Online English Dictionaries: An Overview of the Characteristics of Three Dictionaries and an Analysis of Their Suitability for Students
Abstract
In this paper we have scrutinized three popular monolingual English dictionaries: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English Online, Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries, and Merriam–Webster Dictionary, the online versions of the printed Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary and Merriam–Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. After the introductory part, consisting of a short overview of the general nature and importance of (online) dictionaries in the classroom, we have presented general characteristics that all observed dictionaries have in common. Following this, a more in-depth analysis of the intricacies of the three dictionaries has been given. We have studied the additional functions that each of the dictionaries has (the thesaurus, synonymous expressions, fun facts, quizzes, grammar exercises, etc.). Finally, we have established a connection between this technological innovation and the classroom itself. We have used three factors to determine the suitability and influence of each dictionary: (a) economy; (b) interactivity; (c) simplicity. Our aim was to determine the importance and effectiveness of modern technologies, so that their potential can be implemented in education. Based on the observed data, we can conclude that LDCEO and OLD (given their pedagogical purposes) are more suitable dictionaries for students of English as a foreign language on the primary and high school levels, while MWD, due to its purpose, complexity of language and other advanced features is more suitable for students on higher levels of education.
References
Спасић, Н. и Тодоровић, М. (2022а). Синхрони преглед једнојезичних онлајн речника српског језика. Филолог, XIII, 25, 222–239.
Спасић, Н. и Тодоровић, М. (2022б). Предности електронских речника и њихова примена у настави страних језика [у припреми].
Chiu, L.-L. & Liu, G. Z. (2013). Effects of Printed, Pocket Electronic, and Online Dictionaries on High School Students’ English Vocabulary Retention. Asia-Pacific Edu Res, 22, 619–634.
De Schryver, G. M. (2003). Lexicographers’ Dreams in the Electronic Dictionary Age. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(2), 143–199.
Fuertes-Olivera, P. A. (2013). The Theory and Practice of Specialised Online Dictionaries for Translation. International Annual for Lexicography, 29(1), 69–91.
Kim, N. (2003). The Effect of the Computer Dictionary and the Paper Dictionary on L2 Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition. SNU Working Papers in English Language and Linguistics, 2, 1–18.
Müller-Spitzer, C. & Koplenig, A. (2014). Online Dictionaries: Expectations and Demands. In: C. Müller-Spitzer (Ed.), Using Online Dictionaries (143–188). Berlin: de Gruyter GmbH.
Nesi, H. (2000a). Electronic Dictionaries in Second Language Vocabulary Comprehension and Acquisition: The State of the Art. In: U. Heid, S. Evert, E. Lehmann, C. Rohrer (Eds.), IX EURALEX International Conference (839–847). Stuttgart: EURALEX.
Nesi, H. (2000b). On Screen or in Print? Students’ Use of a Learner’s Dictionary on CD-ROM and in Book Form. In: P. Howarth & R. Herington (Eds.), Issues in EAP Learning Technologies (106–114). Leeds: Leeds University Press.
Sengupta, A. (2012). Online Dictionary: Language Learner’s Online Guide. Journal of Technology for ELT, II(2). Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/site/journaloftechnologyforelt/archive/april-2012/4-online-dictionary-by-sengupta?authuser=0
Töpel, A. (2014). Review of Research into the Use of Electronic Dictionaries. In: C. Mьller-Spitzer (Ed.), Using Online Dictionaries (13–54). Berlin: de Gruyter GmbH.
The details about the publication policy, including copyright and licensing, are available at: