Essay on Observing Gender Through the Prism of Judith Butler’s Performativity Theory
Abstract
The observation of gender in postmodern discourse has opened the question of conceptuality, with the significant premise that gender is not constant but is continuously changing. When it is said that gender is culturally shaped, it implies its formation on a particular social and cultural basis. From this point of view, gender becomes a sort of ‘achieved status’, i.e. something constructed not only by cultural and social but also by psychological means. More precisely, gender is established, created, or manifested; as a result of everyday interactions in the socialization process, it is repeated, ultimately structuring itself. The starting point for this work is the philosophical opinion of the famous author Judith Butler who, while analysing gender on a theoretical level in her work The Gender Trouble, ‘established’ the outline of the theory of performativity. Hence, one of the goals of this work is the analytical and critical consideration of the thesis of gender as a performative. Judith Butler’s understanding of gender stems from the postulate that “no one is gender from the very beginning” and, actually, “your behaviour creates your sex”, i.e. creates the outlines of gender as a performative. In this context, one can state that gender, as a result of its compulsion, becomes unstable over time. The development of gender in the theory of performativity—a simple linguistic convention that forces us to behave differently, although by doing so, we are aware that in some way we are re-performing or creating gender—opens up space for the analysis of our discourse on gender in a symbolic-discursive order.
References
Батлер, Џ. (2001). Тела која нешто значе – о дискурзивним границама „пола”. Београд: Самиздат Б92.
Батлер, Џ. (2016). Невоља с родом – феминизам и субверзија идентитета. Београд: Карпос.
Башарагин, М. (2019). Род, култура и дискурс разговора у разреду (одбрањена докторска дисертација). Војвођанска академија наука и уметности, Нови Сад.
Вујановић, А. (2023, 8. новембар). Џудит Батлер – теоријски „субјект од крви и меса”. Феномени. https://fenomeni.me/dzudit-batler/
Гиденс, Е. (2005). Социологија. Београд: Економски факултет.
Де Бовоар, С. (1983). Други пол II: животно искуство. Београд: БИГЗ.
Захаријевић, А. (2020). Живот тела: политичка филозофија Џудит Батлер. Нови Сад: Академска књига.
Кафка, Ф. (1987). Процес. Београд: Просвета – БИГЗ.
Ниче, Ф. (1990). Генеалогија морала. Београд: Графос.
Остин, Џ. (1994). Како деловати речима. Нови Сад: Матица српска.
Фуко, М. (1982). Воља за знањем: историја сексуалности. Београд: Просвета.
Anemțoaicei, O. (2020, 3. jul). Cui îi e frică de „ideologia de gen”?. Observator Cultural, 1020. https://www.observatorcultural.ro/articol/cui-ii-e-frica-de-ideologia-de-gen/
Barad, K. (2014). Performativitatea postumană-Către o înţelegere a modului în care materia ajunge să conteze. Post(h)um. Jurnal de studii (post)umaniste, 1, 135–161.
Batler, Dž. (2005). Raščinjavanje roda. Sarajevo: TKD Šahinpašić.
Benhabib, S. (1995). Feminism and postmodernism. In: L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (pp. 17–34). New York: Routledge.
Bordo, S. (1999). Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Boucher, G. (2006). The politics of performativity: A critique of Judith Butler. Parrhesia, 1, 112–141.
Braidotti, R. (2000). Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Carver, Т. (2003). Gender. In: R. Bellamy & A. Mason (Eds.), Political Concepts (pp. 169–181). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ciocoi, T. (2010). Retrospectivă istorie şi teorie literară feministă. Intertext, 3–4, 134–142.
Comstock, O. (2017). Book Review of Judith Butler’s Gender Trouble. https://uiwomenscenter.wordpress.com/2017/04/15/book-review-of-judith-butlers-gender-trouble/
Cyfer, I. (2019). What’s the trouble with humanity? A feminist critique of Judith Butler’s ethics of vulnerability. In: A. Bueno & M. Teixeira (Eds.), On the Politics of Social Suffering (pp. 1–15). Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and Universidad de Antioquia. http://doi.org/10.7238/d.v0i23.3157
Derrida, J. (1988). Signature Event Context. In: J. Derrida (Ed.), Limited, Inc (pp. 1–23). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Deschênes, M. (2013). Ricœur et Butler: Lumières sur le débat sexe/genre, à travers le prisme de l’identité narrative. Ricoeur Studies, 4(1), 113–129.
Haar, M. (1977). Nietzsche and Metaphysical Language. In: D. Allison (Ed.), The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles of Interpretation (pp. 5–36). New York: Delta.
Jami, I. (2008). Judith Butler, théoricienne du genre. Cahiers du Genre, 44(1), 205–228.
Niedda, M. (2020). Feminist and queer studies: Judith Butler’s conceptualisation of gender. La Clé des Langues, 1, 1–10.
Răducu, C. D. (2011). Genul. In: E. Huzum (Ed.), Concepte şi teorii social-politice (pp. 85–112). Iaşi: Academia Română – Filiala Iaşi, Institutul European.
Salih, S. (2004). On Judith Butler and performativity. In: S. Salih & J. Butler (Eds.), The Judith Butler Reader (pp. 55–68). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Schützeichel, R. (2007). Soziale Repräsentationen. In: R. Schützeichel (Ed.), Handbuch Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung (pp. 450–455). Konstanz: UVK.
Tuhkanen, M. (2009). Performativity and becoming. Cultural Critique, 72, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/cul.0.0047
Wittig, M. (1985). The mark of gender. Feminist Issues, 5, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02685575
Ženska mreža. Intervju sa Džudit Batler (1993). Rod kao performans. Radical Philosophy, 67. QT magazin, 1–2
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at:
