (A) before and after vocal rehabilitation of the patients with open surgery on vocal cords were statistically significantly different. Among the parameters – Jitter (%), Shimmer (%) – the observed difference was highly statistically significant (p < 0.01). The voice turbulence index and the noise/harmonic ratio were also notably improved, and the observed difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The analysis of the tremor intensity index showed no significant improvement and the observed difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05 ). Conclusion. There was a significant improvement of the acoustic parameters of the vowel (A) in the study subjects three months following vocal therapy. Only one out of five representative parameters showed no significant improvement.

Author Biography

Mila B Bunijevac, "Univerzitet u Beogradu, Fakultet za specijalnu edukaciju i rehabilitaciju, Odsek za logopediju"
Master logoped - vokalni patolog

References

de Diego J, Prim M, Verdaguer J, Pérez-Fernández E, Gavilán J. Long-term results of open cordectomy for the treatment of T1a glottic laryngeal carcinoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 2009; 36(1): 53−6.

Mikic A, Petrovic Z, Djukic V, Dimitrijevic M, Stankovic P, Pendjer I, et al. Surgery treatment of laryngeal carcinoma T1. Acta Chir Iugoslav 2004; 51(1): 20−5. (Serbian)

Deliyski D. Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Speech Communication and Technology. 1993 Sept 21−23; Berlin, Germany: Eurospeech; 1993. p. 1969−72.

Laver J, Hiller S, Beck JM. Acoustic waveform perturbations and voice disorders. J Voice 1992; 6(2): 115−26.

Petrović-Lazić M, Dobrota N, Jovanović-Simić N. Multidimensional analysis of vowels in functional dysphonia's. In: World Con-gress of the International Association of Logopaedics and Phoniatrics (XXVII); Brisbane; 2007 August 6−9. Copenha-gen: Tehnical University Denmark; 2007

Jotic A, Stankovic P, Jesic S, Milovanovic J, Stojanovic M, Djukic V. Voice quality after treatment of early glottic carcinoma. J Voice 2012; 26(3): 381−9.

MacKenzie K, Millar A, Wilson J, Sellars C, Deary I. Is voice ther-apy an effective treatment for dysphonia? A randomised con-trolled. Br Med J 2001; 323(7314): 658.

Vilaseca I, Huerta P, Blanch JL, Fernández-Planas AM, Jiménez C,Bernal-Sprekelsen M. Voice quality after CO2 laser cordecto-my--what can we reallyexpect? Head Neck 2008; 30(1): 43−9.

Galletti B, Freni F, Cammaroto G, Catalano N, Gangemi G, Galletti F. Vocal outcome after CO2 laser cordectomy performed on patients affected by early glottic carcinoma. J Voice 2012; 26(6): 801−5.

van Gogh CD, Verdonck-de LI, Langendijk JA, Kuik DJ, Mahieu HF. Long-term efficacy of voice therapy in patients with voice problems after treatment of early glottic cancer. J Voice 2012; 26(3): 398−401.

Published
2017/01/27
Section
Original Paper