Language Competence of Content Teachers in the Framework of the CLIL Approach: A Case Study
Abstract
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) promoted by the Bologna Declaration has not yet taken root in universities in the European Union and the Balkans. Some of the main obstacles are the lack of interest of teachers of content subjects in higher education, primarily due to insufficient knowledge of English and/or English for specific purposes, as well as the lack of professional literature. The paper presents the results of a research conducted at a faculty of the University of Priština in Kosovska Mitrovica, which aimed to determine whether the application of CLIL teaching is applicable and identify the problems teachers face most often when teaching in a foreign language.
For the purpose of this research, a qualitative method was used. Sixteen (16) teachers took an oral test in December 2020. This specialized oral test consisted of 15 questions and was designed to test the competencies of teachers for teaching content subjects in English. Also, for the purposes of this research, two questionnaires were forwarded: a) to students after an experimental lecture in English b) to teachers of a foreign (English) language at the said faculty.
We can conclude that both teachers and students believe that teaching and learning content in English is very important and that knowledge of English is necessary for professional advancement. However, the number of teachers of vocational subjects who were willing to be tested orally, the test results and the opinion of foreign language teachers on the application of this approach at this faculty, are indicators that for now its application is, unfortunately, far fetched. In order to ensure the quality of teaching and learning, it is necessary to aim at the sustainability of the CLIL approach and at the systematic training of teachers in order to create programs that conceptualize the integration of content and language, connect subject and language teachers and specialists at all levels.
References
Ball, P., Kelly, K., Clegg, J. (2016). Putting CLIL into Practice: Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers. Oxford University Press.
Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied linguistics, 35 (3), 243–262.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D. (2010). Content and Language Integrated Learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society. Maidenhead: Open UP.
Ignjačević, A. (2012). Strani jezici i univerzitet: strategije i nedoumice. U: B. Dimitrijević (ur.), Filologija i univerzitet (693–706). Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
Jovanović, A., Janković, A., Lončar-Vujnović, M. (2012). A Pinch of CLIL a Dash of CALL: An Example of a Blended Course in English for Endocrinology. [Conference proceedings] Teaching Foreign Languages for Special Purposes (149–156). Perugia, Italy: University for Foreigners.
Lang, J. (2002). Foreword by Minister of Education, France in TIE_CLIL Professional Development Course. Milan: TIE-CLIL.
Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual Education and Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Association for Cross-cultural Communication (Eds.), Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua). Paris: University of Sorbonne.
Marsh, D. (2001). CLIL/Emile – The European Dimension [white paper]. Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/comm/education/policies/lang/doc/david_marsh-report.pdf
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. DG Education & Culture, European Commission.
Marsh, D. & Langé, G. (2000). Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. Jyväskylä & Milan: TIE-CLIL.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan Education.
Pavesi, M., Bertocchi, D., Hofmannová, M., Kazianka, M. (2001). CLIL Guidelines for Teachers. Milan: TIE CLIL.
Vučo, J. (2014). Bilingual teaching of foreign languages in Serbia. In: J. Filipović & O. Durbaba (Eds.). Languages in Education and Language Education Policy (99–146). Belgrade: Čigoja.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: