Estimating disability and quality of life after different degrees of hand and forearm trauma

Marija Marinković; Zlata Janjić; Jelena Nikolić

doi:10.2298/3782

Marija Marinković Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
Zlata Janjić Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia
Jelena Nikolić Clinic for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clinical Center of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/3782

Keywords: hand injuries, quality of life, disability evaluation, questionnaires,

Abstract

Background/Aim. Hand injuries comprise up to one fourth of all injuries and require excellent skills and aggressive physical therapy with still a high potential to cause long term physical and functional disability which affects one’s quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate disability and quality of life in patients with different degrees of hand and forearm injuries using the two different scoring sistems and to examine the correlation between them. Methods. This retrospective study was performed among patients operated on at our clinic due to acute hand and forearm trauma during the period of two years. Four groups of patients were made according to the Modified Hand Injury Severity Score (MHISS). One year after the treatment, phone interviews were made with those patients to answer to the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (quick-DASH) score for estimating disability and to the World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) score to estimate the quality of life regerding four domains: physical, social, environmental and psychological. Results. Out of 182 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria, only 60 completely answered to the questionnaires, 46 (17%) men and 14 (23%) women. Most of the patients were in the group with moderate injuries according to the MHISS, followed by the group with major and severe injuries. A weak correlation was found between the MHISS and quick DASH score in the group with minor injuries, compared to no correlation between these parameters in other groups. The lowest quality of life was registered in the physical domain, while the highest in the social one. A negative correlation was found among the four domains of the WHOQoL BREF score and quick-DASH score in all the groups. Conclusion. Severity of hand and forearm injuries does not necessarily correlate with patient’s perception of disability. The quality of life was less affected by severity of injury than by the patient’s perception of disability.

References

Chan JC, Ong JC, Avalos G, Regan PJ, McCann J, Groarke A, et al. Illness representations in patients with hand injury. J Plast Re-constr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62(7): 927−322.

Urso-Baiarda F, Lyons RA, Laing JH, Brophy S, Wareham K, Camp D. A prospective evaluation of the Modified Hand Injury Se-verity Score in predicting return to work. Int J Surg 2008; 6(1): 45−50.

Barker M, Power C, Roberts I. Injuries and the risk of disability in teenagers and young adults. Arch Dis Child 1996; 75(2): 156−8.

Janjić Z, Nikolić J, Marinković M. Hand injuies with agricutural machinery as an indicator of the social level of a region. Trakt i Pog Maš 2008; 13(3): 57−63. (Serbian)

Campbell DA, Kay SP. The Hand Injury Severity Scoring Sys-tem. J Hand Surg (Br) 1996; 21(3): 295−8.

Institute for work and health: The Quick DASH. 2006. Avail-able from: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca

Libberecht K, Lafaire C, Van Hee R. Evaluation and functional assessment of flexor tendon repair in the hand. Acta Chir Belg 2006; 106(5): 560−5.

Wong JY, Fung BK, Chu MM, Chan RK. The use of Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire in rehabilitation after acute traumatic hand injury. J Hand Ther 2007; 20(1): 49−56, quiz 56.

Kovacs L, Grob M, Zimmermann A, Eder M, Herschbach P, Henrich G, et al. Quality of life after severe hand injury. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64(11): 1495−502.

Study protocol for World Health Organization project to de-velop a Quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 1993; 2(2): 153−9.

Van-Stevens L, Munneke M, Spauwen P, Linde H. Assesment of Acitivities in Patients with hand injury: A review of instruments in use. Hand Ther 2007; 12(1): 4−14.

Schier JS, Chan J. Changes in life roles after hand injury. J Hand Ther 2007; 20(1): 57−68, quiz 69.

van Delft-Schreurs CC, van Bergen JJ, de Jongh MA, van de Sande P, Verhofstad MH, de Vries J. Quality of life in severely injured pa-tients depends on psychosocial factors rather than on severity or type of injury. Injury 2014; 45(1): 320−6.

Cederlund RI, Ramel E, Rosberg HE, Dahlin LB. Outcome and clinical changes in patients 3, 6, 12 months after a severe or major hand injury-can sense of coherence be an indicator for rehabilitation focus? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 286.

Alves AL, Salim FM, Martinez EZ, Passos AD, De Carlo MM, Scarpelini S. Quality of life in trauma victims six months after hospital discharge. Rev Saude Publica 2009; 43(1): 154−60. (English, Portuguese)