Language, Art, and the (Social) Body in Modern and Postmodern Aestheticism: A Comparison of Wilde and Nabokov
Abstract
In this paper, the author argues for a theoretical difference between the modern and postmodern aestheticism and considers their political implications arguing that modern aestheticism carried progressive or radical political impulse; whereas, under postmodernism, its character shifted into a reactionary politics. The specific political implications that are derived from these two kinds of aestheticism concern the attitude towards human nature, different kinds of narcissistic tendencies and divergent attitudes towards art/culture. Next, the author uses the examples of Oscar Wilde’s Picture of Dorian Gray and Nabokov’s Lolita to demonstrate how these differences manifest themselves in the works of these two prominent, if not pivotal, artists related to the aesthetic movement in the history of literature. It is concluded that the politics of Oscar Wilde and Vladimir Nabokov differ radically and these differences stem from the fact that their works embody divergent conceptions of aestheticism.
References
Adorno, T. W., Noerr, G. S., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Amis, M. (2013, December 28). Lolita: Martin Amis on Morality in Vladimir Nabokov's Novel (1998). Retrieved June 15, 2017, from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiG_QK1vvUU
Benjamin, W. (2010). The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Lexington, KY: Prism Key Press.
Bloom, A. D. (2012). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.
Derrida, J., & Spivak, G. C. (1997). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eagleton, T. (2010). On Evil. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eagleton, T. (2011). Why Marx was right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Flaubert, G. (n.d.). Gustave Flaubert Writes Letter to Ivan Turgenev. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from http://www.rjgeib.com/about-me/faq/gustave-flaubert.html
Foucault, M. (1984). What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault Reader (pp. 32-50). New York: Pantheon Books.
Graeber, D. (2017, May 10). Of Flying Cars and the Declining Rate of Profit. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from http://www.thebaffler.com/salvos/of-flying-cars-and-the-declining-rate-of-profit
Gramsci, A. (1991). Prison Notebooks. New York: Columbia University Press.
Harvey, D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. London: Verso.
Kant, I. (2009). An Answer to the Question What is Enlightenment. New York: Penguin.
Lambourne, L. (1996). The Aesthetic Movement. London: Phaidon.
Lenin, V. I. (1992). The State and Revolution: the Marxist Theory of the State and Tasks of the Proletariat in the Revolution. London: Penguin Books Limited.
Marcuse, H. (1968). One Dimensional Man. London: Sphere Books.
Marković, V. (2011). Uporedni svetovi. Belgrade: Stubovi Kulture.
Marx, K. (1992). Manifesto of the communist party. Raleigh, N.C.: Alex Catalogue.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). The German ideology. Moscow: Progress .
Nabokov, V. (1992). Lolita. New York: Knopf.
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: the Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.
Rose, J. (2010). The intellectual life of the British working classes. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scruton, R. (2009, December 2). The Modern Cult of Ugliness. Retrieved September 1, 2017, from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1231948/Why-sordid-art-like-Tracey-Emins-led-cult-ugliness-Britain.html
Wilde, O. (1993). The picture of Dorian Gray. Charlottesville, Va.: University of Virginia Library.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: