Personality Traits as Predictors of Depression, Anxiety and Stress with Secondary School Students of Final Years

Milena M. Vujičić; Dušan J. Ranđelović

doi:10.5937/zrffp47-14984

Milena M. Vujičić University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Psychological counseling for students, SKC Niš
Dušan J. Ranđelović University of Priština with temporary head office in Kosovska Mitrovica, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/zrffp47-14984

Keywords: secondary school students, stress, anxiety, depression, personality traits,

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to examine the predictive power of personality traits, as defined by the Big five model of personality in expressing depression, anxiety, and stress with secondary school students of final years. The research was conducted on a sample of 977 secondary school students in the third and fourth grade from ten secondary schools in Niš. The gender structure of the sample was as follows: 397 boys and 607 girls. The following instruments were used in the research: Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21; Lovibond and Lovibond, 1995), Big Five Inventory – BFI (John, Donahue and Kentle, 1991). The results showed that the regression model constructed by personal traits (Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to experience) explain 26% of the criterion variable of Anxiety. The largest individual contribution to the prediction of this variable is achieved by the personal trait Neuroticism (β=.34, p<0.01). Other personal traits that contribute to the prediction of this variable at a statistically significant level are Extraversion (β=-.17, p<0.01), Agreeableness (β=-.14, p<0.01) and Conscientiousness (β=-.17, p<0.01). The same model explains 37% of the criterion variable Stress. The largest individual contribution to Stress prediction is achieved by the personal trait Neuroticism (β=.57, p<0.01). The same model explains 27% of the criterion variable Anxiety as well. The largest individual contribution to the prediction of this variable is achieved by the personal trait Neuroticism (β=.45, p<0.01), whereas a statistically significant correlation between personal traits Agreeableness (β=-.06, p<0.05) and Conscientious (β=-.12, p<0.01) exists. Results show that the difference between boys and girls in expressing Anxiety (t=-2.96, p<0.01) and Stress (t=-5.01, p<0.01) exists. These emotional states are more expressive with girls. However, there are no differences in expressing Depression, Anxiety, and Stress with secondary school students of the third and fourth grade on the examined sample.

References

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S. & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97, 143–156.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality’’: Тhe Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

Hudek-Knežević, J., Krapić, N. & Kalebić-Maglica, B. (2009). Organizacijski stres i stavovi prema radu kao prediktori zdravstvenih ishoda: prospektivno istraživanje. Društvena istraživanja, 18(1–2), 129–149.

Lovibond, S. H. & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.

John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five inventory – versions 4a and 54. Berkley, CA: University of California, Berkley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.

John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (102–138). New York: The Guilford Press.

Jovanović, V., Gavrilov-Jerković, V., Žuljević, D. & Brdarić, D. (2014). Psihometrijska evaluacija Skale depresivnosti, anksioznosti i stresa–21 (DASS–21) na uzorku studenata u Srbiji. Psihologija, 47(1), 93–112.

Krapić, N. (2005). Dimenzije ličnosti petofaktorskog modela i radno ponašanje. Psihologijske teme, 14 (1), 39–55.

Marić, M. (2010). Osobine ličnosti, životni događaji i anksioznost adolescenata. Primenjena psihologija, 1, 39–57.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1991). Adding liebe und arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 227–232.

Međedović, J. (2009). Bazična struktura ličnosti i kriminalitet. Primenjena psihologija, 2 (3), 339–367.

Mroczek, K. D. & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000). The Role of Rumination in Depressive Disorders and Mixed Anxiety/Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109 (3), 504–511.

Otašević, B. & Kodžopeljić, J. (2016). Osobine ličnosti modela velikih pet i sociodemografske varijable kao prediktori važnih životnih ciljeva. Primenjena psiholgija, 9 (1), 23–40.

Rutter, M. (1981). Stress, coping, and development: Some issues and questions. Journal of Child Psychology, Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 22, 323–356.

Smederevac, S. & Mitrović, D. (2006). Ličnost – metodi i modeli. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju.

Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Conceptual and methodological issues in anxiety research. In: C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research (481– 492). New York: Academic Press.

Vrućinić, Ž. (2014). Povezanost karakteristika ličnosti sa ispoljavanjem stresa i načinom njegovog prevladavanja. Evropski defendologija centar za naučna, politička, ekonomska, bezbjednosna, sociološka i kriminološka istraživanja, Banja Luka.

Watson, D. & Clark, L.A. (1992). On traits and temperament: General and specific factors of emotional experience and their relation to five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 441–476.

Wenar, C. (2003). Razvojna psihopatologija i psihijatrija: od dojenačke dobi do adolescencije. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.

Zotović, M. (2002). Stres i posledice stresa: prikaz transakcionističkog teorijskog modela. Psihologija, 35 (1–2), 3–23.